Complete the Stage 24 documentation audit

docs/roadmap/audit.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Repository Audit Ledger
 
-Status: In progress; Stages 1-23 complete.
+Status: In progress; Stages 1-24 complete.
 
 This temporary roadmap document is the evidence ledger for the staged audit
 defined by [the audit plan](audit-plan.md). It records audit evidence and
@@ -196,6 +196,21 @@ labels. Report-specific generated types/builders, explicit prompt allowlist
 projections, package-local safety copies and path diagnostics, config-to-
 briefing validation, top-level workflow orchestration, and the current narrow
 resolved-value clone remain intentionally explicit.
+Stage 24 found five low-severity documentation-coherence issues: public and
+internal CLI descriptions have drifted from executable help and comparison
+dispatch; focused internal guides name a nonexistent forecast API, an absent
+collection workflow, and report tests that do not exist; two completed
+comparison roadmaps retain parallel current command and artifact definitions;
+and the shared executor's concurrent-call requirement remains implicit rather
+than part of its substitutability contract. The configuration reference also
+omits accepted report-key normalization and timezone-offset bounds. Other
+configuration fields/defaults, integration shapes, schema, template,
+report/module/prompt identities, maintained examples, local and external
+links, fence languages, security examples, and
+the scoped atomic-visibility wording otherwise agree with their executable or
+historical owners. Existing implementation defects that violate correctly
+stated intended contracts remain assigned to their earlier findings rather
+than being duplicated as documentation defects.
 Subsystem conclusions and final disposition remain pending the later stages.
 
 ## Baseline Metadata
@@ -380,7 +395,7 @@ with evidence about meaningful risks, test ownership, gaps, and duplication.
 | Test durability, duplication, and maintenance cost | Repository-wide suite | 21 | Partly insufficient. Most tests assert stable behavior with direct fixtures and appropriately narrow fakes. `AUD-039`, `AUD-061`, and `AUD-063` identify duplicated or implementation-coupled assertions; `AUD-062` identifies avoidable production waits; `AUD-064` identifies incomplete failure cleanup. Each consolidation retains a named behavioral owner. |
 | Cross-cutting efficiency | Graph metrics, workflow traces, and focused latency/allocation diagnostics | 22 | Partly insufficient. Fixed-size registries, service-sized derivation, template parsing, batch composition, and ordinary profile fan-out are proportionate. `AUD-065` records one redundant Weather API request plus serial independent source fetches; `AUD-066` records repeated full comparison-bundle reads during replacement. |
 | Cross-cutting maintainability | Graph similarity, change history, caller traces, and focused structural review | 23 | Partly insufficient. `AUD-067` through `AUD-073` identify duplicated canonicalization/template/date/requirement policy, parallel metadata authority, dormant internal surfaces, and unsafe duplicate capitalization. Important report, prompt-curation, safety-copy, validation, and orchestration similarities remain explicit under `RET-053` through `RET-058`. |
-| Documentation and executable-contract coherence | Canonical documents, code, schemas, templates, examples | 24 | Pending |
+| Documentation and executable-contract coherence | Canonical documents, code, schemas, templates, examples | 24 | Partly insufficient. `AUD-074` through `AUD-078` record CLI/help drift, stale internal flow/API/test claims, completed-roadmap duplication, an implicit concurrent-executor requirement, and incomplete configuration normalization/bounds. Other volatile identities and maintained examples match their executable owners; linked summaries, historical release notes, and the accepted ADR remain appropriately distinct. |
 | Dynamic robustness and diagnostic checks | Repository-wide deterministic checks | 25 | Pending |
 
 ## Findings
@@ -3208,6 +3223,231 @@ with evidence about meaningful risks, test ownership, gaps, and duplication.
 - Related findings: `AUD-024`, `AUD-025`, `AUD-067`
 - Remediation reference: pending
 
+### AUD-074: CLI help and internal guidance disagree with action behavior
+
+- Stage: 24
+- Status: candidate
+- Severity: low
+- Confidence: high
+- Category: documentation
+- Area: `internal/cli/root.go`, `internal/cli.writeActionResult`,
+  `docs/cli.md`, and `docs/internal/cli.md`
+- Evidence: Executable root help includes `--date` in Daily, Today, and
+  comparison usage but omits it from the Options list. Its `--quiet` text says
+  that only successful action output is suppressed, while
+  `writeActionResult` returns before writing every result-bearing summary or
+  routine batch status, including failed summaries; the focused comparison
+  test confirms failed quiet execution. `docs/cli.md` first describes that
+  actual all-summary behavior, but its flag table repeats the successful-only
+  wording. `docs/internal/cli.md` additionally says dispatch is limited to
+  generation and batch even though `Runner.Run` has a complete comparison
+  branch and focused comparison command tests.
+- Executable authority and canonical documentation owner: CLI parsing, root
+  help, dispatch, and result output in `internal/cli` are executable authority.
+  `docs/cli.md` owns the public flag/output contract and
+  `docs/internal/cli.md` owns dispatch mechanics.
+- Contract at risk: Help and canonical CLI documentation must give one usable
+  accepted-flag matrix and one truthful account of which result channels quiet
+  mode suppresses.
+- Impact: An operator can miss the date option in the normal Options reference
+  or expect a failed action summary under `--quiet`; a maintainer can also
+  follow an internal flow description that omits an implemented top-level
+  action.
+- Recommendation: Add `--date` with its command eligibility to executable
+  help, describe `--quiet` as suppressing all action summaries and routine
+  batch status in help and the one public flag row, and update CLI internals to
+  include comparison dispatch and its result shape. Keep the complete
+  acceptance matrix only in `docs/cli.md` and link to it from internals.
+- Test implications: Extend help coverage to require the date option and the
+  accurate quiet wording. Retain the existing behavioral quiet tests rather
+  than duplicating every failed action in help tests.
+- Validation: Root and comparison help agree with `docs/cli.md`; generate,
+  run, and comparison failed-result tests remain silent under `--quiet`; and
+  CLI internals name all three action families.
+- Related findings: `AUD-010`, `AUD-071`
+- Remediation reference: pending
+
+### AUD-075: Internal guides describe nonexistent APIs, flows, and tests
+
+- Stage: 24
+- Status: candidate
+- Severity: low
+- Confidence: high
+- Category: documentation
+- Area: `docs/internal/forecast-derivation.md`,
+  `docs/internal/collect.md`, `docs/internal/report-registry.md`, and
+  `docs/internal/prompt-input.md`
+- Evidence: Forecast internals name `BuildPeriodDailySummaries` and
+  period-summary failure behavior, but graph and source search find only
+  `BuildDailySummary`; `facts.BuildDerived` intentionally builds one civil-day
+  summary for Daily, Today, and Tomorrow. Collection internals say generation,
+  batch, and "explicit bundle fetching" use `collect.Run`, while its sole
+  production caller is the default app collector used by the report workflows
+  and no explicit fetch command or application workflow exists. The report
+  guide says focused report tests cover run IDs, resolved output names,
+  composition defaults, and override validation, but `go test
+  ./internal/report -list .` lists only five tests and does not cover Daily
+  run-ID uniqueness (`AUD-003`) or the claimed override surface. Prompt-input
+  internals likewise claim focused atomic-save tests even though
+  `promptinput.Save` has no caller or focused test (`AUD-001`).
+- Executable authority and canonical documentation owner: The graph and
+  package symbols/tests in `internal/forecast`, `internal/facts`,
+  `internal/collect`, `internal/report`, and `internal/promptinput` are the
+  executable authorities. Their matching focused documents under
+  `docs/internal/` are the canonical documentation owners.
+- Contract at risk: Focused internal guides should describe the implemented
+  package boundary and real verification inventory, not imply unavailable
+  entry points or protection that the suite does not provide.
+- Impact: Maintainers can design against a nonexistent multi-day constructor
+  or fetch workflow and can overestimate regression protection for run
+  identity, overrides, or atomic prompt-package persistence.
+- Recommendation: Replace the forecast description with the one-day
+  `BuildDailySummary`/facts flow, remove the absent explicit-fetch claim, and
+  narrow each verification paragraph to tests that exist. Coordinate the
+  prompt save/load wording with the dormant-surface decision in `AUD-072`
+  rather than documenting a speculative workflow.
+- Test implications: Documentation correction does not itself require new
+  production tests. Add the Daily identity regression under `AUD-003`; remove
+  save/load-only claims or tests if `AUD-072` retires those APIs.
+- Validation: Every named function and workflow has a production symbol and
+  caller, every claimed focused behavior is discoverable in the listed test
+  package, and internal-document links still resolve.
+- Related findings: `AUD-001`, `AUD-003`, `AUD-072`
+- Remediation reference: pending
+
+### AUD-076: Completed comparison roadmaps duplicate current contracts
+
+- Stage: 24
+- Status: candidate
+- Severity: low
+- Confidence: high
+- Category: documentation
+- Area: `docs/roadmap/profile-comparison.md` and
+  `docs/roadmap/implementation.md`
+- Evidence: Both roadmaps are marked implemented or complete, yet together
+  retain detailed current command syntax, accepted reports and flags, profile
+  count/order, destination selection, bundle layout and manifest fields,
+  failure/publication policy, concurrency, debug behavior, test requirements,
+  and documentation end state. Those volatile contracts are already owned by
+  `docs/cli.md`, `docs/operations.md`,
+  `docs/integrations/comparison-bundle.md`,
+  `docs/integrations/promptkit.md`, and focused comparison internals. The
+  implementation plan itself says the two files should not be archived as a
+  second current-state reference but defers cleanup, while the documentation
+  policy requires completed temporary roadmaps to be removed or archived
+  according to repository practice.
+- Executable authority and canonical documentation owner: Comparison parsing,
+  execution, model validation, and publication code plus the embedded assets
+  are executable authority. The CLI, operations, integration, architecture,
+  and focused-internal documents assigned by
+  `docs/policy/documentation.md` are the canonical reader-facing owners;
+  completed roadmaps own neither current behavior nor durable history.
+- Contract at risk: One volatile fact must have one current documentation
+  owner, and completed roadmaps must not remain parallel reference manuals.
+- Impact: Later command, schema, or publication changes can update canonical
+  documents while leaving two credible, highly detailed stale definitions for
+  maintainers and coding agents.
+- Recommendation: Remove the completed implementation plan and feature roadmap
+  after preserving any durable rationale that is not already in architecture,
+  an ADR, or current contracts. If repository practice requires an archive,
+  reduce it to non-authoritative historical status without the duplicated
+  reference definitions and remove incoming task-guide links.
+- Test implications: No runtime test is required. Validate all incoming local
+  links after retirement and keep current comparison contract tests with their
+  executable owners.
+- Validation: Searches find one canonical definition for each comparison
+  command, artifact, and lifecycle contract; active roadmaps contain only
+  future or audit coordination work; all repository links resolve.
+- Related findings: none
+- Remediation reference: pending
+
+### AUD-077: Concurrent executor substitutability is only implicit
+
+- Stage: 24
+- Status: candidate
+- Severity: low
+- Confidence: high
+- Category: documentation
+- Area: `internal/promptexec.Executor`,
+  `docs/internal/comparison-execution.md`, and
+  `docs/integrations/promptkit.md`
+- Evidence: Comparison starts one goroutine per selected profile and invokes
+  the same `promptexec.Executor` concurrently. The production Promptkit
+  adapter and race-tested fake support that use, and the two documentation
+  owners describe concurrent profile execution. The `Executor` interface
+  comment, however, specifies callback and result behavior without requiring
+  implementations to permit concurrent `Execute` calls. A conforming-looking
+  replacement can therefore be unsafe under an implemented caller pattern
+  that is not part of its written contract.
+- Executable authority and canonical documentation owner: The comparison
+  execution call graph is executable authority for concurrent use;
+  `internal/promptexec.Executor` owns the project interface contract,
+  `docs/internal/comparison-execution.md` owns the internal scheduling flow,
+  and `docs/integrations/promptkit.md` owns the consumer-visible integration
+  boundary.
+- Contract at risk: Every implementation of a shared project-owned interface
+  must know the concurrency behavior required for safe substitution.
+- Impact: A future executor fake or adapter can serialize mutable state without
+  synchronization, pass ordinary single-report tests, and race or corrupt
+  comparison execution.
+- Recommendation: State on `Executor` that comparison may call `Execute`
+  concurrently and implementations must be safe for that use. Add a concise
+  linked statement to comparison internals; keep backend capacity policy in
+  the Promptkit integration owner rather than duplicating it in the interface.
+- Test implications: Retain the race-enabled comparison test with one shared
+  executor. New adapters should run that contract or an equivalent focused
+  concurrent-call test; no timing-only assertion is needed.
+- Validation: The interface and internal guide explicitly state the concurrent
+  call requirement, the Promptkit adapter remains race-clean, and single-report
+  executors retain unchanged behavior.
+- Related findings: `AUD-058`
+- Remediation reference: pending
+
+### AUD-078: Configuration normalization and timezone bounds are underdocumented
+
+- Stage: 24
+- Status: candidate
+- Severity: low
+- Confidence: high
+- Category: documentation
+- Area: `internal/report.IDForConfigKey`,
+  `internal/timeutil.parseUTCOffset`, and `docs/config.md`
+- Evidence: The configuration reference says supported report keys treat
+  hyphens and underscores as equivalent. The executable lookup additionally
+  trims leading/trailing whitespace and folds case before normalization, and
+  focused lookup tests preserve that compatibility. The timezone reference
+  gives numeric-offset examples but no accepted bound; executable parsing
+  accepts signed hour forms or `HH:MM` through `23:59` and rejects larger hour
+  or minute components. These are accepted-value and validation rules owned by
+  configuration documentation, not incidental internal mechanics.
+- Executable authority and canonical documentation owner: Report config-key
+  lookup in `internal/report` and timezone parsing in `internal/timeutil` are
+  executable authority. `docs/config.md` owns user-selectable configuration
+  values, normalization, and validation bounds.
+- Contract at risk: Operators and compatibility reviewers need the canonical
+  configuration reference to describe the complete accepted spelling and
+  numeric range for user-controlled values.
+- Impact: A configuration can rely on accepted case/whitespace normalization
+  without that compatibility being visible, and an offset can fail near the
+  parser boundary without the reference explaining the valid range. A later
+  cleanup could also narrow these behaviors as apparently undocumented
+  implementation details.
+- Recommendation: Document trimming, case folding, and hyphen/underscore
+  equivalence for report keys, and state the signed numeric offset grammar and
+  current `23:59` component bound. If the unusually broad offset range is not
+  intended product policy, narrow code and docs together in a separately
+  reviewed behavior change rather than silently changing it during
+  documentation remediation.
+- Test implications: Existing report lookup and timezone parsing tests remain
+  executable owners. Add only a documentation-validation assertion if the
+  repository later automates reference extraction; do not duplicate parser
+  tables in a prose test.
+- Validation: Every documented report-key spelling and offset boundary is
+  accepted, representative out-of-range offsets are rejected, and the
+  configuration reference agrees with focused parser tests.
+- Related findings: none
+- Remediation reference: pending
+
 ## Retained Decisions
 
 ### RET-001: Keep the application package as the explicit composition owner
@@ -3897,6 +4137,45 @@ reference-bearing option is introduced, give module options an owner-defined
 clone contract and make the registry/construction test prove every registered
 shape participates.
 
+### RET-059: Keep concise linked summaries at audience boundaries
+
+The README's one-command orientation, development task router, operational
+workflow snippets, configuration cross-references, template identity table,
+and integration links repeat only enough stable context for their audience and
+then point to the assigned canonical owner. Some identifiers necessarily
+appear in both executable assets and their owning explanation, while module,
+prompt, template, and schema names also appear where maintainers must keep a
+cross-contract pairing aligned. This is useful navigation, not parallel
+reference maintenance. Retain these short summaries and links; do not copy
+complete flag, field, schema, status, or path tables into non-owning documents.
+
+### RET-060: Keep intended safety contracts authoritative while fixing code
+
+Several earlier findings are executable violations of correctly stated
+architecture, operations, integration, or artifact contracts: Weather API and
+Distributor endpoint/diagnostic safety, prompt/schema/catalog alignment,
+ordinary output preservation and cancellation, comparison recognition and
+transaction outcomes, and completed-profile failure identity. Rewriting those
+documents to advertise the unsafe or internally inconsistent behavior would
+turn defects into contracts. Retain the intended canonical statement, repair
+the executable authority under `AUD-011`, `AUD-012`, `AUD-029` through
+`AUD-031`, `AUD-036` through `AUD-040`, `AUD-043` through `AUD-050`, and
+`AUD-053` through `AUD-058`, and review the owner in the same remediation for
+any clarified limits or compatibility effect.
+
+### RET-061: Keep guarantee language bounded to implemented scopes
+
+Current documents use atomic and transactional language for completed-file or
+directory namespace visibility and rollback; none promises file or parent
+directory synchronization against power loss. Promptkit documentation assigns
+backend capacity to Promptkit and describes concurrent human-selected profile
+sets without promising arbitrary fan-out performance. The release procedure
+names the six produced OS/architecture binaries without converting that build
+matrix into a broader host-capability promise for every filesystem test.
+Retain these bounded statements. Introduce crash durability, a profile-count
+service level, or a supported-platform policy only with executable evidence
+and an explicitly assigned owner.
+
 ## Open Questions
 
 No Stage 1 open questions or unexplained baseline failures remain.
@@ -4310,6 +4589,24 @@ Stage 23 routed these investigation leads to their assigned later stages:
   rejection and commit-time authorization in their current safety owners.
   Stage 26 must sequence those behavior fixes before extracting helpers.
 
+Stage 24 routed these investigation leads to their assigned later stages:
+
+- Stage 25 should validate the documented accepted/rejected configuration and
+  CLI examples through the executable boundary while exercising its broader
+  adversarial corpus; Stage 24 found no reason to add live-provider or
+  credential-dependent documentation checks.
+- Stage 26 should remediate `AUD-074`, `AUD-075`, `AUD-077`, and `AUD-078`
+  beside their executable owners so help, interface comments, tests, and
+  canonical docs change together. It should retire the two completed
+  comparison roadmaps under `AUD-076` only after checking every incoming link.
+- Remediation of earlier implementation findings must preserve the intended
+  canonical safety contract under `RET-060`; do not rewrite documentation to
+  legitimize current leakage, cancellation, recognition, identity, or
+  publication defects.
+- Dormant APIs and broad render surfaces remain current executable facts until
+  Stage 26 decides `AUD-069`/`AUD-072`. Their focused docs should narrow or
+  disappear with that code change, not ahead of it.
+
 ## Stage Log
 
 ### Stage 1: Establish The Baseline And Audit Ledger
@@ -5599,3 +5896,61 @@ Stage 23 routed these investigation leads to their assigned later stages:
 - Retained decisions: `RET-053` through `RET-058`.
 - Open questions: the four leads recorded above are routed to their assigned
   later stages.
+
+### Stage 24: Audit Documentation Coherence And Executable Contracts
+
+- Status: Complete.
+- Scope reviewed: `README.md`, all current-state, policy, integration,
+  internal, ADR, release, release-note, and roadmap documents under `docs/`,
+  all three maintained examples, executable CLI help, configuration/report/time
+  parsing, embedded prompt/profile/schema/template assets, focused test
+  inventories, local and external links, fenced examples, sensitive-value
+  patterns, and every documentation lead routed from Stages 3-23.
+- Exclusions: no canonical document, executable help, interface comment,
+  production code, test, example, or completed roadmap was remediated. Dynamic
+  adversarial validation remains Stage 25; consolidation and remediation
+  sequencing remain Stages 26-27.
+
+#### Documentation And Executable-Authority Accounting
+
+| Topic | Executable authority, canonical documentation owner, and evidence | Disposition |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Product orientation and contributor routing | `cmd/weatherreporter` and the assembled workflow establish the product; `README.md` owns the concise orientation and `docs/development.md` owns task routing/package inventory. Their summaries link onward and do not reproduce complete volatile references. | Coherent linked summaries under `RET-059`. |
+| CLI commands, flags, output, and dispatch | `internal/cli/root.go` and `writeActionResult` are executable authority; `docs/cli.md` owns the public contract and `docs/internal/cli.md` owns mechanics. Date/quiet help and comparison-dispatch statements disagree under `AUD-074`; accepted actions, report/date matrix, paths, summary fields, and failure exits otherwise match. | Partly insufficient; exact owners recorded in `AUD-074`. |
+| Configuration fields, defaults, and examples | Config structs/defaults/loading/validation, `report.IDForConfigKey`, `timeutil.LoadLocation`, and the Promptkit adapter are executable authority; `docs/config.md` owns field behavior and `examples/` owns complete files. Defaults, precedence, fields, active/inactive validation, report/module IDs, profile precedence, and all three loaded/inspected examples match. Report-key normalization and numeric-offset bounds are incomplete under `AUD-078`. | Partly insufficient; exact owners recorded in `AUD-078`. |
+| Report, module, prompt, profile, schema, and template identities | Report/briefing/generated-text registries and embedded prompt/profile/schema/template assets are executable authority; focused internal docs, `docs/templates.md`, and `docs/integrations/promptkit.md` own their reader-facing explanations. The four report/prompt/schema/template pairs, prompt version `2.0.0`, profile defaults/models, module catalog/compositions, partials, and schema fields match. Dormant/broad surfaces remain truthful current code until `AUD-069`/`AUD-072` remediation. | Coherent; no duplicate retirement finding. |
+| Weather API and Distributor integrations | Config and both adapters plus the pinned Distributor module are executable authority; `docs/integrations/weatherapi.md`, `docs/integrations/distributor/`, and `docs/config.md` own wire and selection contracts. Endpoint paths/queries, envelopes, availability, retry statuses, bundle mappings, pinned version, upload/status flow, and logical paths match. Unsupported schemes and unsafe diagnostics violate intended contracts under `AUD-011`, `AUD-012`, and `AUD-048` through `AUD-050`; those executable owners should change, with canonical docs reviewed together under `RET-060`. | Earlier implementation findings retained; no duplicate documentation finding. |
+| Prompt and rendering safety contracts | Embedded prompt/schema/template assets, prompt-input/validator/catalog code, and app preparation are executable authority; Promptkit integration, prompt-input/generated-text internals, template docs, and architecture own the written contracts. `AUD-029` through `AUD-031`, `AUD-036` through `AUD-040`, and `AUD-043`/`AUD-044` identify executable violations of correctly stated curation, identity, schema, and preflight expectations. | Repair executable owners and review canonical owners together under `RET-060`; do not document defects as supported behavior. |
+| Output and comparison publication contracts | `internal/fileutil`, app publication, and `internal/comparison` are executable authority; `docs/cli.md`, `docs/operations.md`, `docs/integrations/comparison-bundle.md`, comparison internals, and architecture are canonical owners. `AUD-045`, `AUD-047`, and `AUD-053` through `AUD-056` identify executable violations of stated target-type, cancellation, recognition, filename, and recovery guarantees. Current atomic language promises namespace visibility, not power-loss durability. | Repair executable owners under `RET-060`; bounded terminology retained under `RET-061`. |
+| Comparison execution and result identity | App scheduling/result projection is executable authority; CLI, Promptkit/comparison integration, and comparison internals own the written behavior. `AUD-058` owns the existing mixed failure/cancellation violation; `AUD-077` records the missing concurrent-call substitutability requirement. Current docs correctly avoid an arbitrary profile-count performance promise. | Partly insufficient under `AUD-077`; prior defect remains `AUD-058`; scaling scope retained under `RET-061`. |
+| Focused internal flows and verification claims | Package symbols, callers, and `go test -list` inventories are executable authority; matching files under `docs/internal/` own implementation descriptions. Forecast, collection, report, and prompt-input claims name absent APIs/flows/tests under `AUD-075`; remaining internal flows agree with caller traces and focused suites. | Partly insufficient; exact owners recorded in `AUD-075`. |
+| Roadmap, ADR, release-note, and release lifecycle | Documentation policy is the lifecycle authority. The accepted stateless ADR and versioned release notes are clearly historical, the release procedure owns current publication steps, and `docs/roadmap/future.md` labels proposals unimplemented. The implemented comparison roadmap and completed plan instead duplicate current volatile references under `AUD-076`. The active audit plan/ledger remain temporary coordination records. | Partly insufficient under `AUD-076`; historical distinctions otherwise coherent. |
+| Links, examples, fences, and sensitive content | Every repository-relative Markdown link resolves; both external reference links returned HTTP 200; every fence is balanced and language-tagged. Maintained examples use synthetic `.example.com` endpoints or loopback, contain no credential values, and passed their owning suites. Security-pattern review found mechanisms/placeholders and the intentionally public module host, not private credentials, keys, environment dumps, or undisclosed infrastructure. | Coherent. |
+
+#### Commands And Evidence
+
+- Inventoried 46 documentation/example files and read every current-state
+  canonical owner, internal guide, maintained example, policy, ADR, release
+  procedure/note, and roadmap status relevant to Stage 24. Used prior-stage
+  findings for code behavior and graph search/snippets/traces only to resolve
+  disputed symbols, callers, and concurrency requirements.
+- Compared root and comparison help with the public/internal CLI owners; ran
+  focused CLI and report test inventories; confirmed the missing forecast
+  symbol and absent explicit collection flow; and checked embedded prompt,
+  profile, schema, and template identities against their documentation.
+- Ran focused configuration, Promptkit-adapter, report, and CLI suites; all
+  passed, including the maintained-example checks. A local-link checker found
+  no missing targets, a fence checker found no untagged or unclosed fences,
+  and both external NOAA/SPC references returned HTTP 200.
+- Searched docs/examples for credentials, keys, tokens, authorization values,
+  endpoints, and private infrastructure. Only documented placeholders,
+  environment-variable names, synthetic endpoints, loopback, public upstream
+  references, and the repository's intentionally public module host appeared.
+- Ran `go test ./...`, `go vet ./...`,
+  `go run ./cmd/weatherreporter --help`,
+  `go run ./cmd/weatherreporter compare --help`, and `git diff --check`; all
+  passed.
+- Findings: `AUD-074` through `AUD-078`.
+- Retained decisions: `RET-059` through `RET-061`.
+- Open questions: none; remediation and dynamic-validation leads are routed
+  above without changing later-stage scope.