Files
scriptorium/docs/policy/oss.md

140 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown

# Open Source Licensing And Attribution Policy
**Base Policy Version:** 1.1
**Last Updated:** 2026-09-26
## Purpose And Scope
This policy establishes a repeatable House Format for open source attribution
and license notices. It covers upstream components incorporated into or
distributed with the project, including relevant transitive dependencies and
copied code or assets. Treatment follows the component's terms and actual use,
rather than its classification as a direct dependency.
The baseline is a publicly available source repository with releases published
alongside it. The format is independent of language, forge, and build system.
It does not require attribution for every development tool, establish license
compatibility, or resolve obligations beyond attribution and notice handling.
## Canonical Locations
The [documentation policy](documentation.md) assigns ownership:
- `LICENSE` contains the project's own license. Dependency attribution does
not relicense the project.
- `docs/oss/attribution.md` contains the canonical component entries.
- `docs/oss/licenses/` contains complete, verbatim standard license texts,
including companion texts where applicable.
Use recognizable license filenames, such as `Apache-2.0.txt` or `LGPL-3.0.txt`.
A shared standard text may serve multiple entries. Keep explanations outside
license texts and preserve distinct versions and exceptions.
## House Format
Each component entry has five fields:
1. **Project name**, normally as the entry heading.
2. **Upstream copyright statement or statements**, preserving their wording.
3. **SPDX license identifier or expression**, when applicable.
4. **License and notice links**, covering the applicable standard texts and
upstream project-specific material.
5. **Source repository link**, identifying the source corresponding to the
imported version.
Illustrative Markdown, with placeholders for the actual upstream information:
```markdown
## Example Library
Copyright <upstream copyright statement>
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
License and notices: [Apache 2.0](licenses/Apache-2.0.txt) | [NOTICE](<upstream NOTICE URL at the imported commit>)
Source: [Example Library](<upstream repository URL at the imported commit>)
```
These are five fields, not a line limit. Include multiple statements and links
where needed. Omit the SPDX field when no applicable identifier exists; identify
nonstandard terms accurately through the linked text. Preserve licensing
alternatives and exceptions, and record a selected option when relevant. Do not
invent an identifier or silently resolve an unsettled licensing choice.
## License Texts And Upstream Links
Link standard license texts to their local copies. Link project-specific
notices to the upstream copies instead of storing them locally. Every upstream
repository or notice link must identify the exact commit corresponding to the
imported version, including the selected source revision for copied material.
Do not use moving branches or version tags as substitutes for that commit.
Classify material by its contents, not its filename. An upstream `LICENSE`,
`COPYING`, or similar file may contain project-specific notices or exceptions
in addition to standard wording. Link both the local standard text and the
commit-specific upstream file when needed. Make companion license texts directly
reachable from the entry rather than leaving readers to infer their location.
For project-specific license and attribution material, this policy accepts
direct links to the applicable upstream texts as satisfying reproduction,
inclusion, or copy requirements. This is the adopted house interpretation.
Agents must apply it without adding local-copy requirements or seeking repeated
approval solely because a license uses those terms.
This interpretation concerns notice reproduction. Concrete obligations such as
marking modified files or supplying corresponding source receive their own
applicable treatment. Preserve required notices already present in incorporated
source files; the central attribution entry does not authorize stripping them.
## Discoverability
End the project's README with two friendly statements linking to its actual
license and the attribution document. For Scriptorium:
```markdown
Scriptorium is licensed under the [BSD 3-Clause License](LICENSE).
[Open Source attribution notices](docs/oss/attribution.md) are available.
```
Each new checked-in release document and its hosted download page must end
with links whose visible text is `LICENSE | ATTRIBUTION`. Use absolute URLs to
those files at the release's immutable tag or corresponding immutable source
revision so the links work in both locations. This release navigation is distinct
from upstream component links, which must use the imported commit.
Reuse the checked-in release document as the hosted release body where supported.
The release procedure owns concrete URLs and publication mechanics for delivering
the links through the selected channel. Do not maintain duplicate notice lists.
These conventions do not by themselves require separate downloadable license
assets, source bundles, or a different binary package format.
## Maintenance And Exceptions
Update notices in the change that adds, removes, upgrades, copies, or changes
the distribution of a relevant component. Check the selected source's license
and notices rather than assuming they are unchanged. Update affected entries,
commit links, and texts; retain historical versions through Git.
Check affected statements, faithful standard-text copies, and link destinations
as part of ordinary change review. For a future release tag, check intended file
paths against the candidate source; the tag need not resolve remotely before
publication. Do not add publication-time network checks, CI polling, recurring
legal sign-offs, mandatory scanners, or a full software bill of materials merely
to implement this policy.
Use the House Format routinely. Raise an exception only for a concrete obligation
or unresolved rights question it does not address, including any arising from a
particular distribution channel. Record the issue and selected treatment in the
adopted policy or affected attribution entry as appropriate. Resolve the issue
before the affected use or distribution without reopening settled choices.
Common ownership of projects is neither required nor a blanket exception.
Apply the formatting convention prospectively. Do not rewrite published tags,
notes, binaries, or checksums to retrofit it. Address actual omissions deliberately
under the applicable terms and the [release correction policy](release.md#immutability-and-failure-recovery).
Ordinary attribution maintenance and release links are preparation work, not new
release approval gates.