Files
promptkit/docs/roadmap/implementation.md

313 lines
19 KiB
Markdown

# Public Facade Refactor Implementation Plan
## Scope And Authority
Implement the [public facade roadmap](public-facade.md) without changing the
consumer API or execution behavior. This plan owns implementation sequence;
the feature roadmap owns the target state and compatibility requirements.
The provisional [profile policy](profile-policy.md) is a separate, subsequent
scope. Do not update catalog dependencies, introduce standard profiles, change
profile stability promises, or prepare a release in these stages.
Read `AGENTS.md`, the [development guide](../development.md), and all three
policies before starting: [architecture](../policy/architecture.md),
[documentation](../policy/documentation.md), and [testing](../policy/testing.md).
Use existing GoDoc and canonical consumer/format documentation to distinguish
intentional contracts from incidental implementation. If a relocation appears
to require a consumer-facing change, stop and report it rather than silently
changing the contract. Existing exported declarations are not removal candidates
merely because a guide does not mention them.
Each numbered stage is one implementation prompt. Complete stages in order;
keep the repository building and maintain one active production path after
each stage. Update affected durable documentation when its described ownership
changes, rather than leaving inaccurate descriptions until the final stage.
For each stage, run focused tests while developing and the complete
[maintainer validation workflow](../development.md#maintainer-validation)
before acceptance. Report changes, validation results, and any unresolved
failures. Do not use live providers, credentials, sibling repositories, module
replacements, or a Go workspace to validate the result.
## Implementation Decisions
- Add `internal/engine` as the composition owner. It owns engine construction,
defaults, source assembly, catalog loading, registry and capacity construction,
and runner/repairer wiring. It delegates execution to `internal/usecase`;
it does not become a second runner.
- Keep root-defined public types, errors, options, conversions, collaborator
adapters, and formatting. Root `Engine` holds a private `*engine.Engine`.
The internal engine exposes only the domain-level operations needed for
the existing facade methods. No public bridge methods or internal aliases.
- Preserve root `Option` and its sealed `apply(*engineOptions) error` mechanism.
Ultimately, private root `engineOptions` wraps an internal `engine.Options`
value whose private state and setters own source construction and option
accumulation. Root options remain closures applying in caller order; do not
replace them with a deferred list that changes when errors or copies occur.
- Put the memory profile repository in `internal/profile`. Existing domain,
profile validation, and JSON-copy helpers remain the owners of their rules.
Do not duplicate validation in the facade and repository.
- Keep public error classification and redacted public error construction in
the root. Internal construction returns descriptive errors; `NewEngine`
translates construction failures to `ErrInvalidConfig` as it does today.
Runtime errors continue through `mapPublicError` at the public boundary.
- Keep `PreparedExecution` root-defined with its existing private use-case
handle. Pass that internal handle through engine delegation without copying
its execution state or creating another lifecycle owner. Private root
references to specialized internal packages are allowed.
- Do not impose a single internal import on the root, introduce a generic
builder framework, add caching, broaden validation, or migrate all private
helpers merely to reduce root line count. Straightforward public convenience
constructors and boundary conversions may remain where they are.
## Stage 1: Establish The Compatibility Baseline
Purpose: make the compatibility review concrete before moving ownership.
1. Read the root declarations and tests, the
[consumer guide](../consumers/pkg-promptkit.md),
[component overview](../internal/overview.md),
[sources document](../internal/sources.md), and
[runner document](../internal/runner.md). Identify existing contract coverage
for constructor options, profile sources, injection, errors, and prepared
execution. Read their owning internal tests before adding new coverage.
2. Record the pre-refactor commit ID in this plan and capture an exported API
inventory for the final comparison. Include exported declarations, named
types, fields and tags, interface signatures, value and pointer method sets,
constants, error variables, and serialization/formatting contracts. `go doc
-all` is a useful starting point, not a complete method-set comparison.
Temporary comparison output belongs outside tracked source; do not introduce
a permanent snapshot of private structure or freeze every future API addition.
3. Use existing tests first. Add only missing, consequential public regression
coverage for relocation risks: source replacement versus backend accumulation,
option application/capture timing, ownership of injected values and profiles,
nil/zero facade behavior, and typed error translation. Keep public behavior
tests in the external test package where practical. Do not duplicate full
source, transport, capacity, or runner matrices.
4. In particular, inspect the existing contracts around `WithProfiles` copying
during option application and `WithBackend` capturing the queue-capacity
pointer value during option creation. Preserve explicit zero versus unset.
Keep errors from an invalid earlier option observable even if a later option
would replace it. Do not add reflection-based typed-nil rejection or eagerly
read lazy consumer sources as part of the refactor.
Acceptance: the pre-refactor baseline is identified, necessary regression
coverage passes, and no production ownership or behavior has changed. If the
existing tests already cover these risks, do not add tests solely to fill this
stage; record the coverage reviewed and proceed.
### Completion
- [x] Pre-refactor baseline commit: `7a858c2365e1a3625de67a46f5c488e0fe31856b`.
- [x] Captured the exported API inventory outside the tracked repository for
the final comparison.
- [x] Reviewed existing public coverage for source replacement, backend
accumulation, option error and capture timing, injected-value and profile
ownership, nil and zero facade behavior, prepared execution, and typed error
translation. The existing tests cover these relocation risks without a
duplicate matrix.
## Stage 2: Relocate The Memory Profile Repository
Purpose: move a self-contained repository before changing engine assembly.
1. Introduce `internal/profile.NewMemoryRepository` accepting internal profile
definitions. Move the map-backed repository and lookup implementation from
root `profiles.go` to that package. Preserve normalized duplicate-ID detection,
definition validation, missing-profile classification, inheritance metadata,
and independently owned values on storage and lookup.
2. Separate public field conversion from repository normalization as necessary.
Root `WithProfiles` converts at application time and invokes the new internal
constructor. Use the existing definition-normalization and JSON-copy owners
once at the repository boundary; preserve rejection of invalid extra values
and deep-copy guarantees without an unnecessary second validation pass.
Audit other callers before changing the responsibilities of `toDomainProfile`.
3. Remove the root repository implementation. Leave public `Profile` and
`OpenAICompatibleProfile` unchanged, including the convenience constructor's
documented copy behavior; do not strengthen that contract incidentally.
4. Move private repository tests to `internal/profile`, adapting inputs to
internal values. Retain representative public `WithProfiles` integration and
conversion coverage at the root. Add only uncovered copy/validation cases.
Update the internal source document and inventory for the new owner.
Acceptance: `WithProfiles` uses the internal repository in the active engine;
public behavior is unchanged and no duplicate root repository remains.
### Completion
- [x] Moved the in-memory repository, normalization, validation, and defensive
copies into `internal/profile`.
- [x] Kept public conversion and `WithProfiles` application timing at the root.
- [x] Moved focused repository coverage to `internal/profile` and retained
facade-level copy timing coverage.
- [x] Updated the implemented component and source ownership documentation.
## Stage 3: Move Engine Assembly And Delegation Inward
Purpose: establish the internal engine while leaving source-option relocation
for the next prompt.
1. Add internal `Config`, `Options`, and `Engine` types. Internal `Config` carries
the existing construction settings, not a new consumer configuration API.
For this stage, `Options` may carry the already-prepared collaborators,
repositories, backend definitions, and source-presence flags from the root
option state. Do not lose distinctions between an absent source and an
explicitly supplied empty source. Stage 4 removes this transitional mapping.
2. Move the assembly portion of root `NewEngine`, after option application,
into `internal/engine.New`, including maintained module imports and
`newProfileRepository`. Preserve the existing assembly semantics:
- prompt-source requirement and configured source defaults;
- validated maintained catalogs and engine-local backend registry;
- raw profile precedence: memory, ordinary configured source, application
fallback, maintained catalog; an explicit ordinary source replaces
`Config.ProfileDir`, and one resolver wraps the complete overlay;
- schema default and supplied validator selection;
- supplied or default client and artifact reader selection; and
- one capacity manager per engine, one capacity wrapper around the selected
client, and that same wrapped client used by runner and repairer.
3. Give internal `Engine` domain-level forwarding methods for the existing
prepare, run, prepared-execution, and inspection operations. Keep runner
orchestration and prepared-handle lifecycle in `internal/usecase`. Do not
add another queue, retry loop, mutex, source cache, or execution state machine.
4. Change root `Engine` to hold the internal engine. Root `NewEngine` still
applies options and maps constructor errors. Root methods still check
nil/zero receivers, convert/validate public requests at their existing
boundary, convert results, and translate runtime errors. Do not wrap an
error twice or expose internal typed provider errors instead of public ones.
5. Adapt tests that inspect private runner fields to the new owner or, where
feasible, observable contract assertions. Reuse existing tests for prepared
handle engine binding, shared copied-handle state, consumption/discard,
cancellation, redaction, repair, and capacity. Add an assembly test only if
a consequential wiring obligation is otherwise untested.
6. Update architecture, component inventory, sources, and runner documentation
to describe the implemented split. Remove the superseded root assembly path.
Acceptance: all public operations route through one internal engine and the
existing runner; maintained catalogs and component wiring are internally owned.
Prepared-execution behavior and public error contracts remain unchanged.
### Completion
- [x] Added `internal/engine` as the owner of engine assembly and runner
delegation.
- [x] Kept the public facade's option application, conversions, nil checks,
prepared-execution wrapper, and error translation at the root.
- [x] Updated architecture, component, source, and runner documentation for
the implemented ownership split.
## Stage 4: Move Option State And Source Construction Inward
Purpose: finish the ownership split without changing the public option API.
1. Replace the root collaborator/flag record with a private wrapper around
`engine.Options`. Move the construction state into private fields of that
internal type. Remove Stage 3's transitional root-to-internal state mapping.
Internal setters correspond to the existing source, profile, backend, client,
and artifact options; no generic option registry or callback framework.
2. Move filesystem/`fs.FS` repository and validator construction, `fileSource`,
source-presence flags, replacement rules, and backend accumulation into
internal option methods. Invoke them during each root option's `apply`, not
collectively after all options. Preserve current file checks and lazy source
loading; do not add path restrictions or normalize actual paths beyond the
existing contract. Preserve separate blank checks for whitespace-bearing
valid paths.
3. Keep public-to-internal conversion and public collaborator adapters at the
root. Preserve closure capture and validation timing from Stage 1, including
queue-capacity capture, profile copies, nil options, and ordinary interface
nil checks. Internal methods consume internal values/interfaces without
importing root types. Do not copy injected client or reader implementations.
4. Root `NewEngine` now performs only ordered option application, configuration
translation, internal construction, and public error translation. Review the
remaining root imports/helpers: retain boundary work, remove dead assembly
helpers, and do not relocate formatting or conversion for appearance alone.
5. Move implementation-only option/source setup tests with their owner, while
retaining public timing and error assertions at the facade. Update affected
documentation immediately. No exact private field layout becomes a test
requirement.
Acceptance: the root no longer constructs repositories, validators, registries,
capacity managers, catalogs, or runners. Public options still have their existing
names, signatures, ordering, capture, and error behavior. No transitional state
mapping or duplicate source-assembly path remains.
### Completion
- [x] Wrapped the root option state around internal engine options with private
construction state.
- [x] Moved filesystem and file source setup, source replacement, profile
repository construction, validator construction, and backend accumulation
into internal option methods.
- [x] Kept ordered public option application, boundary conversion, collaborator
adaptation, and error translation in the root facade.
- [x] Updated current architecture and internal ownership documentation.
## Stage 5: Guard The Public Boundary And Dependency Direction
Purpose: protect the intended architecture without freezing private layout.
1. Add a focused root architecture test using Go type information. Load the
compiled root package with standard-library `go list` export data and
`go/importer`/`go/types`; avoid a new production dependency or parsing only
surface syntax. It must work in the ordinary offline maintainer workflow
once normal module dependencies are available.
2. Inspect exported declarations, public field types, function signatures,
interface methods, and both pointer and value method sets. Follow nested
type expressions and aliases with a visited set to avoid recursion. Reject
references to this module's internal types in accessible public surfaces,
public aliases to those types, and internal anonymous embedding that exposes
implementation methods. Account for generics if encountered rather than
silently ignoring their signatures or constraints.
3. Permit private internal fields and the sealed `Option` method. Do not follow
inaccessible fields as if they were public contracts or reject all aliases
indiscriminately. Check accessible promoted methods even if the embedded
field itself is unexported. Do not require the root to import only
`internal/engine`, or impose rules on unrelated third-party internals.
4. Check production package imports, using package metadata, for any dependency
from this module's `internal/` packages to its root. Exclude external test
packages from that restriction. Do not assert an exact internal package list.
5. Exercise the boundary checker with a small in-memory fixture set: allowed
private internal state and sealed option; forbidden direct/nested internal
signature or field; forbidden internal alias and promoted method. Keep the
test helper local and proportionate, not a reusable architecture framework.
Acceptance: the completed refactor passes the checks; representative violations
fail for the intended reason, and ordinary private implementation changes remain
possible. No ConfigKit checkout or other sibling is needed.
## Stage 6: Complete Compatibility And Documentation Review
Purpose: verify the whole refactor, not just successful compilation of each move.
1. Compare the final exported API against the Stage 1 commit, including method
sets, fields/tags, type ownership, interfaces, and public error identities.
Review any difference; no API additions/removals/redesigns are authorized.
Inspect supported serialization and formatting alongside the existing tests.
2. Review the final root package for retained business assembly or duplicated
repositories, and the internal engine for duplicated runner behavior. Review
test moves for lost assertions and duplicate matrices. Existing specialized
packages should still own their detailed behavior tests; facade tests should
prove conversion, compatibility, and representative assembled behavior.
3. Finish the durable documentation review: architecture owns dependency rules;
the internal overview inventories owners; sources and runner docs explain
their current implementation. Correct stale links and root-assembly claims.
Keep public GoDoc authoritative and avoid adding consumer migration steps,
format rules, or new guarantees for an internal relocation. No separate ADR
is needed merely to restate the existing facade policy.
4. Run the entire maintainer workflow, including race tests, vet, build, both
offline examples, formatting, local links, and repository hygiene checks.
Review the complete diff against the baseline. Report any environmental
validation blocker explicitly; do not call an unrun check successful.
5. Report completion against the feature roadmap criteria. Retain these two
temporary documents for the maintainer's completion review; their later
retirement follows documentation policy. Do not start the profile-policy
work or tag a release as part of this plan.
Acceptance: compatibility review finds no unauthorized changes, all required
validation passes, documentation matches the implemented architecture, and the
refactor is ready for independent review before subsequent feature work.
## Open Questions
None requiring a product decision for this scope. The refactor preserves the
existing API and behavior; the provisional catalog policy and its release
decisions remain outside this plan.