Prepare Audita v2.0.1 release notes

.woodpecker/release.yml

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ steps:
       files:
         - dist/audita-*-linux-amd64
         - dist/audita-*-linux-arm64
+      note: docs/releases/${CI_COMMIT_TAG}.md
       checksum: sha256
       checksum-file: SHA256SUMS
       checksum-flatten: true

AGENTS.md

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-Please review `docs/development.md` for initial orientation in this repository
-and follow its task-specific reading guide.
+Start with `docs/development.md` for orientation and use its policy reading guide
+to select the policies applicable to the task. Do not read the entire suite by
+default.
 
-Review and follow `docs/policy/agents.md` before recommending, planning, or implementing any changes to this repository.
+Read and follow `docs/policy/agents.md` before recommending, planning, or
+implementing repository changes.

COPYRIGHT

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Audita
+
+Copyright (C) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
+
+Audita is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+(at your option) any later version.
+
+The GNU General Public License version 3 is provided in LICENSE.
+
+Audita is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+Third-party code and assets are subject to their respective license terms.
+
+Policy documents and guidance adapted from Standard Repository Policies
+remain licensed under CC-BY-SA-4.0. See docs/oss/attribution.md for the
+affected material, upstream credit, and license links.

LICENSE

@@ -1,11 +1,674 @@
-Copyright (c) 2026 Eric Rakestraw. 
+                    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+                       Version 3, 29 June 2007
 
-Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
+ Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <https://fsf.org/>
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
+ of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
 
-1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+                            Preamble
 
-2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
+  The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
+software and other kinds of works.
 
-3. Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
+  The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
+to take away your freedom to share and change the works.  By contrast,
+the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
+share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free
+software for all its users.  We, the Free Software Foundation, use the
+GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to
+any other work released this way by its authors.  You can apply it to
+your programs, too.
 
-THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
+price.  Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
+have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
+them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
+want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
+free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
+
+  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
+these rights or asking you to surrender the rights.  Therefore, you have
+certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
+you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
+
+  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
+gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
+freedoms that you received.  You must make sure that they, too, receive
+or can get the source code.  And you must show them these terms so they
+know their rights.
+
+  Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
+(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
+giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
+
+  For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
+that there is no warranty for this free software.  For both users' and
+authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
+changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
+authors of previous versions.
+
+  Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
+modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer
+can do so.  This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
+protecting users' freedom to change the software.  The systematic
+pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
+use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable.  Therefore, we
+have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
+products.  If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
+stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
+of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
+
+  Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
+States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
+software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to
+avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could
+make it effectively proprietary.  To prevent this, the GPL assures that
+patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
+
+  The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
+modification follow.
+
+                       TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+  0. Definitions.
+
+  "This License" refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License.
+
+  "Copyright" also means copyright-like laws that apply to other kinds of
+works, such as semiconductor masks.
+
+  "The Program" refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this
+License.  Each licensee is addressed as "you".  "Licensees" and
+"recipients" may be individuals or organizations.
+
+  To "modify" a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work
+in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an
+exact copy.  The resulting work is called a "modified version" of the
+earlier work or a work "based on" the earlier work.
+
+  A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work based
+on the Program.
+
+  To "propagate" a work means to do anything with it that, without
+permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for
+infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a
+computer or modifying a private copy.  Propagation includes copying,
+distribution (with or without modification), making available to the
+public, and in some countries other activities as well.
+
+  To "convey" a work means any kind of propagation that enables other
+parties to make or receive copies.  Mere interaction with a user through
+a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying.
+
+  An interactive user interface displays "Appropriate Legal Notices"
+to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible
+feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice, and (2)
+tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to the
+extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may convey the
+work under this License, and how to view a copy of this License.  If
+the interface presents a list of user commands or options, such as a
+menu, a prominent item in the list meets this criterion.
+
+  1. Source Code.
+
+  The "source code" for a work means the preferred form of the work
+for making modifications to it.  "Object code" means any non-source
+form of a work.
+
+  A "Standard Interface" means an interface that either is an official
+standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in the case of
+interfaces specified for a particular programming language, one that
+is widely used among developers working in that language.
+
+  The "System Libraries" of an executable work include anything, other
+than the work as a whole, that (a) is included in the normal form of
+packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that Major
+Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work with that
+Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an
+implementation is available to the public in source code form.  A
+"Major Component", in this context, means a major essential component
+(kernel, window system, and so on) of the specific operating system
+(if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to
+produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it.
+
+  The "Corresponding Source" for a work in object code form means all
+the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable
+work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to
+control those activities.  However, it does not include the work's
+System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free
+programs which are used unmodified in performing those activities but
+which are not part of the work.  For example, Corresponding Source
+includes interface definition files associated with source files for
+the work, and the source code for shared libraries and dynamically
+linked subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require,
+such as by intimate data communication or control flow between those
+subprograms and other parts of the work.
+
+  The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users
+can regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding
+Source.
+
+  The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that
+same work.
+
+  2. Basic Permissions.
+
+  All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of
+copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated
+conditions are met.  This License explicitly affirms your unlimited
+permission to run the unmodified Program.  The output from running a
+covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its
+content, constitutes a covered work.  This License acknowledges your
+rights of fair use or other equivalent, as provided by copyright law.
+
+  You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not
+convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains
+in force.  You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose
+of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you
+with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with
+the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do
+not control copyright.  Those thus making or running the covered works
+for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction
+and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of
+your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you.
+
+  Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under
+the conditions stated below.  Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10
+makes it unnecessary.
+
+  3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
+
+  No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological
+measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article
+11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or
+similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such
+measures.
+
+  When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid
+circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention
+is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to
+the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or
+modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's
+users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of
+technological measures.
+
+  4. Conveying Verbatim Copies.
+
+  You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you
+receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and
+appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice;
+keep intact all notices stating that this License and any
+non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the code;
+keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and give all
+recipients a copy of this License along with the Program.
+
+  You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey,
+and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee.
+
+  5. Conveying Modified Source Versions.
+
+  You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to
+produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the
+terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
+
+    a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified
+    it, and giving a relevant date.
+
+    b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is
+    released under this License and any conditions added under section
+    7.  This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to
+    "keep intact all notices".
+
+    c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this
+    License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy.  This
+    License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7
+    additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts,
+    regardless of how they are packaged.  This License gives no
+    permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not
+    invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.
+
+    d) If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display
+    Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive
+    interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your
+    work need not make them do so.
+
+  A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent
+works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work,
+and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program,
+in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an
+"aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not
+used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users
+beyond what the individual works permit.  Inclusion of a covered work
+in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other
+parts of the aggregate.
+
+  6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
+
+  You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms
+of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the
+machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License,
+in one of these ways:
+
+    a) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
+    (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the
+    Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium
+    customarily used for software interchange.
+
+    b) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
+    (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a
+    written offer, valid for at least three years and valid for as
+    long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product
+    model, to give anyone who possesses the object code either (1) a
+    copy of the Corresponding Source for all the software in the
+    product that is covered by this License, on a durable physical
+    medium customarily used for software interchange, for a price no
+    more than your reasonable cost of physically performing this
+    conveying of source, or (2) access to copy the
+    Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge.
+
+    c) Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of the
+    written offer to provide the Corresponding Source.  This
+    alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially, and
+    only if you received the object code with such an offer, in accord
+    with subsection 6b.
+
+    d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated
+    place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the
+    Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no
+    further charge.  You need not require recipients to copy the
+    Corresponding Source along with the object code.  If the place to
+    copy the object code is a network server, the Corresponding Source
+    may be on a different server (operated by you or a third party)
+    that supports equivalent copying facilities, provided you maintain
+    clear directions next to the object code saying where to find the
+    Corresponding Source.  Regardless of what server hosts the
+    Corresponding Source, you remain obligated to ensure that it is
+    available for as long as needed to satisfy these requirements.
+
+    e) Convey the object code using peer-to-peer transmission, provided
+    you inform other peers where the object code and Corresponding
+    Source of the work are being offered to the general public at no
+    charge under subsection 6d.
+
+  A separable portion of the object code, whose source code is excluded
+from the Corresponding Source as a System Library, need not be
+included in conveying the object code work.
+
+  A "User Product" is either (1) a "consumer product", which means any
+tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, family,
+or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for incorporation
+into a dwelling.  In determining whether a product is a consumer product,
+doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of coverage.  For a particular
+product received by a particular user, "normally used" refers to a
+typical or common use of that class of product, regardless of the status
+of the particular user or of the way in which the particular user
+actually uses, or expects or is expected to use, the product.  A product
+is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial
+commercial, industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent
+the only significant mode of use of the product.
+
+  "Installation Information" for a User Product means any methods,
+procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install
+and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from
+a modified version of its Corresponding Source.  The information must
+suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object
+code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because
+modification has been made.
+
+  If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or
+specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as
+part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the
+User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a
+fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), the
+Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be accompanied
+by the Installation Information.  But this requirement does not apply
+if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install
+modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has
+been installed in ROM).
+
+  The requirement to provide Installation Information does not include a
+requirement to continue to provide support service, warranty, or updates
+for a work that has been modified or installed by the recipient, or for
+the User Product in which it has been modified or installed.  Access to a
+network may be denied when the modification itself materially and
+adversely affects the operation of the network or violates the rules and
+protocols for communication across the network.
+
+  Corresponding Source conveyed, and Installation Information provided,
+in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly
+documented (and with an implementation available to the public in
+source code form), and must require no special password or key for
+unpacking, reading or copying.
+
+  7. Additional Terms.
+
+  "Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of this
+License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions.
+Additional permissions that are applicable to the entire Program shall
+be treated as though they were included in this License, to the extent
+that they are valid under applicable law.  If additional permissions
+apply only to part of the Program, that part may be used separately
+under those permissions, but the entire Program remains governed by
+this License without regard to the additional permissions.
+
+  When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option
+remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of
+it.  (Additional permissions may be written to require their own
+removal in certain cases when you modify the work.)  You may place
+additional permissions on material, added by you to a covered work,
+for which you have or can give appropriate copyright permission.
+
+  Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you
+add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of
+that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:
+
+    a) Disclaiming warranty or limiting liability differently from the
+    terms of sections 15 and 16 of this License; or
+
+    b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or
+    author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal
+    Notices displayed by works containing it; or
+
+    c) Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or
+    requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in
+    reasonable ways as different from the original version; or
+
+    d) Limiting the use for publicity purposes of names of licensors or
+    authors of the material; or
+
+    e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
+    trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
+
+    f) Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that
+    material by anyone who conveys the material (or modified versions of
+    it) with contractual assumptions of liability to the recipient, for
+    any liability that these contractual assumptions directly impose on
+    those licensors and authors.
+
+  All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further
+restrictions" within the meaning of section 10.  If the Program as you
+received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is
+governed by this License along with a term that is a further
+restriction, you may remove that term.  If a license document contains
+a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this
+License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms
+of that license document, provided that the further restriction does
+not survive such relicensing or conveying.
+
+  If you add terms to a covered work in accord with this section, you
+must place, in the relevant source files, a statement of the
+additional terms that apply to those files, or a notice indicating
+where to find the applicable terms.
+
+  Additional terms, permissive or non-permissive, may be stated in the
+form of a separately written license, or stated as exceptions;
+the above requirements apply either way.
+
+  8. Termination.
+
+  You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly
+provided under this License.  Any attempt otherwise to propagate or
+modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under
+this License (including any patent licenses granted under the third
+paragraph of section 11).
+
+  However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
+license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
+provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and
+finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the copyright
+holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means
+prior to 60 days after the cessation.
+
+  Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
+reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
+violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
+received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that
+copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after
+your receipt of the notice.
+
+  Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate the
+licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you under
+this License.  If your rights have been terminated and not permanently
+reinstated, you do not qualify to receive new licenses for the same
+material under section 10.
+
+  9. Acceptance Not Required for Having Copies.
+
+  You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or
+run a copy of the Program.  Ancillary propagation of a covered work
+occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission
+to receive a copy likewise does not require acceptance.  However,
+nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or
+modify any covered work.  These actions infringe copyright if you do
+not accept this License.  Therefore, by modifying or propagating a
+covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so.
+
+  10. Automatic Licensing of Downstream Recipients.
+
+  Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically
+receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and
+propagate that work, subject to this License.  You are not responsible
+for enforcing compliance by third parties with this License.
+
+  An "entity transaction" is a transaction transferring control of an
+organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an
+organization, or merging organizations.  If propagation of a covered
+work results from an entity transaction, each party to that
+transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever
+licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or could
+give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the
+Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if
+the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts.
+
+  You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the
+rights granted or affirmed under this License.  For example, you may
+not impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of
+rights granted under this License, and you may not initiate litigation
+(including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that
+any patent claim is infringed by making, using, selling, offering for
+sale, or importing the Program or any portion of it.
+
+  11. Patents.
+
+  A "contributor" is a copyright holder who authorizes use under this
+License of the Program or a work on which the Program is based.  The
+work thus licensed is called the contributor's "contributor version".
+
+  A contributor's "essential patent claims" are all patent claims
+owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or
+hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner, permitted
+by this License, of making, using, or selling its contributor version,
+but do not include claims that would be infringed only as a
+consequence of further modification of the contributor version.  For
+purposes of this definition, "control" includes the right to grant
+patent sublicenses in a manner consistent with the requirements of
+this License.
+
+  Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free
+patent license under the contributor's essential patent claims, to
+make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and
+propagate the contents of its contributor version.
+
+  In the following three paragraphs, a "patent license" is any express
+agreement or commitment, however denominated, not to enforce a patent
+(such as an express permission to practice a patent or covenant not to
+sue for patent infringement).  To "grant" such a patent license to a
+party means to make such an agreement or commitment not to enforce a
+patent against the party.
+
+  If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license,
+and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone
+to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a
+publicly available network server or other readily accessible means,
+then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so
+available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the
+patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner
+consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent
+license to downstream recipients.  "Knowingly relying" means you have
+actual knowledge that, but for the patent license, your conveying the
+covered work in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work
+in a country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that
+country that you have reason to believe are valid.
+
+  If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or
+arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a
+covered work, and grant a patent license to some of the parties
+receiving the covered work authorizing them to use, propagate, modify
+or convey a specific copy of the covered work, then the patent license
+you grant is automatically extended to all recipients of the covered
+work and works based on it.
+
+  A patent license is "discriminatory" if it does not include within
+the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is
+conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are
+specifically granted under this License.  You may not convey a covered
+work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is
+in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment
+to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying
+the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the
+parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory
+patent license (a) in connection with copies of the covered work
+conveyed by you (or copies made from those copies), or (b) primarily
+for and in connection with specific products or compilations that
+contain the covered work, unless you entered into that arrangement,
+or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007.
+
+  Nothing in this License shall be construed as excluding or limiting
+any implied license or other defenses to infringement that may
+otherwise be available to you under applicable patent law.
+
+  12. No Surrender of Others' Freedom.
+
+  If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or
+otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not
+excuse you from the conditions of this License.  If you cannot convey a
+covered work so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this
+License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may
+not convey it at all.  For example, if you agree to terms that obligate you
+to collect a royalty for further conveying from those to whom you convey
+the Program, the only way you could satisfy both those terms and this
+License would be to refrain entirely from conveying the Program.
+
+  13. Use with the GNU Affero General Public License.
+
+  Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have
+permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed
+under version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License into a single
+combined work, and to convey the resulting work.  The terms of this
+License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work,
+but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License,
+section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the
+combination as such.
+
+  14. Revised Versions of this License.
+
+  The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of
+the GNU General Public License from time to time.  Such new versions will
+be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to
+address new problems or concerns.
+
+  Each version is given a distinguishing version number.  If the
+Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General
+Public License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the
+option of following the terms and conditions either of that numbered
+version or of any later version published by the Free Software
+Foundation.  If the Program does not specify a version number of the
+GNU General Public License, you may choose any version ever published
+by the Free Software Foundation.
+
+  If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future
+versions of the GNU General Public License can be used, that proxy's
+public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you
+to choose that version for the Program.
+
+  Later license versions may give you additional or different
+permissions.  However, no additional obligations are imposed on any
+author or copyright holder as a result of your choosing to follow a
+later version.
+
+  15. Disclaimer of Warranty.
+
+  THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY
+APPLICABLE LAW.  EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT
+HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY
+OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
+THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+PURPOSE.  THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM
+IS WITH YOU.  SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF
+ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
+
+  16. Limitation of Liability.
+
+  IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING
+WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES AND/OR CONVEYS
+THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY
+GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE
+USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF
+DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD
+PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS),
+EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
+SUCH DAMAGES.
+
+  17. Interpretation of Sections 15 and 16.
+
+  If the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability provided
+above cannot be given local legal effect according to their terms,
+reviewing courts shall apply local law that most closely approximates
+an absolute waiver of all civil liability in connection with the
+Program, unless a warranty or assumption of liability accompanies a
+copy of the Program in return for a fee.
+
+                     END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+            How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
+
+  If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
+possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
+free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.
+
+  To do so, attach the following notices to the program.  It is safest
+to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
+state the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
+the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
+
+    <one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.>
+    Copyright (C) <year>  <name of author>
+
+    This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+    the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+    (at your option) any later version.
+
+    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+    GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+    along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.
+
+  If the program does terminal interaction, make it output a short
+notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
+
+    <program>  Copyright (C) <year>  <name of author>
+    This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
+    This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
+    under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
+
+The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
+parts of the General Public License.  Of course, your program's commands
+might be different; for a GUI interface, you would use an "about box".
+
+  You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or school,
+if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary.
+For more information on this, and how to apply and follow the GNU GPL, see
+<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+  The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program
+into proprietary programs.  If your program is a subroutine library, you
+may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with
+the library.  If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General
+Public License instead of this License.  But first, please read
+<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html>.

README.md

@@ -56,3 +56,7 @@ See the [v2 migration guide](docs/migrations/v2.md) for old configurations.
 - [Subprocess integration](docs/integrations/subprocess.md)
 - [LLM endpoint contract](docs/integrations/openai-compatible-llm.md)
 - [Contributor guide](docs/development.md)
+
+Audita is licensed under the [GPL v3.0 or later](COPYRIGHT).
+
+[Open Source attribution notices](docs/oss/attribution.md) are available.

docs/development.md

@@ -7,9 +7,8 @@ Audita is a Go CLI for transcript polishing. Start with the
 ## Before Changing the Repository
 
 Coding agents must read and follow the [agent policy](policy/agents.md) before
-recommending, planning, or implementing changes. Read the
-[architecture policy](policy/architecture.md) for boundaries and invariants,
-then use the task guide below rather than reading every reference indiscriminately.
+recommending, planning, or implementing changes. Use the policy reading guide
+below to select the policies applicable to the task.
 
 Confirm the requested scope and behavior contract, make focused changes in the
 owning component, and update the relevant tests and canonical documentation
@@ -18,6 +17,28 @@ sufficiency; the [documentation policy](policy/documentation.md) governs content
 ownership. Commit discipline and agent Git restrictions are in the
 [agent policy](policy/agents.md#git-commit-policy).
 
+## Policy Reading Guide
+
+| Policy | Read before… |
+| --- | --- |
+| [Policy set provenance](policy/meta.md) | Adopting policies, checking upstream revisions, or updating the adopted policy set. |
+| [Agents](policy/agents.md) | Recommending, planning, or implementing repository changes. |
+| [Architecture](policy/architecture.md) | Planning or changing application code or its structure. |
+| [Testing](policy/testing.md) | Selecting validation for code changes, or adding, changing, removing, or evaluating tests. |
+| [Documentation](policy/documentation.md) | Writing, revising, or reorganizing documentation. |
+| [OSS](policy/oss.md) | Adding or updating dependencies or incorporated third-party material, or changing licensing or attribution. |
+| [Release](policy/release.md) | Preparing or publishing a release, changing release procedures, or making versioning and compatibility decisions. |
+
+- Read applicable policies before making decisions they govern; multiple policies
+  may apply.
+- Select policies using the task triggers above. Follow cross-references to
+  relevant sections when needed to resolve a concrete question.
+- Reuse policies already available in context; reread when changed or no longer
+  available.
+- Expand reading when the task's scope expands.
+- When revising a policy itself, read that policy and any provisions elsewhere
+  affected by the revision.
+
 ## Baseline Validation
 
 Use Go 1.25.5 or newer. From the repository root:

docs/integrations/openai-compatible-llm.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ failures; explicit zero makes one attempt. `llm.repair_attempts` counts
 additional generations for schema-invalid model output. The operation timeout
 covers preparation, capacity waiting, retries, generation, and repair. Caller
 cancellation or an earlier deadline also applies. See [configuration](../config.md#settings)
-for defaults and [PromptKit's consumer contract](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit/src/tag/v0.11.0/docs/consumers/pkg-promptkit.md)
+for defaults and [PromptKit's consumer contract](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit/src/tag/v0.11.2/docs/consumers/pkg-promptkit.md)
 for the pinned protocol and retry details.
 
 A model operation that exhausts structural repair, a live-parent local operation

docs/oss/attribution.md

@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+# Open Source Attribution Notices
+
+## Standard Repository Policies
+
+Material: All documents under `docs/policy/`, root `AGENTS.md`, and the Policy Reading Guide in `docs/development.md`, adapted for this repository.
+
+Copyright (C) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
+
+License and notices: [CC BY-SA 4.0](licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt) |
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/COPYRIGHT) |
+[LICENSE](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/LICENSE).
+
+[Source](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843).
+
+## ConfigKit
+
+Selected module: `gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit` at `v0.4.2`.
+
+Copyright (C) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-3.0-or-later
+
+License and notices: [LGPL v3](licenses/LGPL-3.0.txt) |
+[GPL v3](licenses/GPL-3.0.txt) |
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit/src/commit/67c03690181c5af8dde6be325abac241dae6732f/COPYRIGHT).
+
+[Source](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit/src/commit/67c03690181c5af8dde6be325abac241dae6732f).
+
+## Go runtime and standard library
+
+Selected toolchain: Go 1.25.5 for the distributed Linux binaries.
+
+Copyright 2009 The Go Authors.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+
+License and notices: [BSD 3-Clause](licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Go.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/LICENSE) |
+[PATENTS](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/PATENTS).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9).
+
+## Go vendored golang.org/x/crypto
+
+Material: `golang.org/x/crypto` at `v0.39.0` in the Go 1.25.5 standard library.
+
+Copyright 2009 The Go Authors.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+
+License and notices: [BSD 3-Clause](licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Go.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/LICENSE) |
+[PATENTS](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/PATENTS).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9).
+
+## Go vendored golang.org/x/net
+
+Material: `golang.org/x/net` at `v0.41.0` in the Go 1.25.5 standard library.
+
+Copyright 2009 The Go Authors.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+
+License and notices: [BSD 3-Clause](licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Go.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/net/LICENSE) |
+[PATENTS](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/net/PATENTS).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9).
+
+## Go vendored golang.org/x/sys
+
+Material: `golang.org/x/sys` at `v0.33.0` in the Go 1.25.5 standard library.
+
+Copyright 2009 The Go Authors.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+
+License and notices: [BSD 3-Clause](licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Go.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/sys/LICENSE) |
+[PATENTS](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/sys/PATENTS).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9).
+
+## Go vendored golang.org/x/text
+
+Material: `golang.org/x/text` at `v0.26.0` in the Go 1.25.5 standard library.
+
+Copyright 2009 The Go Authors.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+
+License and notices: [BSD 3-Clause](licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Go.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/text/LICENSE) |
+[PATENTS](https://github.com/golang/go/blob/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9/src/vendor/golang.org/x/text/PATENTS).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/fefb02adf45c4bcc879bd406a8d61f2a292c26a9).
+
+## go-yaml v4
+
+Selected module: `go.yaml.in/yaml/v4` at `v4.0.0-rc.6`.
+
+Copyright 2006-2010 Kirill Simonov
+
+Copyright 2011-2019 Canonical Ltd
+
+Copyright 2025 The go-yaml Project Contributors
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 AND MIT
+
+License and notices: [Apache 2.0](licenses/Apache-2.0.txt) |
+[MIT](licenses/MIT-libyaml-v4.txt) |
+[NOTICE](https://github.com/yaml/go-yaml/blob/1c17b9cee72bf81ae73a8be50fbd7dd3a9985125/NOTICE).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/yaml/go-yaml/commit/1c17b9cee72bf81ae73a8be50fbd7dd3a9985125).
+
+## golang.org/x/text
+
+Selected module: `golang.org/x/text` at `v0.14.0`.
+
+Copyright (c) 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+
+License and notices: [BSD 3-Clause](licenses/BSD-3-Clause-x-text.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/golang/text/blob/6c97a165dd661335ff7bce6104a008558123c353/LICENSE) |
+[PATENTS](https://github.com/golang/text/blob/6c97a165dd661335ff7bce6104a008558123c353/PATENTS).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/golang/text/commit/6c97a165dd661335ff7bce6104a008558123c353).
+
+## jsonschema/v6
+
+Selected module: `github.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6` at `v6.0.2`.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
+
+License and notices: [Apache 2.0](licenses/Apache-2.0.txt).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/commit/29cbed948d24a04700eb94436416b18a07953b71).
+
+## PromptKit
+
+Selected module: `gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit` at `v0.11.2`.
+
+Copyright (C) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-3.0-or-later
+
+License and notices: [LGPL v3](licenses/LGPL-3.0.txt) |
+[GPL v3](licenses/GPL-3.0.txt) |
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit/src/commit/12d6d80024e80c552d122a076c22429bf6f2f6c2/COPYRIGHT).
+
+[Source](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit/src/commit/12d6d80024e80c552d122a076c22429bf6f2f6c2).
+
+## Promptkit OpenRouter Catalog
+
+Selected module: `gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2` at `v2.20260926.0`.
+
+Copyright (C) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+
+License and notices: [MIT](licenses/MIT-Catalogs.txt) |
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/src/commit/4f731d217e0bc39151c010f50fb5912706e7b6b3/COPYRIGHT) |
+[LICENSE](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/src/commit/4f731d217e0bc39151c010f50fb5912706e7b6b3/LICENSE).
+
+[Source](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/src/commit/4f731d217e0bc39151c010f50fb5912706e7b6b3).
+
+## Promptkit Rakestrawhome Catalog
+
+Selected module: `gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2` at `v2.20260926.0`.
+
+Copyright (C) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+
+License and notices: [MIT](licenses/MIT-Catalogs.txt) |
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/src/commit/48918a3ad39fd99843cda94a86133b1b3881d596/COPYRIGHT) |
+[LICENSE](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/src/commit/48918a3ad39fd99843cda94a86133b1b3881d596/LICENSE).
+
+[Source](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/src/commit/48918a3ad39fd99843cda94a86133b1b3881d596).
+
+## yaml.v3
+
+Selected module: `gopkg.in/yaml.v3` at `v3.0.1`.
+
+Copyright (c) 2006-2010 Kirill Simonov
+
+Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Kirill Simonov
+
+Copyright (c) 2011-2019 Canonical Ltd
+
+Copyright 2011-2016 Canonical Ltd.
+
+SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 AND MIT
+
+License and notices: [Apache 2.0](licenses/Apache-2.0.txt) |
+[MIT](licenses/MIT-libyaml.txt) |
+[LICENSE](https://github.com/go-yaml/yaml/blob/f6f7691b1fdeb513f56608cd2c32c51f8194bf51/LICENSE) |
+[NOTICE](https://github.com/go-yaml/yaml/blob/f6f7691b1fdeb513f56608cd2c32c51f8194bf51/NOTICE).
+
+[Source](https://github.com/go-yaml/yaml/commit/f6f7691b1fdeb513f56608cd2c32c51f8194bf51).

docs/oss/licenses/Apache-2.0.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+
+                                 Apache License
+                           Version 2.0, January 2004
+                        http://www.apache.org/licenses/
+
+   TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
+
+   1. Definitions.
+
+      "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
+      and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
+
+      "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
+      the copyright owner that is granting the License.
+
+      "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
+      other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
+      control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
+      "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
+      direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
+      otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
+      outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
+
+      "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
+      exercising permissions granted by this License.
+
+      "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
+      including but not limited to software source code, documentation
+      source, and configuration files.
+
+      "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
+      transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
+      not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
+      and conversions to other media types.
+
+      "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
+      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
+      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
+      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).
+
+      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
+      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
+      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
+      represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
+      of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
+      separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
+      the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
+
+      "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
+      the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
+      to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
+      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
+      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
+      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
+      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
+      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
+      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
+      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
+      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
+      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
+      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
+
+      "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
+      on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
+      subsequently incorporated within the Work.
+
+   2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
+      publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
+      Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
+
+   3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
+      this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
+      worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
+      (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
+      use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
+      where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
+      by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
+      Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
+      with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
+      institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
+      cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
+      or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
+      or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
+      granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
+      as of the date such litigation is filed.
+
+   4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
+      Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
+      modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
+      meet the following conditions:
+
+      (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
+          Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
+
+      (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
+          stating that You changed the files; and
+
+      (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
+          that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
+          attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
+          excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
+          the Derivative Works; and
+
+      (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
+          distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
+          include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
+          within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
+          pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
+          of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
+          as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
+          documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
+          within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
+          wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
+          of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
+          do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
+          notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
+          or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
+          that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
+          as modifying the License.
+
+      You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
+      may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
+      for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
+      for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
+      reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
+      the conditions stated in this License.
+
+   5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
+      any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
+      by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
+      this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
+      Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
+      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
+      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
+
+   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
+      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
+      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
+      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
+
+   7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
+      agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
+      Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+      WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
+      implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
+      of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
+      PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
+      appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
+      risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
+
+   8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
+      whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
+      unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
+      negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
+      liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
+      incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
+      result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
+      Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
+      work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
+      other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
+      has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
+
+   9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
+      the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
+      and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
+      or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
+      License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
+      on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
+      of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
+      defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
+      incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
+      of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
+
+   END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
+
+      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
+      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
+      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
+      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
+      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
+      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
+      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
+      identification within third-party archives.
+
+   Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
+
+   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+   You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   limitations under the License.

docs/oss/licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Go.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Copyright 2009 The Go Authors.
+
+Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+met:
+
+   * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+   * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+distribution.
+   * Neither the name of Google LLC nor the names of its
+contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+this software without specific prior written permission.
+
+THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+"AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

docs/oss/licenses/BSD-3-Clause-x-text.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Copyright (c) 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+
+Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+met:
+
+   * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+   * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+distribution.
+   * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+this software without specific prior written permission.
+
+THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+"AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

docs/oss/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
+
+ Creative Commons Corporation (“Creative Commons”) is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an “as-is” basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.
+
+Using Creative Commons Public Licenses
+
+Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.
+
+Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC-licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors.
+
+Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor’s permission is not necessary for any reason–for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright–then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described.
+
+Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public.
+
+Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License
+
+By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.
+
+Section 1 – Definitions.
+
+     a.	Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.
+
+     b.	Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.
+
+     c.	BY-SA Compatible License means a license listed at creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses, approved by Creative Commons as essentially the equivalent of this Public License.
+
+     d.	Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.
+
+     e.	Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.
+
+     f.	Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.
+
+     g.	License Elements means the license attributes listed in the name of a Creative Commons Public License. The License Elements of this Public License are Attribution and ShareAlike.
+
+     h.	Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.
+
+     i.	Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.
+
+     j.	Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.
+
+     k.	Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.
+
+     l.	Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.
+
+     m.	You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.
+
+Section 2 – Scope.
+
+     a.	License grant.
+
+          1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:
+
+               A. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part; and
+
+               B. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material.
+
+          2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.
+
+          3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).
+
+          4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a)(4) never produces Adapted Material.
+
+          5. Downstream recipients.
+
+               A. Offer from the Licensor – Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.
+
+               B. Additional offer from the Licensor – Adapted Material. Every recipient of Adapted Material from You automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Adapted Material under the conditions of the Adapter’s License You apply.
+
+               C. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.
+
+          6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).
+
+     b.	Other rights.
+
+          1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.
+
+          2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.
+
+          3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties.
+
+Section 3 – License Conditions.
+
+Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.
+
+     a.	Attribution.
+
+          1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:
+
+               A. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:
+
+                    i.	identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);
+
+                    ii.	a copyright notice;
+
+                    iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;
+
+                    iv.	a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;
+
+                    v.	a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;
+
+               B. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and
+
+               C. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.
+
+          2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.
+
+          3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.
+
+     b.	ShareAlike.In addition to the conditions in Section 3(a), if You Share Adapted Material You produce, the following conditions also apply.
+
+          1. The Adapter’s License You apply must be a Creative Commons license with the same License Elements, this version or later, or a BY-SA Compatible License.
+
+          2. You must include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, the Adapter's License You apply. You may satisfy this condition in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share Adapted Material.
+
+          3. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, Adapted Material that restrict exercise of the rights granted under the Adapter's License You apply.
+
+Section 4 – Sui Generis Database Rights.
+
+Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:
+
+     a.	for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database;
+
+     b.	if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material, including for purposes of Section 3(b); and
+
+     c.	You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.
+For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.
+
+Section 5 – Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.
+
+     a.	Unless otherwise separately undertaken by the Licensor, to the extent possible, the Licensor offers the Licensed Material as-is and as-available, and makes no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the Licensed Material, whether express, implied, statutory, or other. This includes, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, absence of latent or other defects, accuracy, or the presence or absence of errors, whether or not known or discoverable. Where disclaimers of warranties are not allowed in full or in part, this disclaimer may not apply to You.
+
+     b.	To the extent possible, in no event will the Licensor be liable to You on any legal theory (including, without limitation, negligence) or otherwise for any direct, special, indirect, incidental, consequential, punitive, exemplary, or other losses, costs, expenses, or damages arising out of this Public License or use of the Licensed Material, even if the Licensor has been advised of the possibility of such losses, costs, expenses, or damages. Where a limitation of liability is not allowed in full or in part, this limitation may not apply to You.
+
+     c.	The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.
+
+Section 6 – Term and Termination.
+
+     a.	This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.
+
+     b.	Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:
+
+          1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or
+
+          2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.
+
+     c.	For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.
+
+     d.	For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.
+
+     e.	Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.
+
+Section 7 – Other Terms and Conditions.
+
+     a.	The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.
+
+     b.	Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.
+
+Section 8 – Interpretation.
+
+     a.	For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.
+
+     b.	To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.
+
+     c.	No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.
+
+     d.	Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.
+
+Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark “Creative Commons” or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.
+
+Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.

docs/oss/licenses/GPL-3.0.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,674 @@
+                    GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+                       Version 3, 29 June 2007
+
+ Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <https://fsf.org/>
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
+ of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
+
+                            Preamble
+
+  The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
+software and other kinds of works.
+
+  The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
+to take away your freedom to share and change the works.  By contrast,
+the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
+share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free
+software for all its users.  We, the Free Software Foundation, use the
+GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to
+any other work released this way by its authors.  You can apply it to
+your programs, too.
+
+  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
+price.  Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
+have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
+them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
+want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
+free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
+
+  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
+these rights or asking you to surrender the rights.  Therefore, you have
+certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
+you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
+
+  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
+gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
+freedoms that you received.  You must make sure that they, too, receive
+or can get the source code.  And you must show them these terms so they
+know their rights.
+
+  Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
+(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
+giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
+
+  For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
+that there is no warranty for this free software.  For both users' and
+authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
+changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
+authors of previous versions.
+
+  Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
+modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer
+can do so.  This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
+protecting users' freedom to change the software.  The systematic
+pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
+use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable.  Therefore, we
+have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
+products.  If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
+stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
+of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
+
+  Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
+States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
+software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to
+avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could
+make it effectively proprietary.  To prevent this, the GPL assures that
+patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
+
+  The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
+modification follow.
+
+                       TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+  0. Definitions.
+
+  "This License" refers to version 3 of the GNU General Public License.
+
+  "Copyright" also means copyright-like laws that apply to other kinds of
+works, such as semiconductor masks.
+
+  "The Program" refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this
+License.  Each licensee is addressed as "you".  "Licensees" and
+"recipients" may be individuals or organizations.
+
+  To "modify" a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work
+in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an
+exact copy.  The resulting work is called a "modified version" of the
+earlier work or a work "based on" the earlier work.
+
+  A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work based
+on the Program.
+
+  To "propagate" a work means to do anything with it that, without
+permission, would make you directly or secondarily liable for
+infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a
+computer or modifying a private copy.  Propagation includes copying,
+distribution (with or without modification), making available to the
+public, and in some countries other activities as well.
+
+  To "convey" a work means any kind of propagation that enables other
+parties to make or receive copies.  Mere interaction with a user through
+a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying.
+
+  An interactive user interface displays "Appropriate Legal Notices"
+to the extent that it includes a convenient and prominently visible
+feature that (1) displays an appropriate copyright notice, and (2)
+tells the user that there is no warranty for the work (except to the
+extent that warranties are provided), that licensees may convey the
+work under this License, and how to view a copy of this License.  If
+the interface presents a list of user commands or options, such as a
+menu, a prominent item in the list meets this criterion.
+
+  1. Source Code.
+
+  The "source code" for a work means the preferred form of the work
+for making modifications to it.  "Object code" means any non-source
+form of a work.
+
+  A "Standard Interface" means an interface that either is an official
+standard defined by a recognized standards body, or, in the case of
+interfaces specified for a particular programming language, one that
+is widely used among developers working in that language.
+
+  The "System Libraries" of an executable work include anything, other
+than the work as a whole, that (a) is included in the normal form of
+packaging a Major Component, but which is not part of that Major
+Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work with that
+Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an
+implementation is available to the public in source code form.  A
+"Major Component", in this context, means a major essential component
+(kernel, window system, and so on) of the specific operating system
+(if any) on which the executable work runs, or a compiler used to
+produce the work, or an object code interpreter used to run it.
+
+  The "Corresponding Source" for a work in object code form means all
+the source code needed to generate, install, and (for an executable
+work) run the object code and to modify the work, including scripts to
+control those activities.  However, it does not include the work's
+System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free
+programs which are used unmodified in performing those activities but
+which are not part of the work.  For example, Corresponding Source
+includes interface definition files associated with source files for
+the work, and the source code for shared libraries and dynamically
+linked subprograms that the work is specifically designed to require,
+such as by intimate data communication or control flow between those
+subprograms and other parts of the work.
+
+  The Corresponding Source need not include anything that users
+can regenerate automatically from other parts of the Corresponding
+Source.
+
+  The Corresponding Source for a work in source code form is that
+same work.
+
+  2. Basic Permissions.
+
+  All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of
+copyright on the Program, and are irrevocable provided the stated
+conditions are met.  This License explicitly affirms your unlimited
+permission to run the unmodified Program.  The output from running a
+covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its
+content, constitutes a covered work.  This License acknowledges your
+rights of fair use or other equivalent, as provided by copyright law.
+
+  You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not
+convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains
+in force.  You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose
+of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you
+with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with
+the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do
+not control copyright.  Those thus making or running the covered works
+for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction
+and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of
+your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you.
+
+  Conveying under any other circumstances is permitted solely under
+the conditions stated below.  Sublicensing is not allowed; section 10
+makes it unnecessary.
+
+  3. Protecting Users' Legal Rights From Anti-Circumvention Law.
+
+  No covered work shall be deemed part of an effective technological
+measure under any applicable law fulfilling obligations under article
+11 of the WIPO copyright treaty adopted on 20 December 1996, or
+similar laws prohibiting or restricting circumvention of such
+measures.
+
+  When you convey a covered work, you waive any legal power to forbid
+circumvention of technological measures to the extent such circumvention
+is effected by exercising rights under this License with respect to
+the covered work, and you disclaim any intention to limit operation or
+modification of the work as a means of enforcing, against the work's
+users, your or third parties' legal rights to forbid circumvention of
+technological measures.
+
+  4. Conveying Verbatim Copies.
+
+  You may convey verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you
+receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and
+appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice;
+keep intact all notices stating that this License and any
+non-permissive terms added in accord with section 7 apply to the code;
+keep intact all notices of the absence of any warranty; and give all
+recipients a copy of this License along with the Program.
+
+  You may charge any price or no price for each copy that you convey,
+and you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee.
+
+  5. Conveying Modified Source Versions.
+
+  You may convey a work based on the Program, or the modifications to
+produce it from the Program, in the form of source code under the
+terms of section 4, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
+
+    a) The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified
+    it, and giving a relevant date.
+
+    b) The work must carry prominent notices stating that it is
+    released under this License and any conditions added under section
+    7.  This requirement modifies the requirement in section 4 to
+    "keep intact all notices".
+
+    c) You must license the entire work, as a whole, under this
+    License to anyone who comes into possession of a copy.  This
+    License will therefore apply, along with any applicable section 7
+    additional terms, to the whole of the work, and all its parts,
+    regardless of how they are packaged.  This License gives no
+    permission to license the work in any other way, but it does not
+    invalidate such permission if you have separately received it.
+
+    d) If the work has interactive user interfaces, each must display
+    Appropriate Legal Notices; however, if the Program has interactive
+    interfaces that do not display Appropriate Legal Notices, your
+    work need not make them do so.
+
+  A compilation of a covered work with other separate and independent
+works, which are not by their nature extensions of the covered work,
+and which are not combined with it such as to form a larger program,
+in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an
+"aggregate" if the compilation and its resulting copyright are not
+used to limit the access or legal rights of the compilation's users
+beyond what the individual works permit.  Inclusion of a covered work
+in an aggregate does not cause this License to apply to the other
+parts of the aggregate.
+
+  6. Conveying Non-Source Forms.
+
+  You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms
+of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the
+machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License,
+in one of these ways:
+
+    a) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
+    (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by the
+    Corresponding Source fixed on a durable physical medium
+    customarily used for software interchange.
+
+    b) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product
+    (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a
+    written offer, valid for at least three years and valid for as
+    long as you offer spare parts or customer support for that product
+    model, to give anyone who possesses the object code either (1) a
+    copy of the Corresponding Source for all the software in the
+    product that is covered by this License, on a durable physical
+    medium customarily used for software interchange, for a price no
+    more than your reasonable cost of physically performing this
+    conveying of source, or (2) access to copy the
+    Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge.
+
+    c) Convey individual copies of the object code with a copy of the
+    written offer to provide the Corresponding Source.  This
+    alternative is allowed only occasionally and noncommercially, and
+    only if you received the object code with such an offer, in accord
+    with subsection 6b.
+
+    d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated
+    place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the
+    Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no
+    further charge.  You need not require recipients to copy the
+    Corresponding Source along with the object code.  If the place to
+    copy the object code is a network server, the Corresponding Source
+    may be on a different server (operated by you or a third party)
+    that supports equivalent copying facilities, provided you maintain
+    clear directions next to the object code saying where to find the
+    Corresponding Source.  Regardless of what server hosts the
+    Corresponding Source, you remain obligated to ensure that it is
+    available for as long as needed to satisfy these requirements.
+
+    e) Convey the object code using peer-to-peer transmission, provided
+    you inform other peers where the object code and Corresponding
+    Source of the work are being offered to the general public at no
+    charge under subsection 6d.
+
+  A separable portion of the object code, whose source code is excluded
+from the Corresponding Source as a System Library, need not be
+included in conveying the object code work.
+
+  A "User Product" is either (1) a "consumer product", which means any
+tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, family,
+or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for incorporation
+into a dwelling.  In determining whether a product is a consumer product,
+doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of coverage.  For a particular
+product received by a particular user, "normally used" refers to a
+typical or common use of that class of product, regardless of the status
+of the particular user or of the way in which the particular user
+actually uses, or expects or is expected to use, the product.  A product
+is a consumer product regardless of whether the product has substantial
+commercial, industrial or non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent
+the only significant mode of use of the product.
+
+  "Installation Information" for a User Product means any methods,
+procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install
+and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from
+a modified version of its Corresponding Source.  The information must
+suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object
+code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because
+modification has been made.
+
+  If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or
+specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as
+part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the
+User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a
+fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), the
+Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be accompanied
+by the Installation Information.  But this requirement does not apply
+if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install
+modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has
+been installed in ROM).
+
+  The requirement to provide Installation Information does not include a
+requirement to continue to provide support service, warranty, or updates
+for a work that has been modified or installed by the recipient, or for
+the User Product in which it has been modified or installed.  Access to a
+network may be denied when the modification itself materially and
+adversely affects the operation of the network or violates the rules and
+protocols for communication across the network.
+
+  Corresponding Source conveyed, and Installation Information provided,
+in accord with this section must be in a format that is publicly
+documented (and with an implementation available to the public in
+source code form), and must require no special password or key for
+unpacking, reading or copying.
+
+  7. Additional Terms.
+
+  "Additional permissions" are terms that supplement the terms of this
+License by making exceptions from one or more of its conditions.
+Additional permissions that are applicable to the entire Program shall
+be treated as though they were included in this License, to the extent
+that they are valid under applicable law.  If additional permissions
+apply only to part of the Program, that part may be used separately
+under those permissions, but the entire Program remains governed by
+this License without regard to the additional permissions.
+
+  When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option
+remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of
+it.  (Additional permissions may be written to require their own
+removal in certain cases when you modify the work.)  You may place
+additional permissions on material, added by you to a covered work,
+for which you have or can give appropriate copyright permission.
+
+  Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, for material you
+add to a covered work, you may (if authorized by the copyright holders of
+that material) supplement the terms of this License with terms:
+
+    a) Disclaiming warranty or limiting liability differently from the
+    terms of sections 15 and 16 of this License; or
+
+    b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or
+    author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal
+    Notices displayed by works containing it; or
+
+    c) Prohibiting misrepresentation of the origin of that material, or
+    requiring that modified versions of such material be marked in
+    reasonable ways as different from the original version; or
+
+    d) Limiting the use for publicity purposes of names of licensors or
+    authors of the material; or
+
+    e) Declining to grant rights under trademark law for use of some
+    trade names, trademarks, or service marks; or
+
+    f) Requiring indemnification of licensors and authors of that
+    material by anyone who conveys the material (or modified versions of
+    it) with contractual assumptions of liability to the recipient, for
+    any liability that these contractual assumptions directly impose on
+    those licensors and authors.
+
+  All other non-permissive additional terms are considered "further
+restrictions" within the meaning of section 10.  If the Program as you
+received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is
+governed by this License along with a term that is a further
+restriction, you may remove that term.  If a license document contains
+a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this
+License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms
+of that license document, provided that the further restriction does
+not survive such relicensing or conveying.
+
+  If you add terms to a covered work in accord with this section, you
+must place, in the relevant source files, a statement of the
+additional terms that apply to those files, or a notice indicating
+where to find the applicable terms.
+
+  Additional terms, permissive or non-permissive, may be stated in the
+form of a separately written license, or stated as exceptions;
+the above requirements apply either way.
+
+  8. Termination.
+
+  You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly
+provided under this License.  Any attempt otherwise to propagate or
+modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under
+this License (including any patent licenses granted under the third
+paragraph of section 11).
+
+  However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your
+license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a)
+provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and
+finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the copyright
+holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means
+prior to 60 days after the cessation.
+
+  Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is
+reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the
+violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have
+received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that
+copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after
+your receipt of the notice.
+
+  Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate the
+licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you under
+this License.  If your rights have been terminated and not permanently
+reinstated, you do not qualify to receive new licenses for the same
+material under section 10.
+
+  9. Acceptance Not Required for Having Copies.
+
+  You are not required to accept this License in order to receive or
+run a copy of the Program.  Ancillary propagation of a covered work
+occurring solely as a consequence of using peer-to-peer transmission
+to receive a copy likewise does not require acceptance.  However,
+nothing other than this License grants you permission to propagate or
+modify any covered work.  These actions infringe copyright if you do
+not accept this License.  Therefore, by modifying or propagating a
+covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to do so.
+
+  10. Automatic Licensing of Downstream Recipients.
+
+  Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically
+receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and
+propagate that work, subject to this License.  You are not responsible
+for enforcing compliance by third parties with this License.
+
+  An "entity transaction" is a transaction transferring control of an
+organization, or substantially all assets of one, or subdividing an
+organization, or merging organizations.  If propagation of a covered
+work results from an entity transaction, each party to that
+transaction who receives a copy of the work also receives whatever
+licenses to the work the party's predecessor in interest had or could
+give under the previous paragraph, plus a right to possession of the
+Corresponding Source of the work from the predecessor in interest, if
+the predecessor has it or can get it with reasonable efforts.
+
+  You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the
+rights granted or affirmed under this License.  For example, you may
+not impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of
+rights granted under this License, and you may not initiate litigation
+(including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that
+any patent claim is infringed by making, using, selling, offering for
+sale, or importing the Program or any portion of it.
+
+  11. Patents.
+
+  A "contributor" is a copyright holder who authorizes use under this
+License of the Program or a work on which the Program is based.  The
+work thus licensed is called the contributor's "contributor version".
+
+  A contributor's "essential patent claims" are all patent claims
+owned or controlled by the contributor, whether already acquired or
+hereafter acquired, that would be infringed by some manner, permitted
+by this License, of making, using, or selling its contributor version,
+but do not include claims that would be infringed only as a
+consequence of further modification of the contributor version.  For
+purposes of this definition, "control" includes the right to grant
+patent sublicenses in a manner consistent with the requirements of
+this License.
+
+  Each contributor grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free
+patent license under the contributor's essential patent claims, to
+make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and otherwise run, modify and
+propagate the contents of its contributor version.
+
+  In the following three paragraphs, a "patent license" is any express
+agreement or commitment, however denominated, not to enforce a patent
+(such as an express permission to practice a patent or covenant not to
+sue for patent infringement).  To "grant" such a patent license to a
+party means to make such an agreement or commitment not to enforce a
+patent against the party.
+
+  If you convey a covered work, knowingly relying on a patent license,
+and the Corresponding Source of the work is not available for anyone
+to copy, free of charge and under the terms of this License, through a
+publicly available network server or other readily accessible means,
+then you must either (1) cause the Corresponding Source to be so
+available, or (2) arrange to deprive yourself of the benefit of the
+patent license for this particular work, or (3) arrange, in a manner
+consistent with the requirements of this License, to extend the patent
+license to downstream recipients.  "Knowingly relying" means you have
+actual knowledge that, but for the patent license, your conveying the
+covered work in a country, or your recipient's use of the covered work
+in a country, would infringe one or more identifiable patents in that
+country that you have reason to believe are valid.
+
+  If, pursuant to or in connection with a single transaction or
+arrangement, you convey, or propagate by procuring conveyance of, a
+covered work, and grant a patent license to some of the parties
+receiving the covered work authorizing them to use, propagate, modify
+or convey a specific copy of the covered work, then the patent license
+you grant is automatically extended to all recipients of the covered
+work and works based on it.
+
+  A patent license is "discriminatory" if it does not include within
+the scope of its coverage, prohibits the exercise of, or is
+conditioned on the non-exercise of one or more of the rights that are
+specifically granted under this License.  You may not convey a covered
+work if you are a party to an arrangement with a third party that is
+in the business of distributing software, under which you make payment
+to the third party based on the extent of your activity of conveying
+the work, and under which the third party grants, to any of the
+parties who would receive the covered work from you, a discriminatory
+patent license (a) in connection with copies of the covered work
+conveyed by you (or copies made from those copies), or (b) primarily
+for and in connection with specific products or compilations that
+contain the covered work, unless you entered into that arrangement,
+or that patent license was granted, prior to 28 March 2007.
+
+  Nothing in this License shall be construed as excluding or limiting
+any implied license or other defenses to infringement that may
+otherwise be available to you under applicable patent law.
+
+  12. No Surrender of Others' Freedom.
+
+  If conditions are imposed on you (whether by court order, agreement or
+otherwise) that contradict the conditions of this License, they do not
+excuse you from the conditions of this License.  If you cannot convey a
+covered work so as to satisfy simultaneously your obligations under this
+License and any other pertinent obligations, then as a consequence you may
+not convey it at all.  For example, if you agree to terms that obligate you
+to collect a royalty for further conveying from those to whom you convey
+the Program, the only way you could satisfy both those terms and this
+License would be to refrain entirely from conveying the Program.
+
+  13. Use with the GNU Affero General Public License.
+
+  Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have
+permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed
+under version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License into a single
+combined work, and to convey the resulting work.  The terms of this
+License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work,
+but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License,
+section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the
+combination as such.
+
+  14. Revised Versions of this License.
+
+  The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of
+the GNU General Public License from time to time.  Such new versions will
+be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to
+address new problems or concerns.
+
+  Each version is given a distinguishing version number.  If the
+Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General
+Public License "or any later version" applies to it, you have the
+option of following the terms and conditions either of that numbered
+version or of any later version published by the Free Software
+Foundation.  If the Program does not specify a version number of the
+GNU General Public License, you may choose any version ever published
+by the Free Software Foundation.
+
+  If the Program specifies that a proxy can decide which future
+versions of the GNU General Public License can be used, that proxy's
+public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you
+to choose that version for the Program.
+
+  Later license versions may give you additional or different
+permissions.  However, no additional obligations are imposed on any
+author or copyright holder as a result of your choosing to follow a
+later version.
+
+  15. Disclaimer of Warranty.
+
+  THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY
+APPLICABLE LAW.  EXCEPT WHEN OTHERWISE STATED IN WRITING THE COPYRIGHT
+HOLDERS AND/OR OTHER PARTIES PROVIDE THE PROGRAM "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY
+OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
+THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
+PURPOSE.  THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PROGRAM
+IS WITH YOU.  SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF
+ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
+
+  16. Limitation of Liability.
+
+  IN NO EVENT UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING
+WILL ANY COPYRIGHT HOLDER, OR ANY OTHER PARTY WHO MODIFIES AND/OR CONVEYS
+THE PROGRAM AS PERMITTED ABOVE, BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR DAMAGES, INCLUDING ANY
+GENERAL, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE
+USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF
+DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD
+PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS),
+EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
+SUCH DAMAGES.
+
+  17. Interpretation of Sections 15 and 16.
+
+  If the disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability provided
+above cannot be given local legal effect according to their terms,
+reviewing courts shall apply local law that most closely approximates
+an absolute waiver of all civil liability in connection with the
+Program, unless a warranty or assumption of liability accompanies a
+copy of the Program in return for a fee.
+
+                     END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
+
+            How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs
+
+  If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest
+possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it
+free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.
+
+  To do so, attach the following notices to the program.  It is safest
+to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively
+state the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least
+the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
+
+    <one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.>
+    Copyright (C) <year>  <name of author>
+
+    This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+    the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+    (at your option) any later version.
+
+    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+    GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+    along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.
+
+  If the program does terminal interaction, make it output a short
+notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
+
+    <program>  Copyright (C) <year>  <name of author>
+    This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
+    This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
+    under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
+
+The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
+parts of the General Public License.  Of course, your program's commands
+might be different; for a GUI interface, you would use an "about box".
+
+  You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or school,
+if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary.
+For more information on this, and how to apply and follow the GNU GPL, see
+<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+  The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program
+into proprietary programs.  If your program is a subroutine library, you
+may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with
+the library.  If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General
+Public License instead of this License.  But first, please read
+<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html>.

docs/oss/licenses/LGPL-3.0.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+                   GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+                       Version 3, 29 June 2007
+
+ Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <https://fsf.org/>
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
+ of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
+
+
+  This version of the GNU Lesser General Public License incorporates
+the terms and conditions of version 3 of the GNU General Public
+License, supplemented by the additional permissions listed below.
+
+  0. Additional Definitions.
+
+  As used herein, "this License" refers to version 3 of the GNU Lesser
+General Public License, and the "GNU GPL" refers to version 3 of the GNU
+General Public License.
+
+  "The Library" refers to a covered work governed by this License,
+other than an Application or a Combined Work as defined below.
+
+  An "Application" is any work that makes use of an interface provided
+by the Library, but which is not otherwise based on the Library.
+Defining a subclass of a class defined by the Library is deemed a mode
+of using an interface provided by the Library.
+
+  A "Combined Work" is a work produced by combining or linking an
+Application with the Library.  The particular version of the Library
+with which the Combined Work was made is also called the "Linked
+Version".
+
+  The "Minimal Corresponding Source" for a Combined Work means the
+Corresponding Source for the Combined Work, excluding any source code
+for portions of the Combined Work that, considered in isolation, are
+based on the Application, and not on the Linked Version.
+
+  The "Corresponding Application Code" for a Combined Work means the
+object code and/or source code for the Application, including any data
+and utility programs needed for reproducing the Combined Work from the
+Application, but excluding the System Libraries of the Combined Work.
+
+  1. Exception to Section 3 of the GNU GPL.
+
+  You may convey a covered work under sections 3 and 4 of this License
+without being bound by section 3 of the GNU GPL.
+
+  2. Conveying Modified Versions.
+
+  If you modify a copy of the Library, and, in your modifications, a
+facility refers to a function or data to be supplied by an Application
+that uses the facility (other than as an argument passed when the
+facility is invoked), then you may convey a copy of the modified
+version:
+
+   a) under this License, provided that you make a good faith effort to
+   ensure that, in the event an Application does not supply the
+   function or data, the facility still operates, and performs
+   whatever part of its purpose remains meaningful, or
+
+   b) under the GNU GPL, with none of the additional permissions of
+   this License applicable to that copy.
+
+  3. Object Code Incorporating Material from Library Header Files.
+
+  The object code form of an Application may incorporate material from
+a header file that is part of the Library.  You may convey such object
+code under terms of your choice, provided that, if the incorporated
+material is not limited to numerical parameters, data structure
+layouts and accessors, or small macros, inline functions and templates
+(ten or fewer lines in length), you do both of the following:
+
+   a) Give prominent notice with each copy of the object code that the
+   Library is used in it and that the Library and its use are
+   covered by this License.
+
+   b) Accompany the object code with a copy of the GNU GPL and this license
+   document.
+
+  4. Combined Works.
+
+  You may convey a Combined Work under terms of your choice that,
+taken together, effectively do not restrict modification of the
+portions of the Library contained in the Combined Work and reverse
+engineering for debugging such modifications, if you also do each of
+the following:
+
+   a) Give prominent notice with each copy of the Combined Work that
+   the Library is used in it and that the Library and its use are
+   covered by this License.
+
+   b) Accompany the Combined Work with a copy of the GNU GPL and this license
+   document.
+
+   c) For a Combined Work that displays copyright notices during
+   execution, include the copyright notice for the Library among
+   these notices, as well as a reference directing the user to the
+   copies of the GNU GPL and this license document.
+
+   d) Do one of the following:
+
+       0) Convey the Minimal Corresponding Source under the terms of this
+       License, and the Corresponding Application Code in a form
+       suitable for, and under terms that permit, the user to
+       recombine or relink the Application with a modified version of
+       the Linked Version to produce a modified Combined Work, in the
+       manner specified by section 6 of the GNU GPL for conveying
+       Corresponding Source.
+
+       1) Use a suitable shared library mechanism for linking with the
+       Library.  A suitable mechanism is one that (a) uses at run time
+       a copy of the Library already present on the user's computer
+       system, and (b) will operate properly with a modified version
+       of the Library that is interface-compatible with the Linked
+       Version.
+
+   e) Provide Installation Information, but only if you would otherwise
+   be required to provide such information under section 6 of the
+   GNU GPL, and only to the extent that such information is
+   necessary to install and execute a modified version of the
+   Combined Work produced by recombining or relinking the
+   Application with a modified version of the Linked Version. (If
+   you use option 4d0, the Installation Information must accompany
+   the Minimal Corresponding Source and Corresponding Application
+   Code. If you use option 4d1, you must provide the Installation
+   Information in the manner specified by section 6 of the GNU GPL
+   for conveying Corresponding Source.)
+
+  5. Combined Libraries.
+
+  You may place library facilities that are a work based on the
+Library side by side in a single library together with other library
+facilities that are not Applications and are not covered by this
+License, and convey such a combined library under terms of your
+choice, if you do both of the following:
+
+   a) Accompany the combined library with a copy of the same work based
+   on the Library, uncombined with any other library facilities,
+   conveyed under the terms of this License.
+
+   b) Give prominent notice with the combined library that part of it
+   is a work based on the Library, and explaining where to find the
+   accompanying uncombined form of the same work.
+
+  6. Revised Versions of the GNU Lesser General Public License.
+
+  The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions
+of the GNU Lesser General Public License from time to time. Such new
+versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may
+differ in detail to address new problems or concerns.
+
+  Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the
+Library as you received it specifies that a certain numbered version
+of the GNU Lesser General Public License "or any later version"
+applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and
+conditions either of that published version or of any later version
+published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Library as you
+received it does not specify a version number of the GNU Lesser
+General Public License, you may choose any version of the GNU Lesser
+General Public License ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
+
+  If the Library as you received it specifies that a proxy can decide
+whether future versions of the GNU Lesser General Public License shall
+apply, that proxy's public statement of acceptance of any version is
+permanent authorization for you to choose that version for the
+Library.

docs/oss/licenses/MIT-Catalogs.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Eric Rakestraw
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and
+associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
+without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the
+following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial
+portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
+LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO
+EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER
+IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE
+USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

docs/oss/licenses/MIT-libyaml-v4.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Copyright (c) 2006-2010 Kirill Simonov
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
+this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in
+the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to
+use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies
+of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do
+so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

docs/oss/licenses/MIT-libyaml.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Copyright (c) 2006-2010 Kirill Simonov
+Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Kirill Simonov
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
+this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in
+the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to
+use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies
+of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do
+so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

docs/policy/agents.md

@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 # Agent Policy
 
-**Base Policy Version:** 1.0
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.3
 
-**Last Updated**: 2026-09-23
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies agents](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/agents.md)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-Agents working in this repository must read and adhere to the following house rules.
+Agents must read and follow these rules.
 
 ## Implementation Discipline
 
@@ -66,15 +67,15 @@ Examples:
 
 ## Git Commit Policy
 
-By default, create a commit after completing each coherent unit of work, using a
+By default, commit each completed, nonempty unit of work using a
 concise, plain-English message describing what changed. This policy is standing
 authorization to create those local commits; a separate user request is not
 required. An explicit user instruction to leave work uncommitted takes precedence.
 
 A unit of work is a focused, reviewable outcome, including its relevant tests and
-documentation. Do not commit after every intermediate edit or create empty commits.
+documentation.
 Complete the appropriate validation before committing. If work is incomplete or
-validation is blocked, report that state rather than presenting it as completed.
+validation is blocked, report that state accurately.
 
 Before committing:
 
@@ -82,10 +83,10 @@ Before committing:
    changes. Identify changes that predate the current unit of work.
 2. Exclude secrets, local environment files, generated junk, and unrelated changes.
 3. Stage only the files or hunks belonging to the completed unit. Use `git add .`
-   only when every included change belongs to that unit. Do not disturb unrelated
-   staged or unstaged work.
-4. Review `git diff --staged` and run appropriate checks for the change. Do not
-   repeat checks already passed for unchanged content merely to create a commit.
+   only when every included change belongs to that unit. Preserve unrelated
+   staged and unstaged work.
+4. Review `git diff --staged` and run appropriate checks for the change. Reuse
+   successful checks for unchanged content.
 5. Review `git log --oneline -n 10` and use
    `git commit -m "<concise plain-English commit message>"`.
 6. Report the commit identifier and any remaining uncommitted work.

docs/policy/architecture.md

@@ -1,10 +1,42 @@
 # Architecture Policy
 
-**Base Policy Version:** 1.0
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.3
 
-**Last Updated**: 2026-09-24
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies architecture](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/architecture.md)
 
-## Purpose and System Shape
+## Purpose And Ownership
+
+The adopted policy defines the application's purpose and the architectural
+constraints contributors must follow. It owns system boundaries, responsibility
+and dependency rules, established invariants, and explicit non-goals.
+
+Describe the concrete package inventory and implementation mechanics in internal
+documentation. Link to canonical public contracts for their exact behavior and
+to ADRs for decision rationale.
+
+## Architectural Approach
+
+Hexagonal architecture is strongly recommended, including encapsulating external
+integrations and APIs within internal adapters. Keep domain and application
+logic independent of external integration details, and make dependency direction
+clear in the adopted policy.
+
+Implement that separation with proportionate, idiomatic code. Choose interfaces
+and package layout to serve the application's actual boundaries. Use adapters
+for collaborators with external integration responsibilities.
+
+## Adopted Constraints And Implemented Structure
+
+Architectural constraints govern current and future development. Record
+implemented structure accurately, proposals and implementation status in the
+roadmap, and significant decisions and rationale in ADRs. Describe a target
+structure as implemented when its changes land.
+
+Constraints must reflect deliberately selected requirements and decisions.
+Do not promote incidental implementation choices into architectural invariants.
+
+## Application-Specific Topics
 
 Audita is a single-process Go CLI for transcript polishing. Its architecture
 separates deterministic transcript processing from external LLM effects through
@@ -74,7 +106,7 @@ future changes should treat those current contracts deliberately. Current implem
 limits are documented in the [internal overview](../internal/overview.md#current-scope);
 they are not additional prohibitions on future development.
 
-## Errors and Secret Handling
+## Trust Boundaries And Threat Scope
 
 Errors should identify the failed processing phase sufficiently for users and
 subprocess callers. Preserve the stream and exit behavior defined by the

docs/policy/documentation.md

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 # Documentation Policy
 
-**Base Policy Version:** 1.1
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.11
 
-**Last Updated**: 2026-09-23
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies documentation](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/documentation.md)
 
 ## Purpose
 
@@ -16,7 +17,7 @@ to drift for users, operators, developers, integrators, and LLM coding agents.
 
 Each authoritative fact belongs in one document. A non-owning document may give
 a short, stable summary for orientation, but it must link to the canonical owner
-instead of repeating volatile details.
+for volatile details.
 
 Volatile details include commands, flags, configuration fields and defaults,
 module keys, schemas, file names, paths, status codes, retry behavior, and
@@ -28,24 +29,26 @@ contract, maintain it only in the owning document.
 Outside `docs/roadmap/`, documentation describes implemented behavior only.
 Partial features may be described only to their implemented boundary.
 
-ADRs are the narrow exception: an ADR may record an accepted architectural
-decision before implementation, but acceptance must not be presented as proof
-that the behavior exists. The roadmap owns implementation status and sequencing
-until the decision is implemented. Current architecture, user, operator,
-integration, and internal documentation are updated when the behavior lands.
+Architectural constraints may govern future changes. Describe current structure
+from implemented behavior.
+
+ADRs may record an accepted architectural decision before implementation. The
+roadmap owns implementation status and sequencing until the decision is
+implemented. Current architecture, user, operator, integration, and internal
+documentation are updated when the behavior lands.
 
 ### Audience And Detail
 
 Write for the document's stated audience and include only the detail needed for
-its owned topic. User and operator docs should not expose implementation detail.
-Developer docs should link to user-facing and external contracts rather than
-restate them.
+its owned topic. Keep user and operator docs focused on using and operating the
+application. Developer docs should link to user-facing and external contracts
+for their definitions.
 
 ### Examples
 
 Complete copyable files belong in `examples/`. Documentation may use the
 smallest illustrative snippet needed to explain its owned topic, but should link
-to maintained examples instead of embedding a second complete copy.
+to maintained examples for complete copyable files.
 
 Examples must be valid, secret-free, and tested where practical. Commands and
 configuration used in documentation should match the application.
@@ -61,40 +64,43 @@ secret values.
 
 | Topic | Canonical owner | Owned content | Content owned elsewhere |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| Product orientation and minimal end-to-end quickstart | `README.md` | What this application is, why it is useful, one shortest successful invocation, and links onward. | Complete command reference, configuration reference, operational procedures, implementation detail. |
-| Contributor entry point | `docs/development.md` | Task-oriented reading guide, minimal contributor orientation, baseline validation commands, and links to canonical docs. | Package inventory, architecture rules, subsystem behavior, detailed change recipes. |
-| Application architecture policy | `docs/policy/architecture.md` | System shape, normative ownership, dependency direction, architectural boundaries, invariants, safety properties, and non-goals. | Concrete package inventory, implementation mechanics, contributor procedures, decision history, future work. |
-| Agent policy | `docs/policy/agents.md` | Implementation discipline for coding agents, including proportionality, idiomatic simplicity, code discovery, Git commit restrictions, and rules against inventing requirements, restrictions, guarantees, or repository policy. | Application contracts, architecture, testing policy, and contributor procedures. |
+| Product orientation and minimal end-to-end quickstart | `README.md` | Purpose, value, shortest successful invocation, and navigation, including licensing and attribution. | Complete command reference, configuration reference, operational procedures, implementation detail. |
+| Contributor entry point | `docs/development.md` | Task-oriented reading guide, contributor orientation, baseline validation commands, and canonical links. | Package inventory, architecture rules, subsystem behavior, detailed change recipes. |
+| Application architecture policy | `docs/policy/architecture.md` | System shape, normative ownership, dependency direction, boundaries, invariants, safety properties, and non-goals. | Concrete package inventory, implementation mechanics, contributor procedures, decision history, future work. |
+| Policy-set provenance and upstream navigation | `docs/policy/meta.md` | Policy-set origin, local authority, adoption baselines, and upstream adoption and update links. | Task-specific reading triggers, detailed adoption procedures, and formal attribution notices. |
+| Agent policy | `docs/policy/agents.md` | Proportionate, idiomatic implementation; graph-first code discovery, commit discipline, and rules against inventing requirements, restrictions, guarantees, or policy. | Application contracts, architecture, testing policy, and contributor procedures. |
 | Documentation policy | `docs/policy/documentation.md` | Documentation ownership, audience boundaries, maintenance rules, and ADR/document lifecycle. | Application architecture or product behavior. |
-| Testing policy | `docs/policy/testing.md` | Test philosophy, risk-based sufficiency, test boundaries, doubles, coverage guidance, regression-test policy, and criteria for adding, rewriting, or deleting tests. | Subsystem behavior, application contracts, subsystem-specific test inventories, and implementation plans. |
-| Release policy | `docs/policy/release.md` | Versioning and compatibility rules, release integrity and immutability requirements, release-documentation policy, required gates, publication controls, verification requirements, and exception policy. | Repository-specific commands, product installation guidance, CLI version semantics, historical release summaries, and CI implementation detail. |
-| Repository-specific release procedure | `docs/release.md` | Maintainer prerequisites, candidate preparation, concrete validation and publication commands, repository and registry guards, deliverable publication, consumer-facing verification, and failure recovery. | General release requirements, product installation guidance, historical release summaries, and current compatibility contracts. |
-| CLI contract | `docs/cli.md` | Commands, arguments, flags, invocation semantics, and exit codes. | End-to-end operating procedures, configuration field definitions, runtime filesystem layout, module implementation details. |
-| Configuration contract | `docs/config.md` | Discovery and precedence, file schema, fields, defaults, environment overrides, validation rules, and user-selectable module or validator keys. | Complete example files, CLI syntax, runtime state lifecycle, module implementation details. |
-| Operations | `docs/operations.md` | Runtime workflows, physical filesystem and state layout, output, cache, and debug handling, cleanup, permissions, recovery, and operational limits. | CLI flag syntax, configuration field definitions, logical output schemas, implementation mechanics. |
-| Integration contracts for external components | `docs/integrations/`, including `docs/integrations/output-files.md` for serialized outputs | External file formats and protocols, upstream and downstream contracts, logical output bundle paths and schemas, media types, and compatibility behavior. | Physical runtime placement and lifecycle, internal transformations, CLI syntax, configuration defaults. |
-| Inventory of implemented internal packages | `docs/internal/overview.md` | Current packages and components, their implemented responsibilities, and links to focused internal docs. | Normative architecture, contributor reading policy, external contracts. |
-| Behavior and architecture of internal packages | Other files under `docs/internal/` | Implementation flow, internal collaborators and state transitions, package-local guarantees and failures, and relevant tests. | Global architecture invariants, configuration definitions and defaults, external schemas, operator procedures. |
+| Testing policy | `docs/policy/testing.md` | Test philosophy, risk sufficiency, boundaries, doubles, coverage, regressions, and test maintenance. | Subsystem behavior, application contracts, subsystem-specific test inventories, and implementation plans. |
+| Release policy | `docs/policy/release.md` | Versioning, compatibility, release integrity and immutability, release documentation, proportionate gates, publication controls, completion, and required versus optional checks. | Repository-specific commands, product installation guidance, CLI version semantics, historical release summaries, and CI implementation detail. |
+| Open source licensing and attribution policy | `docs/policy/oss.md` | License defaults and author choices, COPYRIGHT and attribution formats, license/notice links, discoverability, maintenance, and concrete exceptions. | Component entries, license texts, release commands, and dependency security review. |
+| Project copyright and license grant | `COPYRIGHT` | Project identity, copyright holders and years, SPDX expression, grant, warranty disclaimer, and third-party statement. | Complete license texts and upstream component attribution. |
+| Project license texts | `LICENSE` | Complete project and incorporated companion license texts, with required project-specific fields. | General licensing policy and upstream component attribution. |
+| Upstream component attribution | `docs/oss/attribution.md` | House Format component entries: identity, material scope and modifications where applicable, copyright, license, required notices, and license, notice, and source links. | General attribution policy, exception reasoning, research narratives, compliance commentary, and complete standard license texts. |
+| Standard dependency license texts | `docs/oss/licenses/` | Complete, verbatim standard license texts shared by applicable entries. | Project-specific upstream notices, attribution prose, and policy interpretation. |
+| Repository-specific release procedure | `docs/release.md` | Maintainer prerequisites, candidate preparation, validation and publication commands and automated guards, asynchronous deliverables, delivery status, optional consumer verification, and recovery. | General release requirements, product installation guidance, historical release summaries, and current compatibility contracts. |
+| CLI contract (if applicable) | `docs/cli.md` | Commands, arguments, flags, invocation semantics, and exit codes. | End-to-end operating procedures, configuration field definitions, runtime filesystem layout, module implementation details. |
+| Configuration contract (if applicable) | `docs/config.md` | Discovery, precedence, schema, fields, defaults, environment overrides, validation, and selectable module and validator keys. | Complete example files, CLI syntax, runtime state lifecycle, module implementation details. |
+| Operations (if applicable) | `docs/operations.md` | Runtime workflows, physical filesystem and state layout, output, cache and debug handling, resume, cleanup, permissions, recovery, and limits. | CLI flag syntax, configuration field definitions, logical output schemas, implementation mechanics. |
+| Integration contracts for external components (if applicable) | `docs/integrations/`, including `docs/integrations/output-files.md` for serialized outputs | External formats and protocols, upstream and downstream contracts, logical output paths and schemas, media types, and compatibility. | Physical runtime placement and lifecycle, internal transformations, CLI syntax, configuration defaults. |
+| Inventory of implemented internal packages | `docs/internal/overview.md` | Implemented packages and components, responsibilities, and links to focused internal docs. | Normative architecture, contributor reading policy, external contracts. |
+| Behavior and architecture of internal packages | Other files under `docs/internal/` | Implementation flow, collaborators, state transitions, package-local guarantees and failures, and relevant tests. | Global architecture invariants, configuration definitions and defaults, external schemas, operator procedures. |
 | Contributor change recipes | Relevant files under `docs/internal/`, including `docs/internal/cli-config.md`, `docs/internal/modules.md`, and `docs/internal/validators.md` | Concrete editing and validation steps for each component. | Contributor orientation, global policy, and definitions of external contracts. |
 | Architectural decision records | `docs/adr/` | Significant decisions, context, alternatives, rationale, consequences, and supersession history. | Current behavior reference, implementation status, task sequencing. |
-| Future work and implementation status | `docs/roadmap/` | Proposed, accepted, deferred, or rejected work; implementation status; sequencing; and task breakdowns. | Implemented behavior reference and architectural decision rationale. |
-| Release-note history | `docs/releases/` | One checked-in historical summary for each source release made under the procedure. The note at the immutable tag is that release's record. | Current commands, behavior, contracts, and compatibility definitions. |
-| Complete copyable artifacts | `examples/` | Maintained configuration, inputs, and other files intended to be copied or run. | Field-by-field reference, command reference, prose explanation. |
+| Future work and implementation status | `docs/roadmap/` | Proposed, accepted, deferred, or rejected work; implementation status, sequencing, and task breakdowns. | Implemented behavior reference and architectural decision rationale. |
+| Release-note history | `docs/releases/` | One checked-in summary per source release under the procedure; the note at its immutable tag is the release record. | Current commands, behavior, contracts, and compatibility definitions. |
+| Complete copyable artifacts | `examples/` | Maintained configuration, inputs, and other copyable or runnable files. | Field-by-field reference, command reference, prose explanation. |
 
-Documents that do not exist are required only when the corresponding interface
-or responsibility exists. Do not create placeholder API, consumer, integration,
-or operations documents for behavior the application does not have. Audita has
-retired its standalone troubleshooting guide; concrete operating and recovery
-procedures belong in `docs/operations.md`.
+Create supporting documents for existing interfaces and responsibilities when
+substantive content is available.
+Audita has retired its standalone troubleshooting guide; concrete operating and
+recovery procedures belong in `docs/operations.md`.
 
 ## Boundary Rules
 
 ### Orientation
 
-The README owns product orientation. The developer guide routes contributors.
-Architecture owns normative structure. Internal overview owns the current
-concrete component map. These documents may link to one another but should not
-maintain parallel package or behavior descriptions.
+Link among orientation, architecture, and internal documents; maintain each
+package or behavior description in its canonical owner.
 
 ### Commands, Configuration, And Operations
 
@@ -108,12 +114,16 @@ other contracts.
 
 The release policy defines requirements and invariants that every release must
 satisfy. The repository-specific release procedure defines the commands and
-workflow maintainers use to satisfy that policy. Release notes are immutable
-historical summaries, not current-state contract owners: the checked-in note at
-an immutable tag records that release, while current canonical documentation
-must change with the behavior it describes. Do not use a release procedure or
-release note to weaken policy, redefine current behavior, or defer required
-documentation updates.
+workflow maintainers use to satisfy that policy. Release notes record history
+at immutable tags. Maintain current behavior in its canonical documentation,
+update it with the corresponding behavior changes, and keep release procedures
+consistent with adopted policy.
+
+### Project Licensing And Upstream Attribution
+
+README and release documents link to the canonical licensing and attribution
+materials under the [OSS policy](oss.md). The release procedure owns URL
+construction and publication mechanics.
 
 ### Contracts And Implementation
 

docs/policy/meta.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Policy Set Provenance
+
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.0
+
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies meta](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/meta.md)
+
+## Origin And Local Authority
+
+This repository's policy set is adapted from
+[Standard Repository Policies](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy).
+The adopted local policies govern work in this repository. Upstream revisions
+become local policy through deliberate adoption, preserving local decisions.
+Each policy's `Upstream Source` identifies its adopted baseline.
+
+## Adoption And Updates
+
+For policy adoption, upstream revision reviews, and updates, consult the
+[upstream adoption and update guide](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/branch/main/docs/adoption.md).
+That guide and the reference example collection are maintained upstream and
+accessed through links. Keep discovery links pointed at the current upstream
+project and guide; keep adopted-source and example links pinned to commits.
+
+The local [developer guide](../development.md) routes tasks to applicable
+policies. Formal credit and licensing notices for the copied policy material
+belong in the local [attribution document](../oss/attribution.md).

docs/policy/oss.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+# Open Source Licensing And Attribution Policy
+
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.8
+
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies oss](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/oss.md)
+
+## Purpose And Scope
+
+This policy defines project licensing conventions and a repeatable House Format
+for upstream attribution and license notices. It covers the project's own code
+and upstream components incorporated into or distributed with the application
+or library, including relevant transitive dependencies and copied code,
+documentation, or assets.
+Determine treatment from the component's terms and actual use.
+
+Consulting development guidance or using tooling alone does not require an
+attribution entry. Copying or adapting documentation for inclusion in the
+repository is different: preserve its applicable attribution and license terms.
+A material's role as development guidance does not exempt copied documents.
+Apply any express permissions for attribution-free reuse of example formatting.
+
+The baseline is a publicly available source repository with releases published
+alongside it. The format is independent of language, forge, and build system.
+It does not require attribution for every development tool, establish license
+compatibility, or resolve every obligation arising from use or distribution.
+
+Audita uses the existing GPL-3.0-or-later application grant in
+[`COPYRIGHT`](../../COPYRIGHT). The Gitea distribution and publication procedure
+are documented in the [release runbook](../release.md).
+
+## Canonical Locations
+
+The [documentation policy](documentation.md) assigns ownership:
+
+- `COPYRIGHT`: project name, copyright statements, SPDX expression, grant,
+  warranty disclaimer, and third-party statement.
+- `LICENSE` contains the complete, unmodified project license text, including
+  incorporated companion text. Dependency attribution does not relicense the project.
+- `docs/oss/attribution.md`: canonical component entries.
+- `docs/oss/licenses/`: complete, verbatim standard and applicable companion texts.
+
+Use recognizable license filenames, such as `Apache-2.0.txt` or `LGPL-3.0.txt`.
+A shared standard text may serve multiple entries. Keep explanations outside
+license texts and preserve distinct versions and exceptions.
+
+## Upstream Reference Examples
+
+Use the commit-pinned upstream examples to create actual project notices.
+Retain their links and keep the example collection upstream; keep applicable
+license texts locally as specified above.
+
+## Project Licensing
+
+Unless the author specifies otherwise, use **GPL version 3 or later**
+(`GPL-3.0-or-later`) for applications and **LGPL version 3 or later**
+(`LGPL-3.0-or-later`) for libraries. An author's explicit choice takes precedence:
+for example, a one-off script may use MIT. Such a choice requires no exception
+rationale, additional approval, or compensating controls under this policy.
+
+These defaults guide new license selection. Adopting this policy does not
+relicense existing code or override third-party terms. Preserve an existing
+license unless the author deliberately changes it. For mixed-purpose projects,
+follow the author's selected scope rather than inferring different licenses for
+individual packages.
+
+Use the upstream [application COPYRIGHT example](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/examples/licensing/application/COPYRIGHT)
+or [library COPYRIGHT example](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/examples/licensing/library/COPYRIGHT)
+to create the project’s root `COPYRIGHT` file.
+Use verified project names, contribution years, and copyright holders.
+For another selected license, adapt the grant, SPDX expression, disclaimer, and
+text references together to reflect the author's selected grant.
+
+For GPLv3 projects, copy the complete GPLv3 text into `LICENSE`. For LGPLv3
+projects, place the complete LGPLv3 text followed by the complete GPLv3 text in
+`LICENSE`; the LGPL incorporates the GPL terms. Keep the texts unmodified and
+place project-specific statements in `COPYRIGHT`. For the default grants, the
+grant and SPDX expression in `COPYRIGHT` must expressly identify `or-later`;
+follow the author’s choice if a different grant is selected.
+
+For other licenses, provide their complete text and any required project-specific
+fields; the standard reference collection remains unchanged. Keep `COPYRIGHT`,
+`LICENSE`, SPDX expressions, and README descriptions consistent with the actual
+grant. This convention introduces no blanket requirement for per-file headers;
+preserve notices or add them where the applicable terms require them.
+
+Identify separately licensed documentation or assets in the project grant, with
+links to their attribution and license information. An application's default
+code license does not override the terms of incorporated documentation.
+
+## Upstream Attribution House Format
+
+Begin `docs/oss/attribution.md` with `# Open Source Attribution Notices`,
+followed directly by component entries. These comprise the complete document.
+
+Each entry presents these five fields in order, with blank lines between them:
+
+1. **Project name** as a level-two heading. An optional identification paragraph
+   may follow, such as `Selected module: MODULE at VERSION.` with the module and
+   version in backticks. For copied documentation, a concise `Material:` sentence
+   may identify the affected files and whether they were adapted or copied
+   without modification. A factual qualifier such as `(transitive dependency)`
+   is permitted. Limit optional identification prose to factual component and
+   material scope.
+2. **Upstream copyright statement or statements**, preserving their wording.
+   Put multiple statements in separate paragraphs. Include this field when the
+   selected upstream source supplies an applicable statement; otherwise, omit it.
+3. **SPDX license identifier or expression**, when applicable, using
+   `SPDX-License-Identifier: EXPRESSION`.
+4. **License and notice links**, beginning `License and notices:`, separated
+   by ` | `, and ending with a period. Label local standard texts by license
+   name, such as `MIT` or `Apache 2.0`. Label upstream files by their actual
+   filenames, such as `COPYRIGHT`, `LICENSE`, `NOTICE`, or `PATENTS`.
+5. **Source repository link**, rendered exactly as `[Source](COMMIT_URL).`.
+
+Use the upstream [attribution example](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/examples/licensing/attribution.md)
+to create the project’s `docs/oss/attribution.md`.
+The example illustrates omitted fields and multiple copyrights and licenses.
+Replace the uppercase placeholders and illustrative URLs with actual component
+information. Local license links are relative to the destination
+`docs/oss/attribution.md`; copy the applicable texts into its `licenses/`
+directory. Do not copy example entries for components the project does not use.
+
+These are five fields, not a line limit. Omit the SPDX field when no applicable
+identifier exists; identify nonstandard terms through the linked text. Preserve
+licensing alternatives and exceptions, and record a selected option when
+relevant through the factual license identification. Do not invent an identifier
+or silently resolve an unsettled licensing choice.
+
+Keep entries factual. Do not add agent-authored explanations of license
+expressions, file-level license scope, research performed, retained source
+notices, or compliance conclusions. Avoid filler such as "none is invented
+here" and embellished link labels such as "upstream LICENSE", "additional
+patent grant", or "at the imported commit". Preserve actual required upstream
+content; this rule excludes editorial additions, not required notices. Policy
+interpretation and exception reasoning belong in the adopted OSS policy or an
+appropriate decision record, not the attribution document.
+
+## License Texts And Upstream Links
+
+Link standard license texts to their local copies. Link project-specific
+notices to their upstream copies. Every upstream repository or notice link must
+identify the exact commit corresponding to the
+imported version, including the selected source revision for copied material.
+
+Classify material according to its contents. An upstream `LICENSE`,
+`COPYING`, or similar file may contain project-specific notices or exceptions
+in addition to standard wording. Link both the local standard text and the
+commit-specific upstream file when needed. Make companion license texts directly
+reachable from the entry.
+
+For project-specific license and attribution material, this policy accepts
+direct links to the applicable upstream texts as satisfying reproduction,
+inclusion, or copy requirements. This is the adopted house interpretation.
+Agents must apply it without adding local-copy requirements or seeking repeated
+approval solely because a license uses those terms.
+
+This interpretation concerns notice reproduction. Concrete obligations such as
+marking modified files or supplying corresponding source receive their own
+applicable treatment. Preserve required notices already present in incorporated
+source files; the central attribution entry does not authorize stripping them.
+
+## Discoverability
+
+End the project's README with two friendly statements linking to its actual
+grant in `COPYRIGHT` and the attribution document. For example, for a project
+with the stated license:
+
+```markdown
+PROJECT_NAME is licensed under the [LGPL v3.0 or later](COPYRIGHT).
+
+[Open Source attribution notices](docs/oss/attribution.md) are available.
+```
+
+Each new checked-in release document and its hosted download page must end
+with links whose visible text is `COPYRIGHT | LICENSE | ATTRIBUTION`. Use absolute
+URLs to those files at the release's immutable tag or corresponding immutable source
+revision so the links work in both locations. This release navigation is distinct
+from upstream component links, which must use the imported commit.
+
+Reuse the checked-in release document as the hosted release body where supported.
+The release procedure owns concrete URLs and publication mechanics for delivering
+the links through the selected channel. Do not maintain duplicate notice lists.
+These conventions do not by themselves require separate downloadable license
+assets, source bundles, or a different binary package format.
+
+## Maintenance And Exceptions
+
+Update project licensing statements together when the author changes the grant
+or its scope. Update upstream notices in the change that adds, removes, upgrades,
+copies, or changes the distribution of a relevant component. Check the selected source's license
+and notices rather than assuming they are unchanged. Update affected entries,
+commit links, and texts; retain historical versions through Git.
+
+When the toolchain used for distributed binaries changes, check the Go runtime
+and standard-library entries against that toolchain's exact source revision,
+including any vendored packages incorporated into those binaries.
+
+Check affected statements, faithful standard-text copies, and link destinations
+as part of ordinary change review. For a future release tag, check intended file
+paths against the candidate source; the tag need not resolve remotely before
+publication. Do not add publication-time network checks, CI polling, recurring
+legal sign-offs, mandatory scanners, or a full software bill of materials merely
+to implement this policy.
+
+Use the House Format routinely. Raise an exception only for a concrete obligation
+or unresolved rights question it does not address, including any arising from a
+particular distribution channel. Record the issue and selected treatment in the
+adopted OSS policy or an appropriate decision record. Attribution entries
+contain the resulting factual identification and required material, without
+repeating that reasoning. Resolve the issue before the affected use or
+distribution without reopening settled choices.
+Common ownership of projects is neither required nor a blanket exception.
+
+Apply the formatting convention prospectively. Do not rewrite published tags,
+notes, binaries, or checksums to retrofit it. Address actual omissions deliberately
+under the applicable terms and the [release correction policy](release.md#immutability-and-failure-recovery).
+Ordinary attribution maintenance and release links are preparation work, not new
+release approval gates.

docs/policy/release.md

@@ -1,40 +1,47 @@
 # Release Policy
 
-**Base Policy Version:** 1.0
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.4
 
-**Last Updated**: 2026-09-23
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies release](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/release.md)
 
 ## Purpose
 
-This policy defines the minimum requirements for selecting, validating,
-publishing, verifying, and correcting releases. Its goal is to make every
-release intentional, reproducible from an exact source revision, documented
-for consumers, and safe from retrospective replacement.
+This policy defines a proportionate workflow for validating and publishing an
+intended source revision under a fresh version. Releases should require little
+routine intervention, avoid repeated work, and preserve published contents.
 
-The repository-specific commands that implement these requirements belong in
-`docs/release.md`. Historical release summaries belong in `docs/releases/`.
-This is an Audita-specific adaptation of the base policy, not a requirement to
-implement the standard unchanged. Adapt it further when Audita's needs warrant;
-the canonical procedure must agree with the adopted policy.
+The repository-specific commands belong in `docs/release.md`. Historical release
+summaries belong in `docs/releases/`. The procedure must agree with the adopted
+policy and link to it rather than introduce additional release requirements.
 
-## Release Model
+## Release Model And Completion
 
-A release identifies one exact source commit with an immutable version tag and
-its checked-in release note. The primary release branch is `main`.
+A source release identifies one exact committed source revision through an
+immutable version tag and a version-matched, checked-in release note. The
+primary release branch is `main` unless the adopted policy specifies otherwise.
+The procedure must name the authoritative publication remote.
 
-Release success means that the intended version tag has been created and
-successfully pushed to the authoritative remote with its source commit. The
-release procedure ends at that point. It must never wait for CI to complete or
-require successful CI status, artifact publication, or consumer installation as
-a completion gate.
+A successful push of the intended tag, with its source commit available on the
+authoritative primary branch, completes the release. The source commit may be
+pushed before the tag or published together with it through an atomic push.
+The procedure must choose and document the supported approach.
 
-CI builds and publishes binaries and checksums asynchronously from the tagged
-source. Delayed or failed automation does not reverse release success. Artifact
-availability is a separate status and must not be claimed merely because the tag
-was pushed. Published artifacts must be traceable to the tagged source.
+Release commands must finish at successful publication. They must not wait for
+or poll CI, require successful CI status, inspect downloadable artifacts, or
+check consumer installation or Go module availability as completion gates.
+A failed or ambiguous push requires resolving the authoritative remote state
+before declaring success or retrying; successful pushes do not require a
+separate remote read-back gate.
 
-Automation must not silently change the source candidate, move a published tag,
-or replace an existing published artifact.
+Repositories may publish source only. Additional binaries, images, packages,
+checksums, or other declared deliverables may be published asynchronously from
+the tagged source. The procedure must identify those deliverables and the
+responsibility of their automation. Published deliverables must be traceable
+to that source and identify the same version.
+
+Track source-release completion and artifact delivery separately. Report delivery
+failures and optional investigations under artifact-delivery status.
 
 ## Supported Platforms
 
@@ -51,11 +58,14 @@ prerequisites.
 ## Versioning And Compatibility
 
 Stable releases use Semantic Versioning in the form `vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH`, with
-no leading zeroes. Each version must be unused locally and on the authoritative
-remote before publication begins.
+no leading zeroes. Prereleases require an explicit adopted policy defining
+their format and use.
 
-Unless an adopted policy explicitly supports and defines prereleases,
-prerelease versions are not permitted.
+The selected version must be unused locally and on the authoritative remote.
+Do not require queries to every configured remote or publication service.
+A version known to have already been published must not be reused, even if the
+normal guards do not inspect that channel. Adding a distribution channel
+requires a deliberate update to the policy and procedure where needed.
 
 For releases at or after `v1.0.0`:
 
@@ -68,101 +78,133 @@ configuration, data, integration, or compatibility contract when the release
 note explains the impact and required consumer action. A patch release must
 not intentionally break those contracts within its minor line.
 
-A repository with additional compatibility promises must define them in its
-adopted policy or canonical contract documentation. A release note may explain
-a compatibility change, but it must not redefine the current compatibility
-contract.
+Additional compatibility promises and deliberate exceptions belong in the
+adopted policy or canonical contract documentation. Release notes explain
+changes; they do not redefine current compatibility contracts.
 
-## Release Documentation
+## Release Documentation And Preparation
 
-Every release made under this policy must include
-`docs/releases/<version>.md` in the tagged source tree. The filename must use
-the complete version tag, and the document must begin with a title containing
-the product name and that exact version.
+Every new release must include `docs/releases/<version>.md` in the tagged
+source tree. Use the complete version tag as the filename and begin with a
+title containing the product name and that exact version.
 
-Release notes must contain a short summary and any relevant compatibility or
-upgrade instructions. Fixed sections and explicit no-action boilerplate are not
-required. Keep notes proportionate to the change.
+Include a short summary and any relevant compatibility impact or upgrade
+instructions. Choose sections suited to the release and keep the note
+proportionate to the change.
 
-Release notes are immutable historical summaries. They should link to current
-canonical documentation for exact behavior. Every affected canonical document
-must be updated in the same candidate; a release note must not substitute for
-current documentation or defer required documentation changes.
+Keep exact current contracts in their canonical documents and update affected
+documentation with the behavior change. Link to those documents from the note
+where useful. If annotated tags are used, derive their summary from the
+checked-in note.
 
-## Candidate Preparation And Validation
+Include the release footer defined by the [OSS policy](oss.md#discoverability)
+in each new release document and preserve it on the hosted download page. The
+release procedure defines the concrete URLs and publication mechanics. Prepare
+these links with the release note; they do not add a network check or approval
+gate.
 
-Use the minimum gates needed for confidence in Audita's release. Provide one
-local command for the selected automated checks, following the
-[testing policy](testing.md). Run the deterministic, offline default test suite
-once for the candidate and verify that both required Linux targets build.
-Avoid duplicate test runs solely to satisfy separate release phases.
+Handle version selection, release-note content, and retirement of completed
+roadmaps during preparation. Preserve planned and deferred work and repair
+affected links when retiring roadmaps. Reuse ordinary change review for
+unintended files, credentials, and private data. Scope release-content review
+to the tagged source.
 
-Additional checks must address a concrete risk not already covered. Do not
-inherit a mandatory linting, documentation audit, platform matrix, or live-service
-checklist solely from the base policy. Documentation migration validation is
-separate work, not automatically a recurring release gate.
+## Candidate Validation
 
-Automate mechanical guards. Do not require manual approvals, sign-offs, laptop
-testing, or post-publication inspection as release gates. Version selection and
+Provide one publication command that validates the final committed candidate,
+checks publication state, and publishes the intended refs. A validation-only
+mode or command may be provided for diagnosis, but must not be a required step
+before publication repeats the same checks.
+
+Run the complete deterministic, offline default test suite once for the final
+candidate, following the [testing policy](testing.md). For repositories that
+publish builds, verify the required build targets. Select those targets for
+the application's actual support commitments; native testing on each platform
+and access to particular hardware are not default release prerequisites.
+
+Additional gates must address a concrete risk that the existing checks do not
+adequately cover. Do not automatically require linting, race testing, module
+hygiene audits, documentation audits, credential scans, example validation, or
+expanded platform matrices solely because they are possible. Retain such
+checks when their distinct protection justifies their cost. A one-time migration
+check must not silently become a permanent release requirement.
+
+Release tests must not require real credentials, mutable application services,
+paid APIs, provider probes, or inference calls. The procedure may describe dependency
+preparation separately from offline validation.
+
+Avoid duplicate validation across release phases. Successful checks for the
+same final candidate need not be repeated solely to satisfy another phase;
+any reuse must clearly apply to that exact candidate. Persistent validation
+caches are not required. If the candidate changes, validate the new candidate.
+Cheap publication-state checks may be repeated immediately before pushing
+because local or remote state may have changed during validation.
+
+Automate mechanical guards. Do not require manual approvals, sign-offs, or
+routine confirmations as release gates. Version selection and
 a concise release summary remain preparation inputs, not separate approval rounds.
 
 ## Publication Guards
 
-The procedure must automate the small set of checks needed to publish the
-intended source under a fresh version:
+Automate the checks needed to publish the intended source under a fresh version:
 
-- valid, unused version on the authoritative remote;
-- clean worktree and index on the primary release branch;
-- the exact candidate that passed the local checks, including its matching note;
-- publication of that source commit and the exact intended tag.
+- the version has the adopted format and is unused locally and on the
+  authoritative remote;
+- the worktree and index are clean on the primary release branch;
+- the source being published is the exact candidate that passed validation,
+  including its matching release note;
+- the remote primary branch already identifies that candidate, or an atomic
+  source/tag push will advance it to that candidate without discarding remote
+  history; and
+- the tag identifies the validated candidate and only the intended refs are
+  published.
 
-Do not require remote CI success. Avoid an additional manual confirmation for
-each mechanical guard. Publish explicit refs rather than all local tags.
-A successful push is the completion signal; a failed or ambiguous push must be
-resolved against remote ref state before declaring success or retrying.
+Fetch the authoritative branch and tag state as needed for these checks.
+Do not force branch or tag updates to bypass a failed guard. Publish explicit
+refs rather than all local tags. Do not require CI success, publication-service
+availability checks, or a separate manual confirmation for each guard.
 
-## Immutability And Correction
+## Immutability And Failure Recovery
 
-Published version tags and published deliverables are immutable. Do not move,
-overwrite, recreate, or delete a published tag. Do not replace an artifact,
-image, package, checksum, signature, provenance statement, or release note
-under an already published version.
+Published version tags and published contents are immutable. Do not move,
+overwrite, recreate, or delete a published tag, or replace a published artifact,
+checksum, signature, provenance statement, or release note under that version.
+The checked-in note at the immutable tag is that release's historical record.
 
-If validation fails before publication, correct and commit the candidate, then
-rerun the release command. Validation must apply to the exact candidate. An
-unpublished local tag may be removed after confirming that it was never published
-or used by a release channel.
+If validation fails before publication, correct and commit the candidate and
+rerun the publication command. If a push fails or its outcome is ambiguous,
+inspect the authoritative remote before retrying. Remove an unpublished local
+tag only after confirming it was never published or used by a release channel.
+An unavailable remote leaves publication status unknown; do not overwrite a tag
+to resolve uncertainty.
 
-If a defect is discovered after publication, leave the published release intact. Correct the defect on the primary branch, choose a
-new patch version or other semantically appropriate new version, write a new
-matching release note, and perform the complete release procedure again.
+Transient network, authentication, CI, or consumer-availability failures do not
+by themselves require a new version. Asynchronous delivery may be retried from
+the same immutable tag. Missing artifacts may be published later, provided
+existing published contents are not replaced and the additions remain consistent
+with the tagged source and any already-published checksum manifest. If that
+cannot be achieved, publish a new version.
 
-A distribution channel's supported yank, deprecation, or advisory mechanism
-may warn consumers away from a defective release, but it must not replace that
-release's contents or reuse its version.
+A defect requiring changes to published source or contents requires a corrected
+commit, a new semantically appropriate version, a matching release note, and
+the release procedure again. Leave the original release intact. A channel's
+yank, deprecation, or advisory mechanism may warn consumers away from a defective
+release without replacing its contents or reusing its version.
 
 ## Repository Release Procedure
 
-Maintain [docs/release.md](../release.md) as a short, executable maintainer runbook.
-It must identify prerequisites, authoritative remote, version and note preparation,
-one local validation command, automated source/tag guards, exact publication
-commands, and failure handling. It must name the asynchronous automation and link
-to this policy for supported platforms and release-success semantics.
+Maintain `docs/release.md` as a short, executable maintainer runbook. It must
+identify:
 
-Describe how to diagnose or retry failed artifact delivery separately from release
-completion. Missing artifacts may be published later from the same immutable tag;
-existing published artifacts must not be overwritten. A source defect requires a
-new version. No polling or CI waiting belongs in the release command.
+1. prerequisites, primary branch, and authoritative remote;
+2. version and release-note preparation;
+3. one publication command with its selected local checks and automated guards;
+4. declared deliverables, required build targets, and automation responsibilities;
+5. the successful-push completion point and separately reported delivery status;
+   and
+6. failure handling, ambiguous-push recovery, and asynchronous delivery retries.
 
-## Audita Adaptations
-
-The maintainer approved these deviations from the base policy on 2026-09-23:
-
-- Audita's needs govern policy adaptation rather than strict template compliance.
-- Only Linux amd64 and arm64 are required; macOS arm64 is best effort.
-- A successful tag push completes the release; asynchronous CI cannot block it.
-- Gates are minimal, automated where practical, and avoid redundant validation
-  and human intervention.
-
-The [release procedure](../release.md) and its linked scripts implement these
-requirements. CI delivery remains asynchronous.
+Use copyable commands where practical. Keep optional diagnostics and consumer
+verification clearly optional. The procedure must not turn preparation work,
+ordinary change review, or post-publication investigation into additional
+release gates.

docs/policy/testing.md

@@ -1,43 +1,31 @@
 # Testing Policy
 
-**Base Policy Version:** 1.0
+**Base Policy Version:** 1.3
 
-**Last Updated**: 2026-09-23
+**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
+**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies testing](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/testing.md)
 
 ## Purpose
 
 Our tests exist to make **incorrect changes expensive and correct changes cheap**.
 
-We do not optimize for test count, line coverage, exhaustive isolation, or the fewest possible tests. We optimize for sufficient confidence in important behavior while imposing as little unnecessary friction as possible on future development.
+We optimize for sufficient confidence in important behavior while minimizing friction on future development.
 
 ## Every test has a cost
 
-Testing is not an unqualified good. Every test imposes both an immediate cost and a continuing lifetime cost.
-
-A test must be:
-
-- written and reviewed;
-- understood by future maintainers and coding agents;
-- executed in local and CI workflows;
-- diagnosed when it fails;
-- updated when legitimate behavior changes;
-- maintained as fixtures, APIs, and dependencies evolve; and
-- removed or rewritten when it becomes redundant, brittle, misleading, or obsolete.
-
-Tests also create cognitive and architectural friction. They can constrain refactoring, duplicate policy, slow feedback loops, add noise to failures, and cause harmless implementation changes to require unrelated edits across the suite.
+Every test has an immediate and continuing cost: writing, review, execution,
+diagnosis, fixture maintenance, and updates when legitimate behavior changes.
+Tests can also constrain refactoring, duplicate policy, and add failure noise.
 
 A test is warranted only when the confidence it provides justifies these costs.
-
-Apply this cost-benefit analysis at two levels:
+Evaluate that tradeoff at two levels:
 
 1. **Per test:** What realistic defect does this test detect, how consequential would that defect be, and is that protection worth the test's lifetime cost?
 2. **Across the suite:** Does this collection provide materially more confidence than a smaller, simpler suite would?
 
-The preferred test suite is a **lean suite that provides sufficient confidence in the risks that matter, without redundant or low-value tests**. We seek sufficient confidence with the least unnecessary testing friction, not the fewest possible tests.
+Some friction is intentional. Tests should make dangerous changes—such as breaking compatibility, corrupting data, violating security boundaries, or reintroducing subtle bugs—require deliberate review. Keep ordinary internal changes inexpensive.
 
-Some friction is intentional. Tests should make dangerous changes—such as breaking compatibility, corrupting data, violating security boundaries, or reintroducing subtle bugs—require deliberate review. They should not make ordinary internal changes needlessly expensive.
-
-The cost of a test is not a reason to omit testing by default. Do not cite maintenance cost abstractly. When omitting a plausible test, be able to state why the protected failure is low-risk, already covered, obvious, reversible, or cheaper to detect elsewhere. For consequential, subtle, or difficult-to-observe behavior, the presumption should favor testing.
+Evaluate maintenance cost against the specific failure being protected. When omitting a plausible test, be able to state why the protected failure is low-risk, already covered, obvious, reversible, or cheaper to detect elsewhere. For consequential, subtle, or difficult-to-observe behavior, the presumption should favor testing.
 
 ## Default testing style
 
@@ -69,15 +57,27 @@ To the extent the following features are present in the application, prioritize
 6. Previously observed or plausible regressions.
 7. Representative integration and end-to-end workflows.
 
-A package-level contract is behavior relied upon by another package or major collaborator, not every observable detail of a package implementation.
+A package-level contract comprises behavior relied upon by another package or major collaborator.
 
-For behavior involving **data integrity, destructive operations, compatibility, security, concurrency, idempotency, or recovery**, presume that durable tests are required unless the behavior is already credibly protected at another layer.
+Choose tests for requested behavior and established contracts. Tests must not
+introduce new restrictions, guarantees, or threat scenarios merely because they
+could be asserted. Follow the [agent policy](agents.md) when deciding whether a
+behavior belongs to the contract; current implementation behavior alone is not
+sufficient authority.
+
+For established behavior involving **data integrity, destructive operations,
+compatibility, security, concurrency, idempotency, or recovery**, favor durable
+tests for realistic failures whose consequences warrant protection. Identify
+the failure and the existing contract it would violate. These categories call
+for attention, not an automatic test inventory or permission to strengthen the
+application's guarantees. Account for protection already provided at other layers.
 
 Do not add tests merely because a function, branch, or line exists. Do not add a test when the same meaningful risk is already adequately protected elsewhere.
 
 ## Choose the right test boundary
 
-Test through the narrowest stable boundary that expresses the behavior clearly.
+Choose the narrowest stable boundary that expresses the behavior clearly and
+provides durable confidence with minimal incidental coupling.
 
 This is often the package API, but it may instead be:
 
@@ -85,28 +85,15 @@ This is often the package API, but it may instead be:
 - a package-level operation when several internal collaborators jointly produce the behavior; or
 - a larger integration boundary when correctness emerges from interaction with a real dependency.
 
-Do not force all behavior through oversized end-to-end tests. Do not test every private helper merely because it exists. Choose the boundary that gives durable confidence with the least incidental coupling.
-
 ## Test behavior, not implementation
 
-A test should protect a decision, contract, or invariant. A test must not memorialize the current implementation.
+A test should protect a selected decision, contract, or invariant.
 
-Before adding or retaining a test, ask:
+A test is suspect when it primarily detects changes to private constants or
+helpers, equivalent operation ordering, incidental formatting, equivalent
+algorithms, or internal structure that preserves behavior.
 
-> What realistic defect would this test catch?
-
-A test is suspect when its main purpose is to detect that someone:
-
-- changed an internal constant;
-- renamed or split a private helper;
-- reordered equivalent internal operations;
-- changed incidental formatting;
-- replaced one correct algorithm with another; or
-- refactored internal object structure without changing behavior.
-
-Refactoring should normally require no test edits unless the refactored structure is itself part of the contract.
-
-A test can be factually correct and still have negative value. Accurately describing current behavior is not sufficient; the protected behavior must be important enough to justify the future friction.
+Behavioral tests should normally remain stable through internal refactoring that preserves the contract.
 
 ## Expected effects of different changes
 
@@ -123,12 +110,13 @@ A test failing is not the same as a test needing to be edited. Many tests may co
 
 ## Separate mechanism from policy
 
-Configurable thresholds and defaults must not be duplicated throughout the test suite.
+Derive expectations from test-controlled configuration and relationships.
 
-For example, do not encode an internal concurrency limit indirectly:
+For this example, assume the selected contract rejects a request to start more
+processes than a configured limit. Do not encode its production default indirectly:
 
 ```go
-// Production policy:
+// Production default:
 const maxConcurrency = 4
 
 // Brittle test:
@@ -146,25 +134,30 @@ require.NoError(t, runner.Start(limit))
 require.ErrorIs(t, runner.Start(limit+1), ErrTooMuchConcurrency)
 ```
 
-The test should prove:
+For this selected contract, the test should prove:
 
 - the configured limit is accepted; and
 - one beyond the configured limit is rejected.
 
+Rejection is not a general requirement for concurrency control. If the selected
+contract queues excess work or limits active workers while accepting larger
+batches, test that behavior instead. Do not add rejection or a configurable
+limit solely to reproduce this example.
+
 The production default should be tested exactly only when its literal value is itself a public, operational, safety, protocol, or compatibility requirement.
 
-Apply the same rule to limits, timeouts, capacities, retry counts, and ranges: test relationships and behavior, not duplicated literals.
+Apply the same rule to limits, timeouts, capacities, retry counts, and ranges: test relationships and behavior.
 
-For concurrency limits, test both kinds of behavior when relevant:
+For established concurrency limits, distinguish these behaviors where the contract requires them:
 
-1. **Configuration enforcement:** invalid or excessive requested values are handled correctly.
+1. **Configuration handling:** values are accepted or rejected according to the selected contract.
 2. **Runtime enforcement:** observed peak concurrency never exceeds the configured limit.
 
-Use a test-controlled limit and measure the behavior relative to that limit. Do not merely assert today's default value.
+Use a test-controlled limit and measure the behavior relative to that limit.
 
-## Avoid semantic duplication across layers
+## Assign each behavior a test owner
 
-Each behavior should have a clear test owner.
+Where these layers exist, assign ownership as follows:
 
 - Parser tests own parsing cases.
 - Validator tests own validation rules.
@@ -174,9 +167,7 @@ Each behavior should have a clear test owner.
 - CLI tests own argument and configuration mapping.
 - End-to-end tests prove that representative assembled workflows work.
 
-Higher-level tests should not repeat every lower-level case. A single intentional policy change should not require unrelated edits across many test files.
-
-Tests that are individually reasonable may still be collectively redundant. Evaluate the marginal value of each additional test in light of the protection already provided by the rest of the suite.
+Give each layer its distinct responsibility and keep expectation updates localized to the contract being changed.
 
 ## Use test doubles deliberately
 
@@ -197,104 +188,76 @@ Mocks are appropriate when the contract includes facts such as:
 - an expensive API is called no more than once; or
 - a security audit event is emitted.
 
-Do not use mocks merely to isolate every object or reproduce the implementation's call graph.
-
 ## Go-specific guidance
 
-Use:
+Select techniques by behavior and risk:
 
 - table-driven tests for meaningful behavioral categories and boundaries;
 - `t.TempDir()` for real filesystem behavior;
 - `httptest.Server` for realistic HTTP interactions;
-- fuzz tests for parsers, normalization, path handling, and broad input spaces;
+- fuzz tests when exploring broad input spaces, such as parsers or path handling, adds useful protection beyond representative cases;
 - golden files only when the complete output is intentionally stable;
 - integration tests where correctness depends on component interaction; and
-- a small number of representative end-to-end tests.
+- a small number of representative end-to-end tests when assembled workflows expose meaningful risks not adequately covered at narrower boundaries.
 
-Avoid exact error-string assertions unless the wording is itself contractual. Prefer `errors.Is`, `errors.As`, typed errors, or structured error fields.
+Prefer `errors.Is`, `errors.As`, typed errors, or structured error fields. Use exact error-wording assertions only when the wording is contractual.
 
-At CLI boundaries, prefer exit classifications, structured output, and the smallest stable semantic fragment needed to identify the error. Do not snapshot complete diagnostic wording unless it is contractual.
+At CLI boundaries, prefer exit classifications, structured output, and the smallest stable semantic fragment needed to identify the error. Use complete diagnostic snapshots only when the wording is contractual.
 
 Golden-file updates must require an explicit local flag. CI must not update golden files automatically, and reviewers must inspect the semantic diff before accepting an update.
 
-Keep tests readable and direct. Test helpers and fixture frameworks must earn their own maintenance cost; do not build elaborate test infrastructure for small or isolated needs.
+Keep tests readable and direct. Size test helpers and fixture frameworks to the maintenance benefit they provide.
 
 ## Coverage
 
-Coverage is a diagnostic, not a target.
-
-Use it to find untested critical branches and unexpectedly weak packages. Do not write low-value tests solely to increase a percentage, and do not infer test quality from coverage alone.
+Use coverage to locate untested critical branches and unexpectedly weak packages. Evaluate test quality through meaningful behavioral protection and choose coverage according to risk.
 
 Pure domain logic will often warrant higher coverage than CLI wiring or external adapters. Uneven coverage is acceptable when it reflects risk.
 
-Increasing coverage is valuable only when the newly covered behavior protects a meaningful risk at an acceptable cost.
-
 ## Regression tests
 
 A bug fix should normally include a regression test that fails before the fix and passes afterward.
 
-Retain the test when the defect could realistically recur and its consequences justify the ongoing cost. Prefer the narrowest durable test of the violated contract or invariant; do not preserve accidental implementation details from the original bug.
+Retain the test when the defect could realistically recur and its consequences justify the ongoing cost. Prefer the narrowest durable test of the violated contract or invariant.
 
-Not every historical bug requires a permanent test. If the underlying design has made recurrence impossible, the test has become redundant, or a stronger invariant test now subsumes it, remove or consolidate it.
+Remove or consolidate a test when the underlying design has made recurrence impossible, its protection is redundant, or a stronger invariant test subsumes it.
 
 ## Deleting or rewriting tests
 
-Tests are maintained code, not permanent historical artifacts.
-
-Delete or rewrite a test when its maintenance cost exceeds the confidence it provides.
+Delete or rewrite tests when maintenance cost exceeds their continuing
+protective value.
 
 Strong candidates include tests that:
 
 - require updates after harmless internal changes;
-- directly assert private constants without protecting a real contract;
-- duplicate the same policy across several layers;
+- assert incidental private constants or snapshot large amounts of incidental output;
 - verify mock choreography rather than outcomes;
-- snapshot large amounts of incidental output;
-- test trivial private helpers already exercised through stable package behavior;
-- protect risks already covered more effectively elsewhere;
+- duplicate policy across layers, retest trivial helpers covered by package
+  behavior, or protect risks covered more effectively elsewhere;
 - are flaky, misleading, obsolete, or disproportionately expensive to diagnose; or
 - no longer correspond to a plausible failure mode.
 
-Several brittle tests may encode one genuine requirement. Replace them with one durable behavior-level or invariant test rather than preserving all of them.
-
-Deleting a low-value test can improve the quality of the suite by reducing noise, maintenance burden, and friction around legitimate change.
+Several brittle tests may encode one genuine requirement. Consolidate them into one durable behavior-level or invariant test.
 
 ## Reviewing a proposed test
 
-Use the following questions when the value, boundary, or durability of a proposed test is not self-evident. Significant test additions should be reviewable against them, but written answers are not required for every routine test.
+Use the following questions when a proposed test needs closer evaluation. Significant test additions should be reviewable against them; written answers are optional for routine tests.
 
-1. What realistic defect would it catch?
-2. How likely is that defect?
-3. How consequential would it be?
-4. Is the behavior already protected elsewhere?
-5. At which layer should this behavior be owned?
-6. Does the test assert a durable contract or an incidental implementation detail?
-7. Could the implementation be refactored without changing the behavior and without editing this test?
-8. What should cause this test to fail?
-9. What legitimate changes should not cause this test to fail?
-10. What ongoing maintenance, execution, and diagnostic cost will the test impose?
-11. Is there a smaller or more direct test that protects the same risk?
-
-Do not add the test when its expected lifetime cost exceeds its expected protective value.
-
-When deciding not to test plausible behavior, record or be able to explain why the risk is low, already protected, obvious, reversible, or cheaper to detect elsewhere.
+1. Which requested behavior or established contract does it protect, and what realistic defect would violate it?
+2. How likely and consequential is that defect, and is it already protected elsewhere?
+3. What is the narrowest stable boundary that can test it clearly?
+4. Would a correct internal refactor or a change to an incidental default require test edits?
+5. Does its confidence justify its maintenance, execution, and diagnostic cost, or would a smaller test suffice?
 
 ## Definition of sufficient
 
 A test suite is sufficient when:
 
-- important contracts and invariants are protected;
-- meaningful boundaries and failure modes are exercised;
-- realistic and consequential regressions are credibly protected against silent recurrence;
-- behavior involving data integrity, destructive operations, compatibility, security, concurrency, idempotency, and recovery is credibly protected;
-- important external boundaries have realistic integration coverage;
-- representative complete workflows are tested;
-- failures provide useful signal rather than redundant noise;
-- legitimate internal changes usually do not require test edits; and
+- important requested behavior and established contracts are protected against realistic, consequential failures;
+- boundaries and component interactions have coverage where they introduce meaningful risks not protected elsewhere;
+- failures provide useful, distinct signals;
+- tests usually remain stable through legitimate internal changes; and
 - additional tests would mostly repeat existing protection or preserve inconsequential implementation details.
 
-Sufficiency is a risk judgment, not a coverage percentage or test count. Reassess it as the application, its users, and the consequences of failure evolve.
-
-The governing rule is:
-
-> Test heavily where failure is consequential, subtle, or difficult to detect after the fact. Test lightly where failure is obvious, reversible, and inexpensive—and retain no test whose lifetime cost exceeds the confidence it provides.
+Reassess sufficiency as the application, its users, and the consequences of
+failure evolve.

docs/release.md

@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ source/tag push; binary delivery runs asynchronously.
 
 ## Prerequisites
 
-Use Bash, Git, and Go 1.25.5 or newer (CI uses Go 1.25.5 or newer), with dependencies available
-locally or downloadable. Tests themselves are offline. Work from a
+Use Bash, Git, and Go 1.25.5 or newer (CI uses Go 1.25.5), with dependencies
+available locally or downloadable. Tests themselves are offline. Work from a
 checkout of `main` with permission to push that branch and tags to `origin`.
 For this repository, `origin` is `https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita.git`.
 The script uses the checkout's configured `origin`; set it correctly before use.
@@ -25,6 +25,17 @@ short summary and any compatibility or upgrade instructions relevant to the
 release. There are no mandatory boilerplate sections. Update affected canonical
 documentation with behavior changes.
 
+End each new note with these links, substituting the selected release version for
+`<version>`:
+
+```markdown
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/<version>/COPYRIGHT) | [LICENSE](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/<version>/LICENSE) | [ATTRIBUTION](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/<version>/docs/oss/attribution.md)
+```
+
+Check that all three paths exist in the candidate source. Retire completed
+roadmaps when useful during preparation, preserving planned and deferred work
+and repairing affected links. This is ordinary preparation, not a script gate.
+
 Commit the intended changes, including the note, on `main`. The release script
 requires a clean index and worktree and does not create commits. There is no
 separate approval round. Published notes describe their tagged release; existing
@@ -75,6 +86,9 @@ checks compilation, not native execution on each architecture.
 The CI job status and logs show delivery progress or failure. Assets appear on
 the matching Gitea release page when delivery succeeds. A successful tag push
 must not be reported as confirmation that these files are available.
+For a new hosted release, the release plugin uses the checked-in note at the
+tag as its body, including the footer. On delivery retries it preserves
+existing release information and skips files that already exist.
 
 Consumers can download the binary for their Linux architecture and `SHA256SUMS`
 from that page, check its listed SHA-256 digest with `sha256sum`, and make it

docs/releases/README.md

@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
 # Release Notes
 
+- [Audita v2.0.1](v2.0.1.md)
 - [Audita v2.0.0](v2.0.0.md)
 - [Audita v1.1.0](v1.1.0.md)
 
-See the [release documentation requirements](../policy/release.md#release-documentation).
+See the [release documentation requirements](../policy/release.md#release-documentation-and-preparation).
 Use the [release procedure](../release.md) to prepare and publish new releases.
 
 This index does not reconstruct or replace records for existing tags.

docs/releases/v2.0.1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# Audita v2.0.1
+
+This patch release updates the selected ConfigKit and PromptKit libraries and
+adds complete licensing and attribution information to the source tree. Release
+notes are now used as the body of new hosted releases.
+
+- ConfigKit is updated to v0.4.2 and PromptKit to v0.11.2. The selected
+  OpenRouter and Rakestrawhome catalogs are updated to v2.20260926.0.
+- The [project grant](../../COPYRIGHT) and [upstream attribution](../oss/attribution.md)
+  now identify the application's license, incorporated components, and the
+  separately licensed policy material.
+- The [release procedure](../release.md) describes the source release and
+  asynchronous Linux binary delivery. Existing release records remain intact.
+
+[COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/v2.0.1/COPYRIGHT) | [LICENSE](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/v2.0.1/LICENSE) | [ATTRIBUTION](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/v2.0.1/docs/oss/attribution.md)

docs/roadmap/decision-set-reconciliation.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 **Last updated:** 2026-09-25
 
 **Status:** Implemented. This document owns the target behavior and user intent.
-[implementation.md](implementation.md) owns concrete decisions, ordered work,
+[historical implementation plan](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/commit/91d9be68a7bb3a102900253fdfd8438f0a43f666/docs/roadmap/implementation.md) owns concrete decisions, ordered work,
 and verification.
 
 ## Purpose and User Intent
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Debug evidence distinguishes unavailable validation from editorial rejection.
 
 The schema/transport boundary remains with PromptKit; reconciliation needs no
 additional model call. Concrete helper structures, reason names, mapping changes,
-and verification steps belong in the [implementation plan](implementation.md).
+and verification steps belong in the [historical implementation plan](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/commit/91d9be68a7bb3a102900253fdfd8438f0a43f666/docs/roadmap/implementation.md).
 
 ## Scope Boundaries
 

docs/roadmap/implementation.md

@@ -1,287 +1,313 @@
-# Implementation Plan: Partial Validator Decision Sets
+# Implementation Plan: Standard Policy Alignment
 
-**Last updated:** 2026-09-25
+**Last updated:** 2026-09-28
 
-**Status:** Implemented; all stages completed.
-**Source baseline:** `60e2fe7`.
+**Status:** Complete; Stages 1–4 implemented.
 **Audience:** gpt-5.6-terra coding agent.
+**Audita planning baseline:** `91d9be68a7bb3a102900253fdfd8438f0a43f666`.
+**Selected upstream revision:** `d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843`.
 
 ## Scope and Execution
 
-Implement [partial success for validator decision sets](decision-set-reconciliation.md).
-That roadmap owns product intent and target semantics; this document selects the
-implementation and verification work. Follow Stage 1 through Stage 3 in order and
-record completion evidence beneath each stage. Each stage is a focused agent task.
+Implement the accepted [Standard Policy Alignment roadmap](policy.md). It owns
+the intended end state and reasons for local variations; this plan owns ordered
+implementation and verification. Complete Stage 1 through Stage 4 in order, each
+as one focused agent task. Record completion evidence under each stage and commit
+completed units with short, plain English messages under the agent policy.
 
-Read [development guidance](../development.md) and all policies under
-[docs/policy](../policy/): [agents](../policy/agents.md),
-[architecture](../policy/architecture.md), [documentation](../policy/documentation.md),
-[testing](../policy/testing.md), and [release](../policy/release.md). Use graph-first
-code discovery, preserve unrelated work, and commit completed coherent units with
-plain English messages. Do not introduce approval rounds between stages.
+Begin with [development guidance](../development.md) and the
+[agent policy](../policy/agents.md). Read the policies governing each stage;
+reuse unchanged policy context. For policy edits, read that policy and affected
+cross-references. Follow the adopted selective reading guide once installed.
+Use graph-first discovery for application code; document and shell/configuration
+inspection does not need a graph lookup.
 
-Aim directly at the final implementation. No temporary modes, compatibility shims,
-new configuration, extra model calls, or upstream dependency work is required.
-Keep PromptKit structural validation/repair and the runner's internal cardinality
-checks. Implement the agreed outcomes, not extra restrictions suggested by existing
-tests or incidental internal structure. Internal helper signatures and layout can
-be adjusted idiomatically while preserving the decisions below.
+Use the public upstream repository at
+`https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy` and check out the exact revision above
+in a temporary directory outside Audita. Verify its full commit before copying.
+Read its `docs/adoption.md`, relevant `docs/policy/` files, `COPYRIGHT`, and
+referenced assets. Do not replace the selected revision with current main or
+reconstruct prior adoption baselines. The public repository and its attribution
+are now explicitly approved.
 
-This replaces the completed span-deletion plan, available in Git at
-`60e2fe7:docs/roadmap/implementation.md`. It does not reopen that feature. The final
-stage includes correcting historical links that otherwise point to this new plan.
-No release preparation, tag, push, CI wait, or paid-provider evaluation is included.
+This plan replaces the completed decision-set plan, preserved at
+[the planning baseline](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/commit/91d9be68a7bb3a102900253fdfd8438f0a43f666/docs/roadmap/implementation.md).
+Repair historical roadmap references in Stage 4; do not reopen those features.
 
-## Selected Implementation Decisions
+Implement directly toward the final state. Intermediate commits need no temporary
+policy files, compatibility machinery, or complete dependency inventory. Keep
+partial work truthful and finish cross-document consistency by Stage 4. Do not
+release, tag, push, rewrite published material, change dependency versions, or
+refactor application code as part of this work. No extra approval round is needed
+between stages. If factual verification uncovers a concrete unresolved rights or
+publication issue, report it rather than inventing an obligation or claiming it
+resolved.
 
-### Reconciliation boundary
+## Common Adoption Decisions
 
-Keep reconciliation in `internal/framework/validators`, after successful structured
-completion and before converting the batch into runner-facing results. Replace
-`mapLLMResponseToDecisions` with a small pure reconciliation helper; use an ordinary
-private result struct containing:
+- Start each policy from the selected upstream file. Preserve shared substantive
+  wording verbatim. Remove its `Base Policy Template` section after fulfilling
+  the instructions; include only the project customizations selected below.
+- Retain the upstream base version and set `Last Updated` to the actual adoption
+  date. Add `**Upstream Source:**` with a Markdown link to that same file at the
+  full selected commit, using the URL prefix
+  `https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/`.
+  Do not claim this was the source of old local documents.
+- Keep discovery URLs in `meta.md` pointed to the public repository and
+  `/src/branch/main/docs/adoption.md`. Pin example links in the adopted OSS policy
+  to this selected commit, after checking their paths. Preserve examples upstream.
+- Explain substantive local variations briefly where they apply. No separate
+  exception register, synchronization system, policy snapshot tests, or legal
+  approval workflow is needed.
+- Keep policy credit in the single canonical attribution entry. Describe only
+  material adopted so far, expanding it as later stages copy more material.
+  Metadata and template removal mean an adopted file can truthfully be described
+  as adapted even when its substantive rules are verbatim.
+- Ordinary link/text review is sufficient for documentation changes. Do not run
+  application tests simply because a policy document changed. Each stage ends
+  with `git diff --check` and review of its staged diff before committing.
 
-- `Decisions []Decision`: one outcome per requested item, in request order;
-- `UnavailableIndices []int`: requested indices without a usable verdict;
-- `IgnoredIndices []int`: unexpected indices encountered in response order, including
-  repeated unexpected entries, for debug attribution.
+## Stage 1 — Establish Provenance and Shared Agent/Testing Policies
 
-No generic reconciliation framework or new shared abstraction is needed. Requested
-identities come from `batch.Items`, not transcript segment IDs, the whole section,
-or any other batch. Expected input identities remain an Audita internal contract.
+**Completed:** 2026-09-28. Adopted meta 1.0, agents 1.3, and testing 1.3 from
+the verified upstream commit, preserving Audita's graph-first discovery rule.
+The initial attribution and scoped copyright notice identify only these three
+adapted policies; the CC-BY-SA text matches upstream byte-for-byte. Substantive
+policy text, pinned source paths, local links, and `git diff --check` were checked.
 
-First collect response entries by requested index and count occurrences, separating
-unexpected indices. Then walk requested items once to construct outcomes. This
-avoids accepting an early duplicate before seeing a conflicting later entry.
+**Files:** `docs/policy/meta.md`, `docs/policy/agents.md`,
+`docs/policy/testing.md`, `docs/oss/attribution.md`,
+`docs/oss/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt`, and `COPYRIGHT`.
 
-Use these candidate-level reason codes in `validators/models.go`:
+1. Adopt meta 1.0, agents 1.3, and testing 1.3 with the common metadata and
+   template-removal rules. Preserve the existing Codebase Discovery section as
+   the one local addition to agents: Audita deliberately uses graph-first
+   discovery. Adopt the remaining agent rules and the testing rules verbatim.
+2. Create attribution with `# Open Source Attribution Notices`, followed directly
+   by the canonical entry from `examples/licensing/policy-attribution.md`.
+   Substitute the selected commit in its COPYRIGHT, LICENSE, and Source URLs.
+   Initially identify the three newly adapted policy files in its `Material:`
+   sentence. Do not claim the remaining files have already been updated.
+3. Copy the selected revision's `docs/oss/licenses/CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt` byte-for-byte.
+   Keep the supplied upstream copyright and links to its grant/disclaimer.
+4. Add the adoption guide's scoped CC-BY-SA notice to Audita's `COPYRIGHT`, with
+   affected material identified through attribution. Preserve Audita's name,
+   copyright, GPL-3.0-or-later application grant, warranty statement, and third-party
+   statement. Leave the root GPLv3 `LICENSE` unchanged.
+5. Keep metadata local and truthful. `meta.md` points to the local attribution
+   and developer guide even though selective reading guidance is added next.
 
-| Condition | Internal outcome/reason |
-| --- | --- |
-| Missing requested entry | `DispositionUnavailable`, `missing_validation_decision` |
-| More than one entry for a requested index | `DispositionUnavailable`, `duplicate_validation_decision` |
-| Single requested entry failing the existing confidence range check | `DispositionUnavailable`, `invalid_validation_decision` |
-| Single usable entry | Existing approved or `llm_rejected` decision with its model reason. |
+**Validation and completion:** Compare the substantive agent/testing text directly
+with the selected upstream documents, allowing only template removal, metadata,
+and the identified discovery addition. Verify each new source link's exact file
+and revision, local attribution links, copied license bytes, and narrow grant
+scope. No application test or publication is required.
 
-Unavailable outcomes have `Approved: false` and fixed safe explanatory messages.
-Duplicate classification takes precedence over inspecting individual duplicate
-values; identical duplicates follow the same rule. Unexpected entries are ignored
-before inspecting confidence. Retain the existing confidence check as a local
-check for decoded callers/test doubles, scoped to that candidate; do not broaden
-this into structural salvage, confidence thresholds, or new semantic validation.
-The production JSON Schema still rejects out-of-range confidence before mapping.
+## Stage 2 — Customize Remaining Policies and Install Selective Orientation
 
-An empty response list makes every requested item unavailable. Response ordering
-must not change verdicts or which candidate is affected. Preserve the existing
-handling of valid negative decisions, including reason text. No candidate may
-advance merely because another candidate was approved.
+**Completed:** 2026-09-28. Adopted architecture 1.3, documentation 1.11,
+release 1.4, and OSS 1.8 with the selected Audita variations. Installed the
+upstream root orientation and verbatim Policy Reading Guide, expanded the
+scoped attribution, and repaired the release documentation heading link.
+Checked versions, provenance and example destinations, local links, policy
+differences, and `git diff --check`.
 
-### Operation accounting and ordinary reports
+**Files:** `docs/policy/architecture.md`, `docs/policy/documentation.md`,
+`docs/policy/release.md`, `docs/policy/oss.md`, `AGENTS.md`,
+`docs/development.md`, `docs/oss/attribution.md`, and `COPYRIGHT` as needed for
+accurate copied-guidance scope.
 
-Each actual validation batch remains one `outcomes.Operation`. Use existing
-`ReasonValidationDecisionsInvalid` (`validation_decisions_invalid`) for a batch
-with unavailable requested candidates. Set `Succeeded: false`, set `ProposalIndices`
-to only those unavailable indices, retain execution counts, and leave recovery
-reasons empty. Still return usable decisions from that batch alongside explicit
-unavailable outcomes, with no Go error for the reconciled model defect.
+1. Adopt architecture 1.3. Retain the upstream general Purpose And Ownership,
+   Architectural Approach, and Adopted Constraints And Implemented Structure
+   guidance. Replace Application-Specific Topics with Audita's established
+   purpose, ownership/dependency boundaries, correction/concurrency rules,
+   recovery, state/compatibility, secret handling, and selected library ownership.
+   Reuse existing local decisions; avoid duplicating general upstream prose.
+   Replace example threat discussion with the existing secret/input boundaries
+   and canonical links where useful. Do not infer new threat exclusions,
+   filesystem guarantees, interfaces, or package restructuring from the template.
+2. Adopt documentation 1.11. Keep applicable upstream ownership rows verbatim;
+   omit public HTTP and public Go API rows. Add the existing concrete ownership
+   of `docs/integrations/output-files.md` and contributor change recipes, and
+   retain the deliberate retirement of standalone troubleshooting documentation.
+   Account for the retained agent discovery/commit responsibilities in its owner
+   row. Keep reading triggers in development guidance, not a second policy table.
+3. Adopt release 1.4. Retain upstream completion, validation, guard, immutability,
+   recovery, and preparation language. Preserve the existing Supported Platforms
+   table and unsupported-platform statement as Audita's support commitment.
+   Replace the upstream discretionary human-gate paragraph with Audita's selected
+   rule against manual approvals, sign-offs, and routine confirmations as release
+   gates. Remove the obsolete list describing now-shared upstream rules as local
+   deviations. Keep concrete atomic-push mechanics in the runbook.
+4. Adopt OSS 1.8. Add a concise Audita context paragraph identifying the existing
+   GPL-3.0-or-later grant and linking to COPYRIGHT and the release procedure for
+   Gitea distribution. Use the upstream House Format and interpretation language
+   verbatim. Pin application/library COPYRIGHT and attribution examples to the
+   selected upstream commit; remove template-only setup text. No license change
+   to application code or blanket dependency compatibility claim is authorized.
+5. Replace root orientation with upstream `agents/AGENTS.md` wording while
+   retaining any existing applicable repository instructions. Keep detailed
+   discovery rules in their current agent-policy owner rather than duplicating
+   them in a newly created block.
+6. Insert the adoption guide's Policy Reading Guide and accompanying reading rules
+   into `docs/development.md` verbatim. Remove the blanket architecture-reading
+   instruction; preserve contributor commands and component-specific task rows.
+   Adjust cross-links that would otherwise contradict selective reading.
+7. Expand the single policy attribution entry to identify all `docs/policy/`
+   documents, adapted root orientation, and the copied Policy Reading Guide in
+   `docs/development.md`. Scope the COPYRIGHT CC-BY-SA notice to those materials,
+   not unrelated contributor prose or application documentation. Keep the material
+   sentence factual and concise; retain the pinned upstream credit links.
+8. Find and repair local links to policy headings renamed by adoption, including
+   the release correction heading. Do not edit published historical release
+   notes to retrofit new headings or licensing conventions.
 
-If no requested candidates are unavailable, set `Succeeded: true`. Add
-`outcomes.RecoveryValidationDecisionsFiltered` with serialized value
-`validation_decisions_filtered` when extras were ignored. Merge it with actual
-`output_repaired` and `service_recovered` reasons in the same recovery operation.
-Valid negative decisions do not prevent operation success. A clean response creates
-no new recovery reason.
+**Validation and completion:** Compare all seven policies to the pinned source;
+review every substantive difference against the roadmap's justified variations.
+Check versions (1.3, 1.3, 1.11, 1.3, 1.4, 1.0, 1.8 for agents, architecture,
+documentation, testing, release, meta, OSS respectively), file-specific source
+links, removed template sections, example destinations, ownership consistency,
+and selective reading. Temporary pending release/attribution implementation is
+completed by the following stages; do not create scaffolding for it.
 
-When unavailable candidates and extras coexist, record the failed operation only;
-keep ignored-entry evidence in debug. Do not create both an error and a recovery
-for that operation. Successful survivors must continue even though the operation
-itself records a failure. Retain actual execution counts on all paths.
+## Stage 3 — Complete Component Attribution and README Navigation
 
-Reuse existing ordinary YAML structures and version 1. The only new public report
-value is the decision-specific recovery reason; affected error indices already fit
-`Failure.ProposalIndices`. Do not add ignored entries to `Operation.Filtered` or
-`filtered_proposals`, which describe correction proposals, and do not increment
-`proposal_responses_with_filtering`. The recovery reason and existing operation
-identity suffice for ordinary reporting; detailed extra indices belong in debug.
+**Completed:** 2026-09-28. Both CGO-disabled Linux target dependency lists
+selected the same eight production modules. Inspected their selected source
+notices and copied assets, excluded test-only dependencies, and resolved the
+Go 1.25.5 source tag and its four incorporated vendored modules. Added 14
+House Format entries including policy provenance, complete applicable license
+texts, and the README footer. Checked 33 pinned source and notice destinations,
+license bytes, local links, entry shape, and `git diff --check`.
 
-Update `processreport.safeMessage` for `validation_decisions_invalid` to explain
-that some required decisions were unavailable without claiming all batch decisions
-were discarded. Generalize the recovery message to include response filtering,
-rather than only proposal filtering. Exact prose is not a test contract. Preserve
-work-unit error grouping, operation counts, and existing YAML/Markdown/CLI totals.
+**Files:** `docs/oss/attribution.md`, applicable texts under
+`docs/oss/licenses/`, and `README.md`. Add factual exception treatment to the OSS
+policy only if the actual inventory uncovers a concrete need.
 
-### Debug evidence and runner records
+1. Inventory actual incorporated material using the selected modules, production
+   package dependencies for both Linux targets, source/assets, and shipped Go
+   runtime. Use `go list -deps` for `./cmd/audita` with `CGO_ENABLED=0` and each
+   target architecture, plus source inspection for copied material. Inspect test
+   dependencies where relevant to included material; a go.mod entry or tool use
+   alone is not sufficient reason for attribution. Do not change go.mod/go.sum.
+2. At the planning baseline, production dependencies include ConfigKit v0.4.1,
+   PromptKit v0.11.1, both catalogs v2.20260926.0, jsonschema/v6 v6.0.2,
+   yaml/v4 v4.0.0-rc.6, x/text v0.14.0, and yaml.v3 v3.0.1. Start with the four
+   verified source commits recorded in the feature roadmap; resolve remaining
+   module versions to exact source commits and inspect their COPYRIGHT, LICENSE,
+   NOTICE, PATENTS, and relevant bundled material as applicable. Account for
+   additional material discovered in that inspection rather than treating this
+   starting list as an exhaustive guarantee.
+3. For the Go runtime, use the release build's configured Go 1.25.5 source tag
+   and resolve it to its full source commit. Do not silently substitute the
+   inspecting agent's installed toolchain (Go 1.26.8 during planning). Preserve
+   actual runtime/standard-library notices, including relevant bundled third-party
+   material. Document maintenance of this entry when the distributed toolchain
+   changes; do not pin new toolchain behavior or reject other supported local Go
+   versions merely to simplify attribution.
+4. Add entries following OSS 1.8 exactly, with selected module/version or material
+   scope where useful. Preserve supplied copyrights and accurate license
+   expressions; use the prescribed link labels and `[Source](COMMIT_URL).`
+   spelling. Keep policy attribution first. Order other entries consistently by
+   project name; ordering is presentation, not a new public contract.
+5. Copy applicable complete standard texts from verified sources, using the
+   pinned reference collection where applicable. Share identical standard texts
+   and include required companions (LGPLv3 and GPLv3 for the two libraries).
+   Include upstream commit links when a file contains project-specific material
+   in addition to standard wording. Preserve existing incorporated notices.
+6. Apply the adopted house interpretation for project-specific notice links.
+   Put concrete exception reasoning in OSS policy or an appropriate decision
+   record, never in attribution. Do not add missing-copyright filler, research
+   narratives, inferred licensing choices, or legal conclusions to entries.
+7. End README with the two OSS statements, identifying Audita as GPL v3.0 or later
+   and linking to `COPYRIGHT` and `docs/oss/attribution.md`. The linked grant owns
+   the separately licensed policy scope; no duplicated notice list is needed.
 
-Existing interaction diagnostics already retain the full decoded response and final
-content. Add the reconciliation result to the response diagnostic payload for a
-successfully decoded validation response. Perform reconciliation before writing
-that diagnostic; retain existing call-error diagnostics and diagnostic-write failure
-handling. All reconciled decisions, including unavailable outcomes, receive the
-returned response artifact path. This records unexpected indices and duplicates
-without inventing candidate ledger entries or an additional debug file.
+**Validation and completion:** Inspect entries against selected source evidence,
+resolve every source/notice commit and path, compare standard license bytes, and
+check local links. Confirm that actual distributed material is accounted for
+without blindly including dependency graph or development-tool entries. Record
+concise inventory/check evidence under this stage; no new SBOM, scanner, durable
+inventory generator, or test suite is required.
 
-Carry `validators.DecisionDisposition` through `runner.ValidatorDecisionRecord`
-and `runner.ValidatorRejectedChange` in an additive `disposition` field. Populate
-it from each actual `Decision`, including partial decision evidence returned on
-fatal paths. Keep the existing collection names and application flow; no parallel
-unavailable-candidate collection is necessary.
+## Stage 4 — Integrate Release Notes and Finish Cross-Document Validation
 
-In `processreport`, add `disposition` to `LedgerValidatorDecisionRecord` and map
-unavailable candidates to a top-level ledger disposition `unavailable`, instead
-of `rejected`. Ordinary editorial/deterministic rejections remain `rejected`.
-Use the explicit disposition, not a reason-code allowlist, so existing timeout,
-provider-failure, and oversized-input outcomes retain the same distinction too.
-Update affected test fixtures to supply dispositions where they represent real
-validator outputs. Do not invent a fatal check or compatibility subsystem for a
-zero-value disposition in handcrafted fixtures.
+**Completed:** 2026-09-28. Wired the checked-in release note into the hosted
+release plugin, documented immutable-tag notice links and release preparation,
+repaired the specified historical roadmap references, and marked the feature
+roadmap implemented. Parsed the YAML, substituted `v2.0.0` to a tracked note,
+checked non-overwrite settings and candidate footer paths, reviewed all seven
+policies against the pinned source, and checked repository-local Markdown links
+and `git diff --check`. Hosted execution awaits the next real release.
 
-Retain candidate identity, literal proposed replacements (including explicit empty
-strings), and omission of applied replacements for unapplied candidates. Existing
-fatal/interrupted/module-failure handling and debug-off behavior remain. Supplied
-model decisions remain visible in interaction evidence even when reconciliation
-cannot accept them as authoritative verdicts.
+**Files:** `.woodpecker/release.yml`, `docs/release.md`, affected documentation
+links, `docs/roadmap/policy.md`, and this plan. Repair the historical references
+specified below; do not retire unrelated roadmaps in this sprint.
 
-## Stage 1 — Reconcile Model Decisions and Preserve Valid Work
+1. Add this setting to the existing `publish-release` step:
 
-**Completed:** 2026-09-25. Reconciliation preserves usable decisions, attributes
-unavailable requested indices and ignored extras, and keeps strict runner
-cardinality. Validator and runner boundary checks passed with
-`go test ./internal/framework/validators ./internal/framework/runner`.
+   ```yaml
+   note: docs/releases/${CI_COMMIT_TAG}.md
+   ```
 
-**Work**
+   The [official release-plugin documentation](https://woodpecker-ci.org/plugins/release)
+   supports a file path in `note`; the
+   [environment reference](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/usage/environment)
+   makes `CI_COMMIT_TAG` available for configuration substitution. These interfaces
+   were checked during planning. Use the checked-out tagged note directly; no
+   generator, custom publisher, or additional dependency is needed. Preserve
+   `overwrite: false`, `file-exists: skip`, existing assets/checksum settings,
+   secret reference, image, and step dependency.
+2. In `docs/release.md`, add the footer preparation instruction with this pattern
+   (substitute the selected release version for `<version>`):
 
-1. Read the validator models, `llm_validators.go`, existing partial-batch tests,
-   `outcomes/outcomes.go`, and `runner.validateSectionCandidates`.
-2. Implement the reconciliation result/helper and candidate reason codes selected
-   above. Replace the whole-batch mapping-error branch with outcome construction
-   and correct batch accounting. Add the decision-specific recovery constant.
-3. Move successful-response diagnostic assembly after reconciliation and include
-   its result. Preserve raw/decoded response evidence and diagnostic paths; keep
-   recoverable call errors, fatal errors, and cancellation on their existing paths.
-4. Keep `EnforceDecisionCardinality` and `EnforcePartialDecisionCardinality` strict.
-   Ensure final validator decisions are complete and unique internally. The runner
-   should continue passing only approved candidates onward without treating an
-   operation's failure metadata as a reason to discard valid decisions.
-5. Replace obsolete batch-rejection expectations in `llm_validators_test.go` and
-   relevant runner tests. Preserve cardinality tests that exercise broken internal
-   validators. Update the repaired-but-domain-invalid tests so actual unavailable
-   cases remain errors with counts retained and no recovery record.
+   ```markdown
+   [COPYRIGHT](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/<version>/COPYRIGHT) | [LICENSE](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/<version>/LICENSE) | [ATTRIBUTION](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/tag/<version>/docs/oss/attribution.md)
+   ```
 
-**Focused verification**
+   Explain that the plugin uses the checked-in note for new hosted releases and
+   preserves existing release information on retries. Keep old notes and pages
+   intact. Validate intended paths locally during preparation; do not add remote
+   footer checks, a footer parser, or a new release-script gate.
+3. Align the runbook with the adopted policy: retain `origin`, `main`, atomic
+   source/tag publication, one offline validation pass, required Linux builds,
+   optional check mode, and asynchronous immutable delivery retries. Reference
+   the policy for requirements rather than introducing additional ones. Add
+   proportionate completed-roadmap retirement guidance for future release
+   preparation without making it a script-enforced condition. No release script
+   change is expected from this adoption.
+4. Repair both current-plan links in `decision-set-reconciliation.md` to the
+   historical plan at the full Audita planning baseline listed above. Remove
+   the stale sentence in `library-adoption.md` saying the current implementation
+   plan covers span deletion. Preserve historical records and deferred work.
+5. Review the final adoption diff against upstream and the feature roadmap.
+   Check all policy source metadata, template removal, local exception reasons,
+   copied-material scope, license text fidelity, local links/anchors, and pinned
+   upstream destinations. Ensure the feature roadmap records implemented status
+   only after its accepted outcomes are achieved.
+6. Parse/review the affected YAML using an available YAML parser or Woodpecker
+   linter. Substitute a representative existing release tag locally and confirm
+   the note path resolves to the tracked note; old notes need not have the new
+   footer. Check a temporary example of the new footer against candidate paths.
+   Verify non-overwriting publication settings remain unchanged. Do not call the
+   forge to create a test release, run a plugin with production credentials, or
+   wait for CI. Static configuration and documented plugin-interface validation
+   are sufficient for this wiring change; report that hosted execution awaits
+   the next real release rather than claiming it was exercised.
 
-Use a small table at the validator boundary for mixed missing/extra indices,
-conflicting and identical requested duplicates, extra-only responses, empty lists,
-reordered responses, and a single invalid-confidence decoded test-double entry.
-Include noncontiguous expected indices and valid negative decisions. Assert semantic
-outcomes and affected indices, not helper layout or exact messages. Include one
-controlled case combining successful structural/service recovery facts with ignored
-extras and one failed reconciliation retaining counts without recovery reasons.
-
-At the runner boundary, use the real LLM-backed validator with a controlled client
-and a later validator: prove a survivor reaches later required validation, a later
-rejection prevents application, and unavailable candidates never reach that later
-validator as approved. Use successful proposal operation facts where accounting is
-asserted; do not check an empty operation list. Reuse existing fixtures/tests rather
-than creating a second framework or duplicating every table case.
-
-Run `go test ./internal/framework/validators ./internal/framework/runner`.
-
-**End state:** Usable decisions survive model indexing defects, strict internal
-cardinality remains satisfied, and operation facts explain partial failure or
-successful extra filtering. No extra model generation is introduced.
-
-## Stage 2 — Carry Dispositions Through Debug and Report Partial Outcomes
-
-**Completed:** 2026-09-25. Runner and ledger records carry explicit
-dispositions; ordinary reports distinguish unavailable decision errors from
-extra-index filtering recoveries. Focused report, ledger, runner, and YAML
-checks passed with `go test ./internal/framework/runner
-./internal/framework/processreport ./internal/core/reporting`.
-
-**Work**
-
-1. Add and populate disposition fields through the runner and ledger as selected
-   above. Map unavailable candidates distinctly and preserve empty replacement
-   serialization. Check both normal and fatal partial-evidence paths.
-2. Update `processreport` messages and review `Build`, `mapFailure`, and `mapRecovery`.
-   Reuse their existing aggregation; change only assumptions that would misreport
-   the new operation facts. Core YAML structures and Markdown table layout remain.
-3. Extend existing report/ledger tests for an operation with surviving work plus
-   unavailable indices, extra-only recovery, and a mixed defect operation. Verify
-   error indices exclude survivors, extra filtering does not count as proposal
-   filtering, and failed operations do not also generate recovery records.
-4. Verify debug ledger entries distinguish genuine rejection from unavailability,
-   and interaction diagnostics preserve ignored entries and reconciliation reasons.
-   Unknown response indices must not create fake ledger candidates. Retain existing
-   redaction and optional-debug-failure tests rather than reproducing them all.
-5. Update `docs/integrations/output-files.md` for the new recovery reason and debug
-   disposition, and `docs/internal/diagnostics-reporting.md` for the mapping changes.
-   Explain that validation failure indices identify unavailable candidates, not
-   necessarily every candidate submitted to that batch.
-
-**Validation**
-
-Run `go test ./internal/framework/runner ./internal/framework/processreport ./internal/core/reporting`.
-Use semantic YAML/summary assertions; no whole-report prose golden, exact message
-snapshot, new schema version, or new rendering mode is needed.
-
-**End state:** Reports and debug evidence accurately describe partial validation
-success and handled extras through existing reporting mechanisms.
-
-## Stage 3 — Verify the Assembled Workflow and Finalize Documentation
-
-**Completed:** 2026-09-25. Controlled subprocess runs covered a mixed decision
-response and an extra-only response through the CLI, transcript, YAML, Markdown,
-debug ledger, and interaction evidence. Fixture execution facts showed one
-provider attempt and zero structural repairs per logical call. `go test
-./cmd/audita` and `go test ./...` passed. Canonical validator guidance and
-roadmap status were updated; the two span-deletion plan links now target the
-historical plan at `60e2fe7`.
-
-**Work**
-
-1. Extend the existing local-provider subprocess fixtures in
-   `cmd/audita/main_integration_test.go`. Add a representative mixed-decision run
-   with an applied survivor, a legitimate rejection, a missing requested decision,
-   a duplicate requested decision, and an extra index. Return responses by the
-   requested correction identities; do not freeze incidental validator call order.
-   Ensure the survivor passes all remaining required validation. Assert successful
-   CLI completion, correct transcript, one work-unit error with only unavailable
-   indices, no reconciliation recovery for the failed operation, and debug
-   evidence distinguishing rejection/unavailability without unknown candidates.
-2. Add or adapt a compact extra-only case proving usable work survives and one
-   `validation_decisions_filtered` recovery appears. Verify YAML, Markdown, and CLI
-   agree on totals using semantic assertions. Keep proposal-filtering counts separate.
-   Existing reporting-disable/debug selection tests remain the owners of those options.
-3. In these fixtures give PromptKit its normal configured structural repair allowance,
-   but supply schema-valid responses. Verify reconciliation adds no generations or
-   structural repairs using fixture requests/execution facts, without encoding today's
-   total validator count as a permanent contract. Keep structural-malformation tests
-   and recoverable batch-failure tests; do not relax the schema to make fixtures pass.
-4. Update `docs/internal/validators.md` and any affected canonical descriptions found
-   by searching for whole-batch rejection claims. Explain tolerant external response
-   reconciliation versus strict internal cardinality. The structural-validation
-   boundary remains explicit, and guided recovery remains deferred in `future.md`.
-5. Mark the feature roadmap implemented only after the assembled checks pass, and
-   record actual completion evidence in this plan. Repair the two span-deletion
-   roadmap links to the old plan with the historical URL
-   `https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/commit/60e2fe7/docs/roadmap/implementation.md`.
-   Preserve historical release notes and unrelated roadmaps.
-
-**Validation**
-
-Run `go test ./cmd/audita` while developing the fixture, then `go test ./...` once
-for the completed implementation. Run `git diff --check` and verify affected
-Markdown links. Do not add live-provider checks, a platform matrix, repeated full
-suite runs, or release gates solely for this feature. No code is implemented by
-this planning pass; these commands are instructions for the implementation sprint.
-
-**End state:** The accepted partial-success behavior is exercised through the real
-CLI/library boundary, canonical documentation matches it, and coherent changes
-are committed for subsequent release consideration.
+**Validation and completion:** Run `git diff --check`, review staged content and
+all affected links, and record the final verification evidence. No full Go suite
+or build matrix is required when only documents and the note setting changed.
+If an actual release-script behavior change becomes necessary, justify its
+scope and run focused `go test ./scripts` coverage for that behavior rather than
+inventing additional release gates. Commit the completed work; leave a clean
+workspace without publishing.
 
 ## Open Questions
 
-None required before implementation. The implementation decisions above preserve
-the agreed product scope. General structural salvage and guided regeneration remain
-separate future decisions, not unresolved prerequisites for this work.
+None requiring a policy or design decision before implementation. The upstream
+revision, local exceptions, attribution arrangement, target documents, and
+release-body mechanism are selected. Exact component notice details and source
+revisions are factual verification work in Stage 3, not permission gates. If
+that inspection reveals an uncovered obligation, follow the adopted exception
+procedure and identify the concrete decision instead of silently expanding scope.

docs/roadmap/library-adoption.md

@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 # Coordinated ConfigKit and PromptKit Adoption
 
-**Last updated:** 2026-09-24
+**Last updated:** 2026-09-28
 
-**Status:** Production implementation complete. ConfigKit v0.4.0 and PromptKit
-v0.11.0 are adopted; [historical implementation evidence](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/commit/cb405f6/docs/roadmap/implementation.md) records the
-completed checks. The current `implementation.md` covers span deletion instead.
-Release compliance and publication remain separate work.
+**Status:** Production implementation complete. ConfigKit v0.4.2 and PromptKit
+v0.11.2 are adopted; [historical implementation evidence](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita/src/commit/cb405f6/docs/roadmap/implementation.md) records the
+completed checks. Release compliance and publication remain separate work.
 
 ## Goal and Ownership
 
@@ -23,7 +22,7 @@ Audita's transcript-correction capabilities and domain protections.
 The [configuration roadmap](configkit.md) owns configuration and inspection policy.
 The [boundary findings](library-boundary-findings.md) own the selected defaults,
 full migration inventory, failure mapping, and prototype evidence. The selected
-production versions are ConfigKit v0.4.0 and PromptKit v0.11.0, with Go 1.25.5 as
+production versions are ConfigKit v0.4.2 and PromptKit v0.11.2, with Go 1.25.5 as
 the minimum. Use published modules, never sibling checkouts or local replacements.
 The existing YAML dependency remains while glossary parsing needs it.
 

docs/roadmap/policy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+# Standard Policy Alignment
+
+**Last updated:** 2026-09-28
+
+**Status:** Implemented. This roadmap replaces its earlier licensing-only scope
+and records the accepted end state. [implementation.md](implementation.md)
+records the ordered work and verification; the adopted policies are in
+`docs/policy/`.
+
+## Purpose and Review Revision
+
+Align Audita with [Standard Repository Policies](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy),
+using identical policy language except where a substantive, locally significant
+requirement or decision justifies a variation. Adopt upstream wording verbatim
+for non-substantive differences. Perform the required template customizations
+without inventing application contracts, restrictions, or guarantees.
+
+The accepted review compared Audita's current documents directly against upstream
+commit **`d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843`**, beginning with the
+[adoption and update guide at that revision](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/adoption.md).
+Use that revision for this adoption. Historical adoption baselines need not be
+reconstructed or assessed. A later upstream revision requires deliberate review,
+not an automatic substitution during implementation.
+
+The public upstream repository, discovery links, and copied-policy attribution
+are part of the accepted direction. This supersedes the earlier instruction to
+omit references to the policy repository.
+
+## Current Baseline
+
+- Audita has five adopted policies: agents 1.0, architecture 1.0, documentation
+  1.1, testing 1.0, and release 1.0. None has per-document `Upstream Source`
+  metadata. `meta.md` and `oss.md` are absent.
+- [AGENTS.md](../../AGENTS.md) routes readers to the contributor guide and agent
+  policy. [docs/development.md](../development.md) has component-specific reading
+  guidance, but lacks the upstream selective Policy Reading Guide and currently
+  directs all tasks to the architecture policy.
+- [COPYRIGHT](../../COPYRIGHT) and [LICENSE](../../LICENSE) already establish
+  Audita's GPL-3.0-or-later application grant and full GPLv3 text. The grant does
+  not yet identify the scope of separately licensed copied policy documents.
+- There is no canonical `docs/oss/attribution.md` or local dependency license-text
+  collection. Relevant component notices still require an evidence-based inventory.
+- The [README](../../README.md) lacks the prescribed final licensing statements.
+  The [release procedure](../release.md) lacks licensing-footer instructions, and
+  the [release workflow](../../.woodpecker/release.yml) does not explicitly reuse
+  checked-in release notes as hosted release bodies.
+- Audita already releases through one publication command with an atomic source
+  and tag push. Linux amd64 and arm64 are required; macOS arm64 is best-effort
+  development support. Successful publication completes the release without
+  waiting for CI or artifact delivery.
+
+## Targeted Policy Set and Justified Customizations
+
+All seven policy files belong under `docs/policy/`. The versions below are those
+at the selected upstream revision. No existing policy is wholly unchanged;
+existing architectural decisions and platform commitments need no substantive
+revision merely to align the text.
+
+| Policy | Target version | Required alignment and justified local treatment |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| `agents.md` | 1.3 | Adopt upstream substantive language verbatim. Retain Audita's graph-first Codebase Discovery section because it is an explicitly selected repository workflow. |
+| `architecture.md` | 1.3 | Adopt general ownership, boundary, and constraint guidance, then perform the template's required application-specific customization. Preserve Audita's ordered pipeline, ConfigKit/PromptKit responsibilities, deterministic processing, recovery, concurrency, and secret-handling decisions. These describe real project requirements rather than stylistic preferences. |
+| `documentation.md` | 1.11 | Adopt upstream prose and applicable ownership rows. Retain concrete output-contract ownership, contributor change recipes, and the decision to place operating/recovery guidance in operations instead of restoring troubleshooting documentation. Omit HTTP API and public Go API ownership rows because Audita has neither responsibility. |
+| `testing.md` | 1.3 | Adopt substantive text verbatim. Its distinction between established contracts and invented test requirements needs no local exception. |
+| `release.md` | 1.4 | Adopt upstream substantive language. Preserve Linux amd64/arm64 requirements, best-effort macOS arm64, unsupported Windows/macOS amd64, and Audita's explicit decision against human release gates. These are selected support and workflow commitments. |
+| `meta.md` | 1.0 | Adopt provenance, local authority, and public discovery guidance with accurate metadata and local attribution navigation. No additional substantive exception is needed. |
+| `oss.md` | 1.8 | Adopt the House Format and maintenance rules, with required project-specific facts and reference links. Preserve Audita's GPL-3.0-or-later application grant, Gitea host, and existing distribution channels. |
+
+Remove each `Base Policy Template` section after carrying out its instructions.
+Keep local customizations identifiable and explain their project-specific reason
+in the appropriate policy; do not maintain alternate paraphrases of shared rules.
+Architecture customization does not authorize a package redesign or additional
+threat-model guarantees. Supporting documents are warranted by existing
+responsibilities and substantive content, not by unused template examples.
+
+Successful-tag-push completion, asynchronous artifacts, minimal automated gates,
+and proportionate validation are now shared upstream rules. Replace Audita's
+parallel explanations with the upstream language rather than describing these
+as continuing exceptions. Keep concrete commands, remotes, build targets, and
+publication mechanics in the release procedure with appropriate policy links.
+
+## Provenance and Selective Reading
+
+For every adopted policy, retain the selected upstream `Base Policy Version`,
+set `Last Updated` to its actual local adoption date, and introduce `Upstream
+Source` linking to that exact file at the selected full commit. The URL pattern is:
+
+```text
+https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/<filename>.md
+```
+
+Substitute each of `agents`, `architecture`, `documentation`, `testing`, `release`,
+`meta`, and `oss`; a repository-root or shared generic source link is insufficient.
+These links describe the source actually incorporated, not a reconstructed claim
+about older local documents. Git and per-document metadata are sufficient; no
+separate synchronization registry or recurring check is required.
+
+In `meta.md`, retain these public discovery destinations:
+
+- [Standard Repository Policies](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy).
+- [Current adoption and update guide](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/branch/main/docs/adoption.md).
+
+Discovery links follow the current upstream project and guide. Adopted-source,
+notice, and example links remain commit-pinned. Preserve valid pinned example
+references supplied by the selected policy, or pin them to this review revision
+after checking the referenced assets; do not turn them into moving-branch links.
+
+Adapt upstream `agents/AGENTS.md` into Audita's root orientation, retaining its
+existing applicable instructions. Add the adoption guide's Policy Reading Guide
+to `docs/development.md` and retain the component-specific task guide. Route
+policy adoption and updates to `meta.md`, repository recommendations and changes
+to agents, application-code or structure work to architecture, validation choices
+to testing, documentation work to documentation, dependency/licensing work to
+OSS, and release/versioning work to release policy. Read applicable policies
+before their decisions, reuse unchanged context, and expand reading with scope.
+Do not require reading the entire suite for every task.
+
+## Copied Policy Licensing and Local Material
+
+Follow the selected revision's
+[canonical policy attribution entry](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/examples/licensing/policy-attribution.md)
+and [project grant](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/COPYRIGHT).
+Insert the entry beneath the title in `docs/oss/attribution.md`, substitute the
+full review commit in all three URLs, and accurately identify copied/adapted
+material, including orientation or reading-guide text where copied. Preserve
+supplied creator, copyright, license, disclaimer notices, and modification
+indications. Keep the material statement concise.
+
+Copy `CC-BY-SA-4.0.txt` into `docs/oss/licenses/`. Add the adoption guide's scoped
+notice to `COPYRIGHT`, identifying the adapted policies as CC-BY-SA-4.0 and
+routing readers to attribution for the affected material. Account accurately for
+other copied guidance in that scope. Audita's application code remains
+GPL-3.0-or-later; unrelated documentation is not automatically relicensed.
+The root GPLv3 `LICENSE` needs no change.
+
+| Material | Destination or treatment |
+| --- | --- |
+| Applicable policies, including `meta.md` and `oss.md` | Copy and customize under `docs/policy/`, retaining provenance. |
+| Upstream `agents/AGENTS.md` | Adapt into root `AGENTS.md`. |
+| Selective reading guidance | Integrate into Audita's own `docs/development.md`. |
+| Upstream README, root AGENTS.md, developer guide, and adoption guide | Keep upstream and consult through links; do not copy as local guides. |
+| Licensing example collection | Keep upstream with commit-pinned references; use it to create actual notices. Original example formatting is CC0 and alone needs no policy attribution entry. |
+| Applicable standard and companion license texts | Copy complete, unmodified texts locally; no blanket collection. |
+
+## Component Attribution
+
+Complete the previously agreed inventory of relevant incorporated or distributed
+components: direct and transitive dependencies, copied code/documentation/assets,
+and applicable Go runtime notices. Determine inclusion from actual material and
+use, not simply presence in `go.mod`; tooling or consultation alone does not
+require an entry. Inspect selected sources directly rather than copying a
+dependency's attribution document wholesale.
+
+Use the exact House Format in OSS policy 1.8: the prescribed title followed by
+component entries, factual identification, applicable supplied copyrights and
+SPDX expressions, standard license/notice labels, and `[Source](COMMIT_URL).`
+links. Omit unavailable optional fields instead of adding explanatory filler.
+Preserve required upstream material, license alternatives, and exceptions.
+Keep research narratives, compliance conclusions, and exception reasoning out
+of attribution; place reasoning in the OSS policy or an appropriate decision
+record. This replaces the older roadmap's permission to put exception reasoning
+in a component entry.
+
+Upstream component and notice links identify exact imported commits. Local
+standard texts include directly reachable companions, such as GPLv3 for LGPLv3.
+Apply the adopted house interpretation of notice links without blanket extra
+local-copy requirements or repeated approval. Concrete obligations beyond notice
+reproduction receive their own applicable treatment; the format alone does not
+certify compatibility or resolve every distribution obligation.
+
+The reviewed dependency revisions remain useful starting evidence, subject to
+checking the dependencies selected when implementation occurs:
+
+| Component | Reviewed version | Source commit |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| ConfigKit | v0.4.1 | `0adb94f59e44827908eff401d4381a398fe17107` |
+| PromptKit | v0.11.1 | `15e40679546f2e21b6f51cc84b6f0a087a8486db` |
+| OpenRouter catalog | v2.20260926.0 | `4f731d217e0bc39151c010f50fb5912706e7b6b3` |
+| Rakestrawhome catalog | v2.20260926.0 | `48918a3ad39fd99843cda94a86133b1b3881d596` |
+
+These library patches changed licensing/documentation rather than library code
+or catalog profiles. ConfigKit and PromptKit identify LGPL-3.0-or-later; the
+selected catalogs identify MIT. Other relevant dependencies still need inventory.
+
+## Discoverability and Release Integration
+
+End README with the project-license and attribution statements prescribed by the
+OSS policy, using Audita's actual grant. `COPYRIGHT` owns the separately licensed
+policy scope; README links to that grant and the attribution document.
+
+Update `docs/release.md` to specify the final `COPYRIGHT | LICENSE | ATTRIBUTION`
+links in every new release note and hosted download page. Use absolute Gitea URLs
+at the release's immutable tag or source commit. Reuse the checked-in note as the
+hosted body where supported; verify the publication plugin's supported mechanism
+and make the necessary focused `.woodpecker/release.yml` change. Avoid separately
+maintained release prose or notice lists.
+
+Preserve the current atomic source/tag publication approach, supported targets,
+and completion point. Align procedure wording with upstream's preparation,
+ambiguous-push recovery, and asynchronous retry rules. Handle completed-roadmap
+retirement during preparation, preserving planned/deferred work and repairing
+links; this roadmap update does not authorize deleting other roadmaps now.
+
+Check intended future-tag paths against the candidate source without requiring
+the tag to resolve before publication. Apply the formatting convention
+prospectively; leave published tags, notes, artifacts, and checksums intact.
+Concrete historical omissions, if discovered, receive deliberate treatment under
+their applicable terms and release correction rules.
+
+## Work Required and Acceptance Criteria
+
+Implementation covers the seven policy documents, `AGENTS.md`,
+`docs/development.md`, `COPYRIGHT`, `docs/oss/attribution.md`, applicable files in
+`docs/oss/licenses/`, README, the release procedure, and focused hosted-body
+publication wiring. Update this roadmap's implementation status when appropriate.
+The [implementation plan](implementation.md) owns the editing sequence and
+verification steps.
+
+The work is complete when:
+
+- Shared policy language matches the selected upstream revision after required
+  template removal and customization; retained variations have substantive
+  Audita-specific reasons as identified above.
+- All seven policies have accurate versions, adoption dates, and file-specific
+  commit-pinned source links. Public discovery links and selective orientation
+  are in place, with no leftover template-only instructions or broken links.
+- Copied policy/guidance scope, modification status, credit, CC-BY-SA text, and
+  root grant notice follow the documented upstream arrangement while preserving
+  Audita's application license.
+- Relevant components have verified House Format entries, exact source/notice
+  commits, and complete applicable license texts, without editorial commentary.
+- README and future release documentation provide the required navigation, and
+  hosted release content comes from the checked-in note through a verified
+  publication mechanism.
+- Audita's application contracts, architectural decisions, platform commitments,
+  release completion semantics, and published history are preserved.
+- Affected text, links, license copies, metadata, and publication configuration
+  pass proportionate review and validation. No release is needed solely to test
+  adoption; behavioral workflow changes receive focused validation if required.
+
+## Scope Boundaries and Open Questions
+
+No policy decisions remain open for the agreed scope. Component-specific notices
+and the publication plugin's supported release-body mechanism require factual
+verification during implementation. Raise a decision only for a concrete
+unresolved obligation or material tradeoff uncovered by that work.
+
+This feature does not require application refactoring, dependency upgrades,
+mandatory scanners, a full SBOM, recurring legal approvals, synchronization
+checks, additional human release gates, publication-time network checks, or CI
+waiting. The documentation convention alone does not require downloadable
+license assets, source bundles, or a different binary package format.

go.mod

@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ module gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/audita
 go 1.25.5
 
 require (
-	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit v0.4.0
-	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit v0.11.0
+	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit v0.4.2
+	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit v0.11.2
 	gopkg.in/yaml.v3 v3.0.1
 )
 
 require (
-	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2 v2.20260922.1 // indirect
-	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2 v2.20260922.0 // indirect
+	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2 v2.20260926.0 // indirect
+	gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2 v2.20260926.0 // indirect
 	github.com/kr/pretty v0.3.1 // indirect
 	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal v1.14.1 // indirect
 	github.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6 v6.0.2 // indirect

go.sum

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit v0.4.0 h1:fo+vKff3zTGeWqJIA38NtT84b6OUP//9ZmBH3lFuKgk=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit v0.4.0/go.mod h1:tYWpsrbLyu05r8+1MapWp5fN6ZrX9I8hU2xEPedYmYk=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit v0.11.0 h1:x7JguOUiInPVXK0GEitjyoRFqqvcuSTjYUvqJ+whtik=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit v0.11.0/go.mod h1:0zEBVlJJC+ldDdXazAgybYBXNSe74vwFx5dyOuSos/w=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2 v2.20260922.1 h1:S2/Q/JDE+m8Ca3pDhAjVbfYrdlEhs9blj0STgNopHo0=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2 v2.20260922.1/go.mod h1:a3VBbh9oaGXD6ruxhtwHj+AWW6DY/SSyby1QtMmYSUo=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2 v2.20260922.0 h1:Y0EXc3eh12eKW2NrOviVqdk3oBo6UUjopt1YAa1B3Oc=
-gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2 v2.20260922.0/go.mod h1:mtgD1E0SGm0e/I8Ffhz+AYX7GN7RKUWJXehNFIKHs4Y=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit v0.4.2 h1:ZMxmv8pOnLtAx2hFTf8Z+pHKUbR89xErkBhwjr4yK24=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/ConfigKit v0.4.2/go.mod h1:tYWpsrbLyu05r8+1MapWp5fN6ZrX9I8hU2xEPedYmYk=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit v0.11.2 h1:2RqI+KtflvSh7vLQaTAQCmMaFQscEA7EPwPazyvXRoY=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit v0.11.2/go.mod h1:onm/FBPUKQ8/NSPwTEk26Ut+dVX2iXcq8vEseB+g/0E=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2 v2.20260926.0 h1:wdab+R+lgMZxzYwhbAuCrW7zdSQ1cW9ovBR6UzLmZR4=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-openrouter/v2 v2.20260926.0/go.mod h1:a3VBbh9oaGXD6ruxhtwHj+AWW6DY/SSyby1QtMmYSUo=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2 v2.20260926.0 h1:baCCIB6Ee5t0S4Zc++NTBIPcJEv5UPS6DlSrpZfykwg=
+gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/promptkit-backend-rakestrawhome/v2 v2.20260926.0/go.mod h1:mtgD1E0SGm0e/I8Ffhz+AYX7GN7RKUWJXehNFIKHs4Y=
 github.com/creack/pty v1.1.9/go.mod h1:oKZEueFk5CKHvIhNR5MUki03XCEU+Q6VDXinZuGJ33E=
 github.com/dlclark/regexp2 v1.11.0 h1:G/nrcoOa7ZXlpoa/91N3X7mM3r8eIlMBBJZvsz/mxKI=
 github.com/dlclark/regexp2 v1.11.0/go.mod h1:DHkYz0B9wPfa6wondMfaivmHpzrQ3v9q8cnmRbL6yW8=