Added new deterministic validators to catch early failures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ from audita.framework.proposal_generation import generate_llm_correction_proposa
|
||||
from audita.modules.prompts import build_glossary_proposal_messages
|
||||
from audita.validators import (
|
||||
GlossaryStageProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator,
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator,
|
||||
MeaningReversalValidator,
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator,
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator,
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator,
|
||||
SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator,
|
||||
Validator,
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +22,8 @@ class GlossaryModule:
|
||||
|
||||
def validators(self) -> Sequence[Validator]:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator("identical_text_guard"),
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator("original_text_present_guard"),
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator("proposal_confidence_guard", "glossary_confidence_threshold"),
|
||||
GlossaryStageProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator("glossary_stage_protected_glossary_guard"),
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator("non_empty_segment_guard"),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ from audita.framework.proposal_generation import generate_llm_correction_proposa
|
||||
from audita.modules.prompts import build_grammar_proposal_messages
|
||||
from audita.validators import (
|
||||
GrammarOnlyValidator,
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator,
|
||||
MeaningReversalValidator,
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator,
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator,
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator,
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator,
|
||||
Validator,
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +22,8 @@ class GrammarModule:
|
||||
|
||||
def validators(self) -> Sequence[Validator]:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator("identical_text_guard"),
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator("original_text_present_guard"),
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator("proposal_confidence_guard", "grammar_confidence_threshold"),
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator("protected_glossary_guard"),
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator("non_empty_segment_guard"),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ from audita.framework.models import CorrectionProposal, ModuleContext
|
||||
from audita.framework.proposal_generation import generate_llm_correction_proposals
|
||||
from audita.modules.prompts import build_homophones_proposal_messages
|
||||
from audita.validators import (
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator,
|
||||
MeaningReversalValidator,
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator,
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator,
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator,
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator,
|
||||
SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator,
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +22,8 @@ class HomophonesModule:
|
||||
|
||||
def validators(self) -> Sequence[Validator]:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator("identical_text_guard"),
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator("original_text_present_guard"),
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator("proposal_confidence_guard", "homophones_confidence_threshold"),
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator("protected_glossary_guard"),
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator("non_empty_segment_guard"),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ from audita.framework.models import CorrectionProposal, ModuleContext
|
||||
from audita.framework.proposal_generation import generate_llm_correction_proposals
|
||||
from audita.modules.prompts import build_spoken_word_proposal_messages
|
||||
from audita.validators import (
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator,
|
||||
MeaningReversalValidator,
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator,
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator,
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator,
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator,
|
||||
SpokenWordValidator,
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +22,8 @@ class SpokenWordModule:
|
||||
|
||||
def validators(self) -> Sequence[Validator]:
|
||||
return [
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator("identical_text_guard"),
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator("original_text_present_guard"),
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator("proposal_confidence_guard", "spoken_word_confidence_threshold"),
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator("protected_glossary_guard"),
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator("non_empty_segment_guard"),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ from .base import ValidationContext, ValidationDecision, ValidationResult, Valid
|
||||
from .deterministic import (
|
||||
GlossaryStageProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator,
|
||||
GrammarOnlyValidator,
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator,
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator,
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator,
|
||||
ProposalConfidenceValidator,
|
||||
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator,
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -14,6 +16,8 @@ __all__ = [
|
||||
"ValidationDecision",
|
||||
"ValidationResult",
|
||||
"Validator",
|
||||
"IdenticalTextValidator",
|
||||
"OriginalTextPresentValidator",
|
||||
"ProposalConfidenceValidator",
|
||||
"ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator",
|
||||
"GlossaryStageProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,6 +7,58 @@ from .base import ValidationContext, ValidationDecision, ValidationResult
|
||||
from .protection import ProtectedVocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class IdenticalTextValidator:
|
||||
name: str
|
||||
execution_kind: str = "deterministic"
|
||||
|
||||
def validate(self, context: ValidationContext) -> ValidationResult:
|
||||
return ValidationResult(
|
||||
validator_name=self.name,
|
||||
execution_kind=self.execution_kind,
|
||||
decisions=[
|
||||
ValidationDecision(
|
||||
proposal_index=proposal.proposal_index,
|
||||
approved=proposal.original_text != proposal.corrected_text,
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
None
|
||||
if proposal.original_text != proposal.corrected_text
|
||||
else "proposal original_text and corrected_text are identical"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
for proposal in context.proposals
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class OriginalTextPresentValidator:
|
||||
name: str
|
||||
execution_kind: str = "deterministic"
|
||||
|
||||
def validate(self, context: ValidationContext) -> ValidationResult:
|
||||
segment_text_by_id = {segment.id: segment.text for segment in context.transcript}
|
||||
return ValidationResult(
|
||||
validator_name=self.name,
|
||||
execution_kind=self.execution_kind,
|
||||
decisions=[
|
||||
ValidationDecision(
|
||||
proposal_index=proposal.proposal_index,
|
||||
approved=(
|
||||
(segment_text := segment_text_by_id.get(proposal.id)) is None
|
||||
or proposal.original_text in segment_text
|
||||
),
|
||||
reason=(
|
||||
None
|
||||
if (segment_text := segment_text_by_id.get(proposal.id)) is None or proposal.original_text in segment_text
|
||||
else "proposal original_text does not match segment text"
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
for proposal in context.proposals
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
||||
class ProposalConfidenceValidator:
|
||||
name: str
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,7 +5,12 @@ from audita.core.config import AuditaConfig
|
||||
from audita.core.errors import AuditaLLMError
|
||||
from audita.core.schemas import parse_glossary_yaml, parse_transcript_json
|
||||
from audita.framework.models import CorrectionProposal, ModuleRunSpec
|
||||
from audita.validators import GrammarOnlyValidator, NonEmptySegmentValidator
|
||||
from audita.validators import (
|
||||
GrammarOnlyValidator,
|
||||
IdenticalTextValidator,
|
||||
NonEmptySegmentValidator,
|
||||
OriginalTextPresentValidator,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from audita.validators.base import ValidationContext
|
||||
from audita.validators.llm import MeaningReversalValidator, SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator, SpokenWordValidator
|
||||
from audita.validators.prompts import (
|
||||
@@ -550,6 +555,96 @@ def test_non_empty_segment_validator_allows_punctuation_only_and_unpreviewable_p
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_identical_text_validator_rejects_exact_noops_only(tmp_path):
|
||||
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "hello"},
|
||||
{"id": 2, "speaker": "A", "start": 1.0, "end": 2.0, "text": "hello"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = [
|
||||
CorrectionProposal(
|
||||
proposal_index=0,
|
||||
module_instance="grammar",
|
||||
module_key="grammar",
|
||||
id=1,
|
||||
original_text="hello",
|
||||
corrected_text="hello",
|
||||
confidence=0.95,
|
||||
),
|
||||
CorrectionProposal(
|
||||
proposal_index=1,
|
||||
module_instance="grammar",
|
||||
module_key="grammar",
|
||||
id=2,
|
||||
original_text="hello",
|
||||
corrected_text="Hello",
|
||||
confidence=0.95,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
result = IdenticalTextValidator("identical_text_guard").validate(
|
||||
_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=None, tmp_path=tmp_path)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert [(decision.proposal_index, decision.approved, decision.reason) for decision in result.decisions] == [
|
||||
(0, False, "proposal original_text and corrected_text are identical"),
|
||||
(1, True, None),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_original_text_present_validator_rejects_missing_spans_and_allows_present_or_unknown_segments(tmp_path):
|
||||
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "hello hello"},
|
||||
{"id": 2, "speaker": "A", "start": 1.0, "end": 2.0, "text": "goodbye"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = [
|
||||
CorrectionProposal(
|
||||
proposal_index=0,
|
||||
module_instance="homophones",
|
||||
module_key="homophones",
|
||||
id=1,
|
||||
original_text="hello",
|
||||
corrected_text="hi",
|
||||
confidence=0.95,
|
||||
),
|
||||
CorrectionProposal(
|
||||
proposal_index=1,
|
||||
module_instance="homophones",
|
||||
module_key="homophones",
|
||||
id=2,
|
||||
original_text="rank",
|
||||
corrected_text="Hrank",
|
||||
confidence=0.95,
|
||||
),
|
||||
CorrectionProposal(
|
||||
proposal_index=2,
|
||||
module_instance="homophones",
|
||||
module_key="homophones",
|
||||
id=99,
|
||||
original_text="missing",
|
||||
corrected_text="present",
|
||||
confidence=0.95,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
result = OriginalTextPresentValidator("original_text_present_guard").validate(
|
||||
_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=None, tmp_path=tmp_path)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert [(decision.proposal_index, decision.approved, decision.reason) for decision in result.decisions] == [
|
||||
(0, True, None),
|
||||
(1, False, "proposal original_text does not match segment text"),
|
||||
(2, True, None),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
|
||||
("validator", "payload", "message_fragment"),
|
||||
[
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
from audita.core.chunking import chunk_transcript
|
||||
from audita.core.config import AuditaConfig
|
||||
from audita.core.config import AuditaConfig, ConfigOverrides
|
||||
from audita.core.errors import AuditaLLMError
|
||||
from audita.core.schemas import parse_glossary_yaml, parse_source_transcript_json, parse_transcript_json
|
||||
from audita.framework.models import ModuleContext, ModuleRunSpec
|
||||
@@ -418,8 +418,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_rejects_below_threshold_proposals_before_llm_
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].reason == "proposal confidence below threshold"
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].source == "validator:proposal_confidence_guard"
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[0].rejected_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[1].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[2].rejected_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[3].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_transcript_result_runs_spoken_word_module_with_full_validator_chain(tmp_path):
|
||||
@@ -498,6 +498,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_runs_spoken_word_module_with_full_validator_c
|
||||
"spoken_word:meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[0].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -558,7 +560,7 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_rejects_spoken_word_below_threshold_before_ll
|
||||
assert result.transcript[0].text == "I, uh, I think we should go."
|
||||
assert [call["stage_name"] for call in client.calls] == ["spoken_word:proposal"]
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].reason == "proposal confidence below threshold"
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[1].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[3].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_transcript_result_runs_grammar_module_with_full_validator_chain(tmp_path):
|
||||
@@ -626,6 +628,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_runs_grammar_module_with_full_validator_chain
|
||||
"grammar:meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[0].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -752,7 +756,7 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_rejects_grammar_below_threshold_before_later_
|
||||
assert result.transcript[0].text == "hello world"
|
||||
assert [call["stage_name"] for call in client.calls] == ["grammar:proposal"]
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].reason == "proposal confidence below threshold"
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[1].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[3].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_transcript_result_grammar_module_still_rejects_homophone_style_proposals(tmp_path):
|
||||
@@ -864,11 +868,100 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_rejects_spoken_word_whole_segment_deletion_be
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].source == "validator:non_empty_segment_guard"
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].reason == "correction would leave the segment empty"
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[0].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
"spoken_word_review",
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[2].rejected_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[3].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[4].rejected_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[5].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_transcript_result_rejects_identical_text_before_later_validators(tmp_path):
|
||||
transcript = parse_source_transcript_json(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"speaker": "Eric", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "hello world"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
config = AuditaConfig.from_sources(
|
||||
env={},
|
||||
overrides=ConfigOverrides(work_dir=tmp_path / "work", work_dir_retention="always"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient(
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"corrections": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 1,
|
||||
"original_text": "hello",
|
||||
"corrected_text": "hello",
|
||||
"confidence": 0.95,
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = process_transcript_result(
|
||||
transcript,
|
||||
_glossary(),
|
||||
config,
|
||||
module_keys=["grammar"],
|
||||
llm_client=client,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert result.transcript[0].text == "hello world"
|
||||
assert [call["stage_name"] for call in client.calls] == ["grammar:proposal"]
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].source == "validator:identical_text_guard"
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].reason == "proposal original_text and corrected_text are identical"
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[0].rejected_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[1].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_transcript_result_rejects_missing_original_text_before_later_validators(tmp_path):
|
||||
transcript = parse_source_transcript_json(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"speaker": "Eric", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "hello world"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
"""
|
||||
)
|
||||
config = AuditaConfig.from_sources(
|
||||
env={},
|
||||
overrides=ConfigOverrides(work_dir=tmp_path / "work", work_dir_retention="always"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient(
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"corrections": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 1,
|
||||
"original_text": "goodbye",
|
||||
"corrected_text": "farewell",
|
||||
"confidence": 0.95,
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
result = process_transcript_result(
|
||||
transcript,
|
||||
_glossary(),
|
||||
config,
|
||||
module_keys=["grammar"],
|
||||
llm_client=client,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert result.transcript[0].text == "hello world"
|
||||
assert [call["stage_name"] for call in client.calls] == ["grammar:proposal"]
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].source == "validator:original_text_present_guard"
|
||||
assert result.report.skipped_corrections[0].reason == "proposal original_text does not match segment text"
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[0].approved_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[1].rejected_count == 1
|
||||
assert result.report.modules[0].validators[2].candidate_count == 0
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_writes_report_and_preserves_skips_per_policy(
|
||||
assert (result.run_dir / "report.json").exists()
|
||||
assert (result.run_dir / "normalization" / "summary.json").exists()
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[0].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"glossary_stage_protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -136,6 +138,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_writes_report_and_preserves_skips_per_policy(
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[2].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"glossary_stage_protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +147,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_writes_report_and_preserves_skips_per_policy(
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[3].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -150,6 +156,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_writes_report_and_preserves_skips_per_policy(
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[4].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -190,6 +198,8 @@ def test_default_module_specs_expose_final_validator_order():
|
||||
"grammar",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[0].module.validators()] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"glossary_stage_protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -197,6 +207,8 @@ def test_default_module_specs_expose_final_validator_order():
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[1].module.validators()] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -204,6 +216,8 @@ def test_default_module_specs_expose_final_validator_order():
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[2].module.validators()] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"glossary_stage_protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -211,6 +225,8 @@ def test_default_module_specs_expose_final_validator_order():
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[3].module.validators()] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
@@ -218,6 +234,8 @@ def test_default_module_specs_expose_final_validator_order():
|
||||
"meaning_reversal_review",
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[4].module.validators()] == [
|
||||
"identical_text_guard",
|
||||
"original_text_present_guard",
|
||||
"proposal_confidence_guard",
|
||||
"protected_glossary_guard",
|
||||
"non_empty_segment_guard",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user