41 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# Feature 0002A Remediation Review
|
|
|
|
Status: resolved
|
|
|
|
The field-specific Audita configuration implementation has the intended
|
|
architecture and its complete integration suite passes.
|
|
|
|
## Finding 2: Synchronize Amendment Progress Tracking
|
|
|
|
Severity: low
|
|
|
|
The configuration amendment was completed in `ansible-role-audita` commits
|
|
`e61f02f` and `847c4c3`, while the implementation plan and workspace status
|
|
still described it as awaiting execution.
|
|
|
|
### Resolution
|
|
|
|
- Recorded the completed amendment commits in the durable Feature 0002
|
|
roadmap.
|
|
- Marked Feature 0002 complete in workspace status.
|
|
- Replaced the completed fixed-location implementation plan with a pending-plan
|
|
notice for Feature 0003.
|
|
- Preserved Feature 0003 as the next proposed unit of work and identified its
|
|
configuration-interface revision as the next roadmap-review step.
|
|
|
|
## Review Conclusion
|
|
|
|
No code remediation was required. A proposed assertion that the configuration
|
|
was a regular file was rejected because a successful
|
|
`ansible.builtin.template` operation already establishes the specified file
|
|
state. Adding another assertion would re-prove the module's documented
|
|
postcondition and conflict with the workspace convention to trust Ansible's
|
|
abstraction boundary.
|
|
|
|
The review ran the complete `tests/integration` suite on Ubuntu 26.04 with
|
|
Ansible Core 2.21.3 and ansible-lint 26.8.0. It passed default minimal
|
|
rendering, representative nested rendering, explicit falsey values, native
|
|
configuration validation, configuration-only convergence, both rebuild
|
|
triggers, dependency opt-out, metadata repair, restored default state,
|
|
repeated convergence, and platform rejection. `git diff --check` also passed.
|