Plan synchronization of delivery test fixtures
This commit is contained in:
103
docs/roadmap/race.md
Normal file
103
docs/roadmap/race.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
|
||||
# Roadmap: synchronize delivery test fixtures
|
||||
|
||||
Status: planned; implementation has not started.
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective and evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Make the delivery HTTP fixtures safe for concurrent access by test goroutines
|
||||
and request handlers while preserving their existing behavioral assertions.
|
||||
The [PromptKit bug report](promptkit-bug-report.md) supplies the original
|
||||
diagnostics and consumer context.
|
||||
|
||||
Upstream investigation reproduced
|
||||
`TestReleaseKitSourceDeliveryWorkflowFromTaggedCheckout` under the race detector
|
||||
with Go 1.26.8. The diagnostics identified `commit`, `remoteCommit`, and
|
||||
`releaseCreates` accesses shared between the workflow test and HTTP handlers.
|
||||
The workflow test and relevant unsynchronized accesses predate v0.4.0.
|
||||
Subprocess completion supplies no synchronization for this shared Go state.
|
||||
|
||||
The ordinary Woodpecker and multi-module workflow tests passed their focused
|
||||
race-enabled runs during investigation. Source inspection nevertheless found
|
||||
the same unsynchronized state pattern in their fixtures. A passing run alone
|
||||
does not establish safe access under other scheduling.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
|
||||
The correction belongs in test infrastructure:
|
||||
|
||||
- The `deliveryServerState`, `newDeliveryServer`, and `writeDeliveryRelease`
|
||||
helpers in [main_test.go](../../cmd/releasekit/main_test.go), including all
|
||||
tests using that fixture.
|
||||
- The [source-delivery workflow test](../../cmd/releasekit/releasekit_delivery_workflow_test.go)
|
||||
and [ordinary Woodpecker workflow tests](../../cmd/releasekit/woodpecker_test.go).
|
||||
- The `mappedDeliveryFixture`, `newMappedDeliveryFixture`, and their consumers
|
||||
in [multi_module_woodpecker_test.go](../../cmd/releasekit/multi_module_woodpecker_test.go).
|
||||
|
||||
Production behavior, public API contracts, and release requirements retain their
|
||||
current definitions. Use the standard library and small fixture-local helpers,
|
||||
following the [agent](../policy/agents.md) and
|
||||
[testing](../policy/testing.md) policies.
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Synchronize the shared delivery fixture.** Give mutable fixture state a
|
||||
`sync.Mutex`. Protect handler reads and writes, test-side configuration
|
||||
changes, assertion reads, counters, page state, note content, and asset-map
|
||||
operations with the same mutex. Initialize immutable configuration before
|
||||
serving requests where practical; synchronize later initialization such as
|
||||
the source commit assigned after profile creation. Review captured handler
|
||||
values and response helpers as part of this boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update every shared-fixture consumer.** Use simple locked setters and
|
||||
snapshot accessors for test configuration and assertions. Snapshot plain
|
||||
values separately from the mutex, copying maps and mutable byte slices when
|
||||
they will be inspected outside the lock. Include failure diagnostics that
|
||||
format fixture state. Keep lock ownership clear in handler helpers and
|
||||
release locks before executing CLI workflows or closing the server.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Apply the same discipline to the mapped fixture.** Protect its commit,
|
||||
request and creation counters, page fields, uploads, and asset map, together
|
||||
with all corresponding test accesses. Keep each fixture's synchronization
|
||||
local and proportionate to its existing responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Preserve behavioral coverage.** Retain rejection of mismatched hosted tags
|
||||
before release creation, exact source-tag preservation, complete note bodies,
|
||||
idempotent page and asset delivery, expected asset counts, mapped module
|
||||
identity, retries using tagged configuration, and existing failure outcomes.
|
||||
Use these workflows as the regression coverage for the reported race. Add
|
||||
further coverage only for a concrete gap discovered during the correction.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification and completion
|
||||
|
||||
With dependencies prepared, run the affected workflows from the repository root
|
||||
using the local toolchain and offline module settings:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
GOTOOLCHAIN=local GOWORK=off GOPROXY=off GOSUMDB=off \
|
||||
go test -race -mod=readonly -count=1 ./cmd/releasekit \
|
||||
-run '^(TestReleaseKitSourceDeliveryWorkflowFromTaggedCheckout|TestWoodpeckerTagDeliveryTemplate|TestMultiModuleWoodpeckerDelivery)$'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then run the full race-enabled suite once to verify the other shared-fixture
|
||||
users and catch remaining cross-goroutine access:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
GOTOOLCHAIN=local GOWORK=off GOPROXY=off GOSUMDB=off \
|
||||
go test -race -mod=readonly -count=1 ./...
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Review the fixture accesses as well as the test results: successful execution
|
||||
complements the synchronization review. Keep local Git repositories, HTTP
|
||||
servers, and synthetic module caches isolated as described in
|
||||
[development](../development.md#testing-synthetic-modules).
|
||||
|
||||
Completion means both fixtures and their consumers use synchronized state,
|
||||
the existing assertions remain effective, and the focused and full race-enabled
|
||||
suites pass. Record completion and verification here and update the bug report's
|
||||
status with the remediation outcome. Commit the completed correction under the
|
||||
repository's ordinary change workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
This verification addresses the reported defect. Future release validation
|
||||
continues to follow the [release procedure](../release.md). The correction is
|
||||
suitable for a subsequent patch release; preparation and publication are separate
|
||||
work under that procedure, preserving the published v0.4.0 contents.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user