ConfigKit/docs/policy/release.md

# Release Policy

**Base Policy Version:** 1.4

**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28

**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/release.md)

## Purpose

This policy defines a proportionate workflow for validating and publishing an
intended source revision under a fresh version. Releases should require little
routine intervention, avoid repeated work, and preserve published contents.

The repository-specific commands belong in `docs/release.md`. Historical release
summaries belong in `docs/releases/`. The procedure must agree with the adopted
policy and link to it rather than introduce additional release requirements.

## ConfigKit Applicability

ConfigKit publishes a source-only Go module. Its declared deliverables are the
immutable annotated source tag and version-matched checked-in release note.
Standalone binaries, container images, hosted release objects, and separate
registry publication are not required. Additional channels require a deliberate
update to the policy and procedure.

The Go API, documented YAML and resolution semantics, and structured diagnostic
contracts participate in compatibility review. A signature-preserving change
can still break consumers. Human diagnostic wording is stable only where a
contract expressly promises it. Minimum Go version and platform support
changes also require an explicit compatibility assessment.

### Platform Support

Linux is the release-validated platform. macOS has best-effort support: keeping
it working remains desirable, but neither native macOS validation nor Darwin
cross-builds are release gates. Missing macOS evidence or a macOS-specific failure
does not by itself block a release. Voluntary checks and fixes are welcome; there
is no guarantee that each release has been validated on macOS.

The [release procedure](../release.md#release-identity-and-support) owns target
architectures and required Linux checks. Historical release notes and their
validation records remain unchanged.

## Release Model And Completion

A source release identifies one exact committed source revision through an
immutable version tag and a version-matched, checked-in release note. The
primary release branch is `main` unless the adopted policy specifies otherwise.
The procedure must name the authoritative publication remote.

A successful push of the intended tag, with its source commit available on the
authoritative primary branch, completes the release. The source commit may be
pushed before the tag or published together with it through an atomic push.
The procedure must choose and document the supported approach.

ConfigKit uses sequential explicit pushes: first the captured candidate to
authoritative `main`, then the annotated tag. Its
[release procedure](../release.md) names `origin` and checks that its fetch and
push destinations resolve to the authoritative URL.

Release commands must finish at successful publication. They must not wait for
or poll CI, require successful CI status, inspect downloadable artifacts, or
check consumer installation or Go module availability as completion gates.
A failed or ambiguous push requires resolving the authoritative remote state
before declaring success or retrying; successful pushes do not require a
separate remote read-back gate.

Remote tag read-back and fresh consumer retrieval are optional and non-gating
after successful publication. A failed push receives one bounded check of the
authoritative ref; do not poll or blindly retry.

Repositories may publish source only. Additional binaries, images, packages,
checksums, or other declared deliverables may be published asynchronously from
the tagged source. The procedure must identify those deliverables and the
responsibility of their automation. Published deliverables must be traceable
to that source and identify the same version.

ConfigKit currently declares no additional deliverables. Its source-tag push
is the completion point.

## Versioning And Compatibility

Stable releases use Semantic Versioning in the form `vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH`, with
no leading zeroes. Prereleases require an explicit adopted policy defining
their format and use.

ConfigKit does not support prereleases.

The selected version must be unused locally and on the authoritative remote.
Do not require queries to every configured remote or publication service.
A version known to have already been published must not be reused, even if the
normal guards do not inspect that channel. Adding a distribution channel
requires a deliberate update to the policy and procedure where needed.

For releases at or after `v1.0.0`:

- a major release may make intentional incompatible changes;
- a minor release may add backward-compatible behavior; and
- a patch release may make backward-compatible fixes.

Before `v1.0.0`, a minor release may change a documented public, operational,
configuration, data, integration, or compatibility contract when the release
note explains the impact and required consumer action. A patch release must
not intentionally break those contracts within its minor line.

Additional compatibility promises and deliberate exceptions belong in the
adopted policy or canonical contract documentation. Release notes explain
changes; they do not redefine current compatibility contracts.

## Release Documentation And Preparation

Every new release must include `docs/releases/<version>.md` in the tagged
source tree. Use the complete version tag as the filename and begin with a
title containing the product name and that exact version.

ConfigKit requires the first line `# ConfigKit <version>`.

Include a short summary and any relevant compatibility impact or upgrade
instructions. Choose sections suited to the release and keep the note
proportionate to the change.

Keep exact current contracts in their canonical documents and update affected
documentation with the behavior change. Link to those documents from the note
where useful. If annotated tags are used, derive their summary from the
checked-in note.

ConfigKit uses the complete checked-in note as the annotated tag message.

Include the release footer defined by the [OSS policy](oss.md#discoverability)
in each new release document. The release procedure defines the concrete URLs
and publication mechanics. Prepare these links with the release note; they do
not add a network check or approval gate. If a hosted download page is used in
a future channel, preserve the footer there.

Handle version selection, release-note content, and retirement of completed
roadmaps during preparation. Preserve planned and deferred work and repair
affected links when retiring roadmaps. Reuse ordinary change review for
unintended files, credentials, and private data. Scope release-content review
to the tagged source.

## Candidate Validation

Provide one publication command that validates the final committed candidate,
checks publication state, and publishes the intended refs. A validation-only
mode or command may be provided for diagnosis, but must not be a required step
before publication repeats the same checks.

ConfigKit uses `./scripts/release.sh vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH`. The separate
`scripts/release-check.sh` remains an optional diagnostic command; the
publication command invokes it once and does not use a persistent candidate
record.

Run the complete deterministic, offline default test suite once for the final
candidate, following the [testing policy](testing.md). For repositories that
publish builds, verify the required build targets. Select those targets for
the application's actual support commitments; native testing on each platform
and access to particular hardware are not default release prerequisites.

ConfigKit's one maintained Go 1.25 baseline runs the full suite with the race
detector and test-time vet disabled. This protects library behavior, ownership,
and concurrent use; the suite already includes examples, consumer fixtures,
documentation links, and package boundaries. One full vet pass adds static
checks beyond the test-time subset. CGO-disabled Linux amd64 and arm64 builds
cover supported configurations distinct from native race compilation. macOS
and newer-toolchain checks are optional.

Additional gates must address a concrete risk that the existing checks do not
adequately cover. Do not automatically require linting, race testing, module
hygiene audits, documentation audits, credential scans, example validation, or
expanded platform matrices solely because they are possible. Retain such
checks when their distinct protection justifies their cost. A one-time migration
check must not silently become a permanent release requirement.

The selected Go commands use readonly module mode with `GOPROXY=off`; acquire
the baseline toolchain and dependencies before validation. Formatting and
whitespace remain ordinary development checks in `scripts/check.sh`.
Review module tidiness when dependencies change, not as a release gate.

Release tests must not require real credentials, mutable application services,
paid APIs, provider probes, or inference calls. The procedure may describe dependency
preparation separately from offline validation.

Avoid duplicate validation across release phases. Successful checks for the
same final candidate need not be repeated solely to satisfy another phase;
any reuse must clearly apply to that exact candidate. Persistent validation
caches are not required. If the candidate changes, validate the new candidate.
Cheap publication-state checks may be repeated immediately before pushing
because local or remote state may have changed during validation.

Automate mechanical guards. Human review gates are strongly disfavored: add one
only through an explicit project-specific policy decision explaining the
concrete risk and why ordinary change review or automation is insufficient.
Do not add routine confirmations for checks the command can perform itself.

Compatibility review, release-note accuracy, completed-roadmap retirement, and
review for unintended files or credentials remain ordinary preparation. The
executing agent may perform them without routine human approval or separate
manual evidence records. Publication itself requires authorization.

## Publication Guards

Automate the checks needed to publish the intended source under a fresh version:

- the version has the adopted format and is unused locally and on the
  authoritative remote;
- the worktree and index are clean on the primary release branch;
- the source being published is the exact candidate that passed validation,
  including its matching release note;
- the remote primary branch can be advanced to that candidate without
  discarding remote history, and is published before the tag; and
- the tag identifies the validated candidate and only the intended refs are
  published.

ConfigKit also checks that `origin` has exactly the authoritative fetch and
push destination, including configured push URLs. The command checks the
candidate and unused version again after validation, and checks local state
before creating the tag. Ignored local files do not block publication.

Fetch the authoritative branch and tag state as needed for these checks.
Do not force branch or tag updates to bypass a failed guard. Publish explicit
refs rather than all local tags. Do not require CI success, publication-service
availability checks, or a separate manual confirmation for each guard.

## Immutability And Correction

Published version tags and published contents are immutable. Do not move,
overwrite, recreate, or delete a published tag, or replace a published artifact,
checksum, signature, provenance statement, or release note under that version.
The checked-in note at the immutable tag is that release's historical record.

If validation fails before publication, correct and commit the candidate and
rerun the publication command. If a push fails or its outcome is ambiguous,
inspect the authoritative remote before retrying. Remove an unpublished local
tag only after confirming it was never published or used by a release channel.
An unavailable remote leaves publication status unknown; do not overwrite a tag
to resolve uncertainty.

Transient network, authentication, CI, or consumer-availability failures do not
by themselves require a new version.

A defect requiring changes to published source or contents requires a corrected
commit, a new semantically appropriate version, a matching release note, and
the release procedure again. Leave the original release intact. A channel's
yank, deprecation, or advisory mechanism may warn consumers away from a defective
release without replacing its contents or reusing its version.

## Repository Release Procedure

Maintain `docs/release.md` as a short, executable maintainer runbook. It must
identify prerequisites, the primary branch and authoritative remote, version
and note preparation, one publication command with local checks and guards,
source-only deliverables, the successful-tag-push completion point, and
partial or unknown-state recovery.

Use copyable commands where practical. Keep optional diagnostics and consumer
verification clearly optional. The procedure must not turn preparation work,
ordinary change review, or post-publication investigation into additional
release gates.

## Policy Exceptions

The following historical exceptions do not change the current release workflow.

For v0.1.1 only, the maintainer approved renaming the reserved `_configkit` key to
`configkit` as an error-correcting point release because there are no current
consumers. This intentionally changes the v0.1.0 configuration contract without a
minor-version increment. The release note must explain the renamed directive,
the lack of a legacy alias, and the newly reserved application key. This exception
does not apply to subsequent releases or waive any validation or publication gate.

For v0.2.0 only, the maintainer accepted the successful native macOS check at
`244104f` for the final candidate, provided subsequent changes are documentation
only. The final candidate still requires the complete Linux release checker.
This exception waives only repeating the macOS check after those documentation
changes; it does not waive other publication or verification gates.