From f639f3bb1a3dd4d5181db6978294c3b99eeb3019 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Rakestraw Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 23:42:07 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update the prompt for the tomorrow weather report --- profiles/local/local-light.yml | 2 +- .../pipeline-weather/tomorrow/tomorrow_generated_text.user.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/profiles/local/local-light.yml b/profiles/local/local-light.yml index 6a14351..6851b5d 100644 --- a/profiles/local/local-light.yml +++ b/profiles/local/local-light.yml @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ id: local-light endpoint: https://inference.ai.rakestrawhome.com/v1 model: "nvidia/Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B" temperature: 0.15 -reasoning_effort: high +reasoning_effort: medium top_p: 0.98 timeout_seconds: 900 api_key_env: OPENROUTER_API_KEY diff --git a/prompts/pipeline-weather/tomorrow/tomorrow_generated_text.user.md b/prompts/pipeline-weather/tomorrow/tomorrow_generated_text.user.md index 24edd75..c0176ef 100644 --- a/prompts/pipeline-weather/tomorrow/tomorrow_generated_text.user.md +++ b/prompts/pipeline-weather/tomorrow/tomorrow_generated_text.user.md @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ The summary should typically consist of two sentences. If an active warning is relevant during the report period, lead with the hazard. Otherwise, the first sentence should state the most likely local weather outcome for the valid period, including the overall character of the weather and expected temperature/temperature range. -The second sentence should state the most important active hazard, caveat, uncertainty, or alternate outcome, if one exists. If there is no meaningful caveat, the second sentence may be omitted, or may briefly say that no major complications are apparent. +The second sentence should state the most important active hazard, caveat, uncertainty, or alternate outcome, if one exists. If there is no meaningful caveat, the second sentence may be omitted. In the lead, distinguish the main weather outcome from the caveat. If showers and thunderstorms have different timing, state that difference rather than combining them as a single risk throughout the valid period. If the main caveat is a regional severe-weather or precipitation risk displaced from the report location, state that limitation clearly.