Finalize computational efficiency evidence

docs/roadmap/implementation.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Implement the remaining local work in the [performance roadmap](performance.md)
 in order. Each sequential stage is scoped for one Luna coding-agent prompt.
 Update status and evidence as each work unit lands.
-Stages 1–13 are complete; Stage 14 remains pending. The completed
+Stages 1–14 are complete. The completed
 inspection plan is preserved at
 `481e2d4:docs/roadmap/implementation.md` in Git history.
 
@@ -545,6 +545,11 @@ redaction, repair, and details-after-completion behavior must continue to pass.
 
 ## Stage 14 — Consolidate Evidence And Verify The Complete Local Scope
 
+**Status: Complete (2026-10-09).** The complete local roadmap has been
+implemented, ownership decisions and before/after evidence are recorded, and
+the final suite, vet, example, formatting, and changed-document link checks
+passed. No release or publication work was performed.
+
 **Outcome:** The local roadmap scope is complete with clear measurements and
 unchanged consumer contracts.
 
@@ -928,7 +933,9 @@ repetitions on the same machine varied substantially; the timing evidence
 does not establish a reliable latency improvement or regression. The ordinary
 `Prepare`, `Run`, and public `Details()` allocation counts are unchanged within
 their recorded baseline ranges; this candidate only changes prepared-execution
-creation.
+creation. The `B/op` and `allocs/op` values are cumulative allocation per
+operation; the separate `retained-B` table is a post-GC live-heap delta for four
+handles. They measure different effects and are not inferred from one another.
 
 The focused internal snapshot benchmark isolates the same creation path using
 the Stage 12 fake-collaborator fixture. Times again list five samples, median,
@@ -1239,10 +1246,43 @@ attempts continue to use the frozen body. Verification passed:
 `go test -mod=readonly ./internal/llm ./internal/generation`, and the benchmark
 family above was rerun without the race detector.
 
+### Final Coverage And Verification
+
+Stage 13's ownership-transfer implementation, tests, runner documentation, and
+decision evidence are committed at `80aecb6` (`Reuse prepared execution
+snapshot ownership`). The completed local scope maps to the accepted roadmap as
+follows:
+
+- Item 1's ConfigKit performance request remains recorded at `d53021e`; no
+  upstream implementation or dependency update was included.
+- Items 2–5 are implemented in validation, rendering, request encoding, and
+  artifact reading. Their before/after fixtures, measurements, and focused
+  verification appear in the corresponding execution-evidence sections.
+- Item 6's ownership review selected the simpler private-payload transfer in
+  Stage 13. It retains nested-extra and details copies; source isolation,
+  invalid-copy classification, allocation savings, and fixed-batch heap
+  observations are recorded above.
+- Item 7's lightweight prompt/profile selection and requirement inspection are
+  implemented and measured in the inspection evidence sections. Production
+  compiled rendering and assembled offline preparation/execution benchmarks
+  are also maintained and recorded.
+
+The canonical runner document describes the new snapshot ownership mechanics.
+The source/validation and model-client documents remain consistent with their
+implemented flows; no package responsibility, public API, or format semantics
+changed. This plan remains the implementation record, and the performance
+roadmap's status now reflects completion rather than proposed work.
+
+Final verification passed on the Stage 13 code: `go test -race -vet=off
+-mod=readonly ./...`, `go vet -mod=readonly ./...`, and
+`python3 scripts/check-examples.py` (prepare, run, observe). The changed Go
+files were `gofmt`-clean, and changed-file Markdown local targets were checked
+separately. These checks are local correctness and documentation validation;
+they do not add a release gate or imply provider-latency improvement.
+
 ## Open Questions
 
 No consumer-policy decisions remain open. File reservation and encoding error
-handling have concrete approaches above. The prepared-copy candidate is
+handling have concrete approaches above. The prepared-copy candidate was
-deliberately conditional on accepted evidence/ownership criteria, with a
+evaluated and retained under the documented ownership and evidence criteria.
-defined retain-current-design outcome; it needs technical verification, not a
+No implementation-scope questions remain open.
-new consumer contract or a stronger ownership guarantee.

docs/roadmap/performance.md

@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
 # Computational Efficiency Improvements
 
-Status: Accepted scope following review. The ConfigKit request (item 1) is
+Status: Complete (2026-10-09). The ConfigKit request (item 1) was submitted,
-complete; local performance implementation has not started.
+and local items 2–7 were implemented or completed with the evidence and
+conditional ownership decision recorded in the
+[implementation plan](implementation.md). No dependency upgrade or public
+performance guarantee was part of this work.
 
 ## Purpose