Add roadmap documents for the initial architecture
This commit is contained in:
174
docs/roadmap/documentation.md
Normal file
174
docs/roadmap/documentation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
|
||||
# Documentation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
This document captures planned documentation decisions for Notarius. It records
|
||||
policy choices while the application architecture is still being shaped. It does
|
||||
not describe implemented behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Notarius documentation should make three boundaries obvious:
|
||||
|
||||
- source-format support belongs to input adapters;
|
||||
- extraction-domain behavior belongs to extractor packages;
|
||||
- core framework behavior is source-agnostic and domain-agnostic.
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation should avoid making the MVP look more transcript-specific or
|
||||
D&D-specific than the architecture intends.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Policy Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Planned Work Stays In Roadmap Docs
|
||||
|
||||
Until code exists, planned behavior belongs under `docs/roadmap/`.
|
||||
|
||||
Implemented behavior should later move into canonical docs. Roadmap files may
|
||||
then link to those docs or be reduced to remaining future work.
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Docs Should Use Generic Terms
|
||||
|
||||
Core architecture docs should prefer:
|
||||
|
||||
- source document;
|
||||
- source unit;
|
||||
- source reference;
|
||||
- input adapter;
|
||||
- extractor;
|
||||
- artifact;
|
||||
- validator;
|
||||
- run manifest.
|
||||
|
||||
Core docs should avoid transcript-specific terms such as segment, speaker,
|
||||
timestamp, and transcript range unless discussing an input adapter or an example.
|
||||
|
||||
Core docs should avoid D&D-specific terms such as spell, NPC, item, combat, and
|
||||
encounter unless discussing extractor packages or examples.
|
||||
|
||||
### Adapter Docs Own Source Formats
|
||||
|
||||
Each implemented input adapter should have a canonical integration document.
|
||||
|
||||
Likely future files:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
docs/integrations/seriatim-transcript.md
|
||||
docs/integrations/markdown-source.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Adapter docs should cover:
|
||||
|
||||
- accepted external schema or file shape;
|
||||
- mapping into `SourceDocument` and `SourceUnit`;
|
||||
- metadata preserved by the adapter;
|
||||
- validation rules and failure behavior;
|
||||
- examples.
|
||||
|
||||
The Seriatim adapter doc should reference the Seriatim schema it supports and
|
||||
explain how transcript segment IDs become source-unit IDs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Extractor Docs Own Domains
|
||||
|
||||
Each implemented extractor family should have canonical internal or integration
|
||||
docs.
|
||||
|
||||
Likely future files:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
docs/internal/extractors.md
|
||||
docs/integrations/artifacts-dnd.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Extractor docs should cover:
|
||||
|
||||
- extractor key;
|
||||
- artifact type;
|
||||
- schema version;
|
||||
- required source-reference behavior;
|
||||
- validator chain;
|
||||
- prompt and response-schema ownership;
|
||||
- examples.
|
||||
|
||||
D&D concepts should be documented in D&D extractor docs, not in generic runner
|
||||
or framework docs.
|
||||
|
||||
### CLI Docs Should Reflect Extensibility
|
||||
|
||||
The CLI reference should present input adapters and extractors as selectable
|
||||
components.
|
||||
|
||||
Provisional command shape:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
notarius extract ./source.json --input seriatim --extractors dnd.spells --output ./artifacts.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Once implemented, `docs/cli.md` should document:
|
||||
|
||||
- positional source input path;
|
||||
- input adapter selection;
|
||||
- extractor selection;
|
||||
- config path behavior;
|
||||
- output path behavior;
|
||||
- diagnostics and report behavior;
|
||||
- exit codes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Config Docs Should Separate Framework And Plugin-Like Options
|
||||
|
||||
`docs/config.md` should group fields by responsibility:
|
||||
|
||||
- input adapter selection and adapter-specific options;
|
||||
- extractor selection and extractor-specific options;
|
||||
- LLM runtime;
|
||||
- validation runtime;
|
||||
- source chunking;
|
||||
- output and diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
Adapter-specific and extractor-specific config should not leak into unrelated
|
||||
core config sections.
|
||||
|
||||
### Examples Should Stay Real
|
||||
|
||||
Examples should be added only when the matching behavior exists and should be
|
||||
covered by tests where practical.
|
||||
|
||||
Likely future examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
examples/seriatim-minimal-transcript.json
|
||||
examples/minimal-config.yml
|
||||
examples/dnd-spells.artifacts.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Examples should be secret-free and should use the same command shapes documented
|
||||
in `docs/cli.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Canonical Documentation Targets
|
||||
|
||||
When the first vertical slice is implemented, add or update:
|
||||
|
||||
- `README.md`: concise purpose, shortest useful command, links.
|
||||
- `docs/cli.md`: implemented command behavior.
|
||||
- `docs/config.md`: implemented config behavior.
|
||||
- `docs/operations.md`: diagnostics, retention, failure inspection.
|
||||
- `docs/troubleshooting.md`: common failures.
|
||||
- `docs/internal/overview.md`: implemented package map.
|
||||
- `docs/internal/pipeline.md`: implemented extraction flow.
|
||||
- `docs/internal/adapters.md`: adapter contract and implemented adapters.
|
||||
- `docs/internal/extractors.md`: extractor contract and built-ins.
|
||||
- `docs/internal/validators.md`: validator contract and built-ins.
|
||||
- `docs/integrations/seriatim-transcript.md`: Seriatim input contract.
|
||||
- `docs/integrations/artifacts.md`: output artifact envelope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Checklist For Future Documentation Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Before merging docs, check:
|
||||
|
||||
- Does the document describe implemented behavior outside `docs/roadmap/`?
|
||||
- Are source-format details isolated to adapter docs?
|
||||
- Are D&D details isolated to extractor or artifact docs?
|
||||
- Is there one canonical home for the topic?
|
||||
- Do command examples match implemented CLI syntax?
|
||||
- Are examples valid, maintained, and free of secrets?
|
||||
- Did any architecture, config, CLI, adapter, extractor, validator, or artifact
|
||||
contract change require a docs update?
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user