Improve D&D validation reliability

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-29 01:24:45 +00:00
parent 4da9360d74
commit 917d150279
55 changed files with 1300 additions and 565 deletions

View File

@@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ import (
)
const (
Key = "normalize/dnd/item-registry/identity"
ReasonCode = "invalid_item_identity"
policy = domainidentity.Policy
Key = "normalize/dnd/item-registry/identity"
ReasonCode = "invalid_item_identity"
policy = domainidentity.Policy
correctionPolicy = "dnd.item_registry.validator.identity.v2"
)
type Options struct{}
@@ -31,7 +32,7 @@ func (v *Validator) ExecutionClass() contracts.ExecutionClass {
return contracts.ExecutionClassDeterministic
}
func (v *Validator) CheckpointFingerprints() []pipeline.CheckpointFingerprint {
return []pipeline.CheckpointFingerprint{{Name: "policy", Value: policy}}
return []pipeline.CheckpointFingerprint{{Name: "policy", Value: policy}, {Name: "correction_policy", Value: correctionPolicy}}
}
func (v *Validator) Validate(_ context.Context, req contracts.TypedValidationRequest[dnd.ItemRegistry]) (contracts.ValidationResult, error) {
@@ -43,10 +44,31 @@ func (v *Validator) Validate(_ context.Context, req contracts.TypedValidationReq
return contracts.ValidationResult{Approved: true}, nil
}
issues := make([]string, len(identityIssues))
var corrections diagnostics.Corrections
for index, issue := range identityIssues {
issues[index] = fmt.Sprintf("items[%d] %s: %s", issue.RecordIndex, issue.Code, diagnostics.Quote(issue.Value))
if issue.RecordIndex < 0 || issue.RecordIndex >= len(req.Value.Items) {
continue
}
item := req.Value.Items[issue.RecordIndex]
corrections.Add(string(issue.Code), itemIdentityCorrection(issue.Code), fmt.Sprintf("Affected item %s %s.", diagnostics.Quote(item.Name), diagnostics.SourceRange(item.SourceRefs)))
}
return contracts.ValidationResult{Approved: false, ReasonCode: ReasonCode, Message: diagnostics.Aggregate("invalid item identity", issues), CorrectionGuidance: corrections.Guidance("Correct the duplicate-group proposals and return the complete replacement proposal response")}, nil
}
func itemIdentityCorrection(code domainidentity.IssueCode) string {
switch code {
case domainidentity.IssueEmptyCanonicalName:
return "Select a canonical proposal member with a nonblank, transcript-supported item name."
case domainidentity.IssueDuplicateCanonical:
return "Put duplicate mentions of the same item in one proposal group and select one transcript-supported canonical member."
case domainidentity.IssueInvalidID, domainidentity.IssueIDMismatch:
return "Revise the proposal so its canonical item member has a valid transcript-supported name; Notarius derives durable identity without model input."
case domainidentity.IssueDuplicateID:
return "Do not use proposals that collapse distinct items into one canonical identity; group only records that describe the same item."
default:
return "Revise the duplicate-group proposal so every canonical item is transcript-supported and distinct."
}
return contracts.ValidationResult{Approved: false, ReasonCode: ReasonCode, Message: diagnostics.Aggregate("invalid item identity", issues), CorrectionGuidance: "Return one canonical registry entry per distinct properly named item, combining duplicate mentions under the same transcript-supported name."}, nil
}
func Spec() pipeline.ValidatorSpec {