Clarify semantic reconciliation candidate numbers

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-29 03:16:24 +00:00
parent 917d150279
commit 7e626753bf
30 changed files with 572 additions and 196 deletions

View File

@@ -266,13 +266,16 @@ proposal to reconcile identity groups.
The three registry normalizers instantiate the domain-neutral
`internal/framework/semanticreconcile` engine with default bounds. Each
eligible candidate receives a contiguous, one-based `candidate_id` for that
request. The model sees that handle, the candidate label and source-free
evidence ranges, plus bounded transcript windows; it returns only duplicate
eligible candidate receives a contiguous, one-based `candidate_number` for that
request, and candidate material declares the exact inclusive range. The model
sees that handle, the candidate label and source-free evidence ranges, plus
bounded transcript windows; it returns only duplicate
groups of supplied handles and one supplied canonical handle per group. It
never returns names, evidence, durable IDs, or replacement records. Identical
labels and evidence remain independently selectable because their handles are
distinct.
distinct. Transcript unit `id` values and evidence `start_unit_id` and
`end_unit_id` values are source positions in a separate namespace and are
never valid candidate numbers.
The generic core owns the mandatory handle protocol, candidate and transcript
presentation, the private response schema, source-reference validation,

View File

@@ -95,19 +95,24 @@ source-backed artifact-family normalizer projects its deterministic records
into contextual candidates and owned typed record envelopes, supplies its
chosen prompt identity and resolved LLM profile, and constructs an engine with
explicit limits. The core filters invalid evidence, assigns contiguous
request-local integer handles, renders bounded candidate and transcript
materials, invokes the structured-completion boundary, and assesses the
returned duplicate groups into a stable non-overlapping plan.
one-based request-local candidate numbers, renders bounded candidate and
transcript materials, invokes the structured-completion boundary, and assesses
the returned duplicate groups into a stable non-overlapping plan. Candidate
material declares the exact inclusive number range for the request. Transcript
unit IDs and evidence range endpoints remain source positions in a separate
namespace and are never valid candidate numbers.
The normalizer then applies that plan through a typed `ApplicationPolicy`. The
core preserves ungrouped records, contribution order, and provenance while the
artifact family owns group guards, field and evidence consolidation, durable
ID derivation, retry and fallback presentation, classified diagnostics, and postconditions.
Request-local handles do not enter the typed value or durable artifact. Fewer
than two eligible candidates skips model invocation; exceeding a candidate or
combined-material bound preserves the deterministic result under the family's
fallback policy. Provider, transport, cancellation, and context-construction
failures remain execution errors.
ID derivation, retry and fallback presentation, classified diagnostics, and
postconditions.
These candidate numbers are the concrete private representation of ADR-0013's
request-local handles; they do not enter the typed value or durable artifact.
Fewer than two eligible candidates skips model invocation; exceeding a
candidate or combined-material bound preserves the deterministic result under
the family's fallback policy. Provider, transport, cancellation, and
context-construction failures remain execution errors.
When the engine actually makes a proposal call, its typed result carries the
owned exact proposal response under the same correction contract as other