Complete the semantic reconciliation roadmap
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
||||
Use the supplied positive integer candidate IDs and their cited transcript
|
||||
windows only to determine whether candidates identify the same item type or
|
||||
unique designation. Do not treat nearby evidence, similar objects, or a shared
|
||||
owner as sufficient. Keep currency denominations, materially different item
|
||||
types, and uncertain aliases separate. Do not infer an item property or
|
||||
uniqueness.
|
||||
Determine whether candidates identify the same item type or unique designation
|
||||
using their contextual labels and cited transcript windows. Do not treat nearby
|
||||
evidence, similar objects, or a shared owner as sufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
Keep currency denominations and materially different item types separate. Keep
|
||||
uncertain aliases separate. Do not infer an item property or uniqueness.
|
||||
|
||||
When selecting a canonical display name, choose one supplied candidate name
|
||||
that is the clearest established designation.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user