Complete the semantic reconciliation roadmap

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-09 18:30:32 +00:00
parent e95e2f2220
commit 67338798aa
14 changed files with 187 additions and 1283 deletions

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Use the supplied positive integer candidate IDs and their cited transcript
windows only to determine whether candidates identify the same item type or
unique designation. Do not treat nearby evidence, similar objects, or a shared
owner as sufficient. Keep currency denominations, materially different item
types, and uncertain aliases separate. Do not infer an item property or
uniqueness.
Determine whether candidates identify the same item type or unique designation
using their contextual labels and cited transcript windows. Do not treat nearby
evidence, similar objects, or a shared owner as sufficient.
Keep currency denominations and materially different item types separate. Keep
uncertain aliases separate. Do not infer an item property or uniqueness.
When selecting a canonical display name, choose one supplied candidate name
that is the clearest established designation.

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
Use the supplied positive integer candidate IDs and their cited transcript
windows to determine whether candidates identify the same physical place. Do
not treat matching names, nearby evidence, nested places, or generic labels as
sufficient. Keep parent and child places, similarly named places, and uncertain
aliases separate.
Determine whether candidates identify the same physical place using their
contextual labels and cited transcript windows. Do not treat matching names,
nearby evidence, nested places, or generic labels as sufficient.
Keep parent and child places separate, as well as similarly named places and
uncertain aliases.
When selecting a canonical display name, prefer the clearest established name.

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Use the supplied positive integer candidate IDs and their cited transcript
windows to determine whether candidates refer to the same individual. Preserve
distinct individuals even when their names are similar or their contextual
descriptions are identical.
Determine whether candidates refer to the same individual using their
contextual labels and cited transcript windows. Preserve distinct individuals
even when their names are similar or their contextual descriptions are
identical.
When selecting a canonical display name, prefer a complete, stable proper name
over an abbreviation. Prefer an unadorned proper name over that name plus a