Clarify hypothetical location occurrence classification

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-04 13:09:30 +00:00
parent d1f43df88e
commit 55b188fd84
3 changed files with 18 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -56,10 +56,14 @@ positive and the start may not follow the end.
| `visited` | The transcript establishes physical party presence, including arrival, continuing presence, or departure. |
| `planned` | The party explicitly proposes, intends, or agrees to future travel; speculation alone is not enough. |
| `recalled` | The transcript explicitly recounts prior party presence before the current live events. |
| `mentioned` | The location is explicit but no stronger category applies, including lore, directions, third-party activity, or out-of-character discussion. |
| `mentioned` | The location is explicit but no stronger category applies, including lore, directions, third-party activity, non-actionable speculation, a mere hypothetical reference, or out-of-character discussion. |
For overlapping evidence, precedence is `visited`, then `planned`, then
`recalled`, then `mentioned`. Inferred locations are omitted. Normalization
`recalled`, then `mentioned`. For example, “What if we went to Moon Gate?” is
eligible as `mentioned` when its narrow evidence explicitly references that
registry location, but it is not `planned` without an actual proposal,
intention, or agreement to travel. Inferred, unstated, uncertain, and
unsupported places or occurrences are omitted. Normalization
canonicalizes the registry name, orders and deduplicates source references, and
orders occurrences by source chronology, location ID, name, kind, and reference
sequence. It collapses only exact duplicates with the same ID, kind, and