Clarify hypothetical location occurrence classification
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,10 +56,14 @@ positive and the start may not follow the end.
|
||||
| `visited` | The transcript establishes physical party presence, including arrival, continuing presence, or departure. |
|
||||
| `planned` | The party explicitly proposes, intends, or agrees to future travel; speculation alone is not enough. |
|
||||
| `recalled` | The transcript explicitly recounts prior party presence before the current live events. |
|
||||
| `mentioned` | The location is explicit but no stronger category applies, including lore, directions, third-party activity, or out-of-character discussion. |
|
||||
| `mentioned` | The location is explicit but no stronger category applies, including lore, directions, third-party activity, non-actionable speculation, a mere hypothetical reference, or out-of-character discussion. |
|
||||
|
||||
For overlapping evidence, precedence is `visited`, then `planned`, then
|
||||
`recalled`, then `mentioned`. Inferred locations are omitted. Normalization
|
||||
`recalled`, then `mentioned`. For example, “What if we went to Moon Gate?” is
|
||||
eligible as `mentioned` when its narrow evidence explicitly references that
|
||||
registry location, but it is not `planned` without an actual proposal,
|
||||
intention, or agreement to travel. Inferred, unstated, uncertain, and
|
||||
unsupported places or occurrences are omitted. Normalization
|
||||
canonicalizes the registry name, orders and deduplicates source references, and
|
||||
orders occurrences by source chronology, location ID, name, kind, and reference
|
||||
sequence. It collapses only exact duplicates with the same ID, kind, and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user