Improve semantic reconciliation retries

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-28 18:25:00 +00:00
parent 5cab4e512e
commit 4da9360d74
25 changed files with 771 additions and 69 deletions

View File

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ const (
Key = "dnd/npc-registry"
PromptID = "dnd.npc_registry.normalize"
PromptVersion = "v1"
normalizationPolicy = "dnd.npc_registry.normalize.v5"
normalizationPolicy = "dnd.npc_registry.normalize.v6"
NormalizationPolicy = normalizationPolicy
ReasonCodeNPCFieldsNormalized = "npc_fields_normalized"
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ func (n *Normalizer) Normalize(ctx context.Context, req contracts.TypedNormalize
case semanticreconcile.SkippedInsufficientCandidates:
return normalizationResult(deterministic, findings, nil)
case semanticreconcile.SkippedLimitExceeded:
return fallbackResult(deterministic, findings, semanticFallbackFinding(-1))
return fallbackResult(deterministic, findings, semanticFallbackFinding(-1, "the candidate set exceeded the configured semantic-reconciliation limits"))
case semanticreconcile.RetryableInvalidStructuredOutput:
return n.invalidStructuredResult(deterministic, findings)
case semanticreconcile.Complete, semanticreconcile.RetryableDiscardedProposalGroups:
@@ -148,17 +148,29 @@ func (n *Normalizer) Normalize(ctx context.Context, req contracts.TypedNormalize
}
func (n *Normalizer) invalidStructuredResult(value dnd.NPCRegistry, findings []diagnostics.Finding) (contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry], error) {
return retryResultWithFallback(value, findings, nil, "semantic proposal requires retry: invalid structured output", semanticFallbackFinding(-1))
return retryResultWithFallback(value, findings, nil, "", "semantic proposal requires retry: invalid structured output", semanticFallbackFinding(-1, "the final model response did not satisfy the structured-output contract"))
}
func retryResult(value dnd.NPCRegistry, findings []diagnostics.Finding, reconciliation semanticreconcile.Result) (contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry], error) {
return retryResultWithFallback(value, findings, reconciliation.ModelCandidate(), diagnostics.Aggregate("semantic proposal requires retry", semanticreconcile.IssueDetails(reconciliation.Issues())), semanticFallbackFinding(reconciliation.DiscardedGroupCount()))
issues := reconciliation.Issues()
correctionDetails, err := semanticreconcile.CorrectionDetails(issues)
if err != nil {
return contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry]{}, normalizerErrorf("build semantic correction details: %w", err)
}
correctionGuidance, err := semanticreconcile.CorrectionGuidance(issues)
if err != nil {
return contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry]{}, normalizerErrorf("build semantic correction guidance: %w", err)
}
return retryResultWithFallback(value, findings, reconciliation.ModelCandidate(), correctionGuidance, diagnostics.Aggregate("semantic proposal requires retry", semanticreconcile.IssueDetails(issues)), semanticFallbackFinding(reconciliation.DiscardedGroupCount(), correctionDetails...))
}
func semanticFallbackFinding(discardedGroups int) diagnostics.Finding {
message := "semantic proposal could not be applied"
func semanticFallbackFinding(discardedGroups int, details ...string) diagnostics.Finding {
message := "semantic reconciliation could not be completed; all affected candidates were preserved separately"
if discardedGroups >= 0 {
message = fmt.Sprintf("%d proposal group(s) omitted after semantic proposal retry exhaustion", discardedGroups)
message = fmt.Sprintf("%d proposal group(s) omitted from the final semantic proposal; all affected candidates were preserved separately", discardedGroups)
}
if len(details) > 0 {
message = diagnostics.Aggregate(message, details)
}
return diagnostics.Finding{Scope: "npcs", ReasonCode: ReasonCodeNPCSemanticReconciliationExhausted, Message: message}
}
@@ -184,7 +196,7 @@ func fallbackResult(value dnd.NPCRegistry, findings []diagnostics.Finding, fallb
return result, nil
}
func retryResultWithFallback(value dnd.NPCRegistry, findings []diagnostics.Finding, candidate *contracts.ModelCandidate, message string, fallback diagnostics.Finding) (contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry], error) {
func retryResultWithFallback(value dnd.NPCRegistry, findings []diagnostics.Finding, candidate *contracts.ModelCandidate, correctionGuidance, message string, fallback diagnostics.Finding) (contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry], error) {
result, err := normalizationResult(value, findings, candidate)
if err != nil {
return contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry]{}, err
@@ -193,7 +205,7 @@ func retryResultWithFallback(value dnd.NPCRegistry, findings []diagnostics.Findi
if err != nil {
return contracts.TypedNormalizeResult[dnd.NPCRegistry]{}, normalizerErrorf("collect fallback diagnostic: %w", err)
}
result.Retry = &contracts.NormalizeRetry{ReasonCode: ReasonCodeNPCSemanticProposalInvalid, Message: message, FallbackDiagnostics: fallbackGroups}
result.Retry = &contracts.NormalizeRetry{ReasonCode: ReasonCodeNPCSemanticProposalInvalid, Message: message, CorrectionGuidance: correctionGuidance, FallbackDiagnostics: fallbackGroups}
return result, nil
}

View File

@@ -115,10 +115,13 @@ func TestNormalizeUnsafeProposalReturnsSafeRetryFallback(t *testing.T) {
if result.Retry.ReasonCode != ReasonCodeNPCSemanticProposalInvalid || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.Message, "group 1: member_unknown") {
t.Fatalf("retry = %#v, want bounded invalid-proposal diagnostics", result.Retry)
}
if !strings.Contains(result.Retry.CorrectionGuidance, "Duplicate group 2") || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.CorrectionGuidance, "supplied candidate list") || strings.Contains(result.Retry.CorrectionGuidance, "member_unknown") || strings.Contains(result.Retry.CorrectionGuidance, ReasonCodeNPCSemanticProposalInvalid) {
t.Fatalf("correction guidance = %q, want contextual prose without internal labels", result.Retry.CorrectionGuidance)
}
if len(result.Value.NPCs) != 2 || result.Value.NPCs[0].Name != "Mira Thorn" || result.Value.NPCs[1].Name != "Captain Vale" {
t.Fatalf("fallback NPCs = %#v, want independently safe group applied", result.Value.NPCs)
}
if len(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics) != 1 || result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].ReasonCode != ReasonCodeNPCSemanticReconciliationExhausted || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].Samples[0].Message, "1 proposal group") {
if len(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics) != 1 || result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].ReasonCode != ReasonCodeNPCSemanticReconciliationExhausted || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].Samples[0].Message, "1 proposal group") || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].Samples[0].Message, "preserved separately") || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].Samples[0].Message, "supplied candidate list") {
t.Fatalf("fallback diagnostics = %#v, want exact omitted-group warning", result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics)
}
}
@@ -134,6 +137,9 @@ func TestNormalizeInvalidStructuredOutputAndOperationalErrorsRemainDistinct(t *t
if err != nil || result.Retry == nil || result.Retry.ReasonCode != ReasonCodeNPCSemanticProposalInvalid || len(result.Value.NPCs) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("invalid structured result = %#v, %v; want deterministic retry fallback", result, err)
}
if result.Retry.CorrectionGuidance != "" || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].Samples[0].Message, "structured-output contract") || !strings.Contains(result.Retry.FallbackDiagnostics[0].Samples[0].Message, "preserved separately") {
t.Fatalf("invalid structured retry = %#v, want feedback-free retry and informative fallback", result.Retry)
}
operational := errors.New("provider unavailable")
if _, err := newNormalizer(t, &recordingNPCNormalizerClient{err: operational}).Normalize(context.Background(), normalizeRequestWithSource(input, doc)); !errors.Is(err, operational) || errors.Is(err, contracts.ErrInvalidStructuredOutput) {
t.Fatalf("operational completion error = %v, want ordinary error", err)