Document workload-oriented LLM profile deployment

docs/adr/0010-workload-oriented-llm-profile-defaults.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# ADR-0010: Use workload-oriented LLM profile defaults
+
+**Status:** Accepted
+**Date:** 2026-08-03
+
+## Context
+
+LLM-backed D&D operations share an execution-policy choice, but repeating a
+provider or model-named profile on every module binding ties pipeline structure
+to a deployment decision. Different environments may require different model,
+backend, timeout, or reasoning settings while retaining the same workload.
+
+Notarius also needs a usable default for maintained D&D prompts without making
+an operator profile mandatory. That default must remain owned by the D&D
+family, while generic LLM infrastructure stays unaware of domain-specific
+policy.
+
+## Decision
+
+Pipelines may name one workload-oriented default profile, inherited only by
+selected LLM-backed bindings and validators. Binding-level profile IDs remain
+intentional exceptions, and the run-wide CLI profile override has highest
+precedence.
+
+The D&D family owns an embedded fallback profile named `dnd-extraction`.
+Operators may provide a complete profile with the same ID through a PromptKit
+filesystem source. PromptKit selects the higher-precedence matching definition;
+Notarius does not merge profile documents. Production, development, and local
+deployments can therefore use different execution policy behind one unchanged
+pipeline ID.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+- Repeat a model-named profile on every binding. This makes routine deployment
+  policy changes noisy and obscures the shared workload intent.
+- Require every deployment to install a profile file. This adds configuration
+  friction and leaves maintained D&D prompts without an application-owned
+  fallback.
+- Put D&D profile policy in generic LLM infrastructure. This breaks domain
+  ownership and makes generic code depend on one workload.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Pipeline configuration expresses workload intent rather than a specific
+provider or model. Operators can replace the complete execution policy without
+editing bindings, while binding-level and run-wide exceptions remain available.
+Profile changes affect resolved pipeline and checkpoint identity, so they may
+intentionally cause work to be recomputed. The D&D fallback becomes a
+maintained application execution-policy asset.