Fix deletion conflict accounting coverage

docs/roadmap/remediation.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 **Scope:** The four implementation commits after `31979d4`, compared with
 [span-deletion.md](span-deletion.md), [implementation.md](implementation.md),
 the agreed user intent, and repository policies.
-**Status:** R15 open. Earlier findings R1–R14 are resolved; their evidence and
+**Status:** R15 addressed; see the resolution record below. Earlier findings R1–R14 are resolved; their evidence and
 resolution records remain in Git history through `24b8992`.
 
 ## Architecture Assessment
@@ -71,3 +71,15 @@ test rather than adding overlapping coverage.
   behavior, not a guarantee that a model will always propose or approve good edits.
 - This review records remediation only; it does not implement the test correction
   or any deferred feature.
+
+## Resolution Record
+
+**R15:** Updated the existing conflict test to use `outcomeModule` with a successful
+proposal operation. The test requires that operation to be present and checks for
+absent failure reasons, recovery reasons, and filtered-proposal records, while
+retaining the final-text and skipped-decision assertions. Production code is unchanged.
+
+Validation: `go test ./internal/framework/runner` passed. Repeating the temporary
+overlay experiment now fails at the accounting assertion with an erroneous
+`proposals_filtered` recovery for the second deletion, confirming that the test
+detects the intended regression. The overlay did not modify repository source.