Make module-stage LLM handling resilient and report warnings
This commit is contained in:
@@ -248,29 +248,38 @@ func TestLLMBackedValidatorApprovalAndRejection(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorMalformedOutputFails(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorMalformedOutputRejectsBatch(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{err: errors.New("malformed structured output")}
|
||||
v, _ := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility, "test-model")
|
||||
req := makeReq([]proposals.EnrichedCorrectionProposal{mk(0, "gestures", "Jesters")})
|
||||
req.LLMClient = client
|
||||
_, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "completion failed") {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected malformed output error, got %v", err)
|
||||
res, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected malformed output downgrade, got %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Decisions) != 1 || res.Decisions[0].Approved || res.Decisions[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorMalformed {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unexpected decisions: %+v", res.Decisions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Warnings) != 1 || res.Warnings[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorMalformed {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected malformed warning, got %+v", res.Warnings)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorMissingDecisionFails(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorMissingDecisionRejectsBatch(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{}}}}
|
||||
v, _ := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility, "test-model")
|
||||
req := makeReq([]proposals.EnrichedCorrectionProposal{mk(0, "gestures", "Jesters")})
|
||||
req.LLMClient = client
|
||||
_, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "response invalid") {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected missing decision error, got %v", err)
|
||||
res, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected missing decision downgrade, got %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Decisions) != 1 || res.Decisions[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorMalformed {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unexpected decisions: %+v", res.Decisions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorDuplicateDecisionFails(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorDuplicateDecisionRejectsBatch(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 0, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "ok"},
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 0, Approved: false, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "dup"},
|
||||
@@ -278,20 +287,74 @@ func TestLLMBackedValidatorDuplicateDecisionFails(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
v, _ := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility, "test-model")
|
||||
req := makeReq([]proposals.EnrichedCorrectionProposal{mk(0, "gestures", "Jesters")})
|
||||
req.LLMClient = client
|
||||
_, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "duplicate") {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected duplicate decision error, got %v", err)
|
||||
res, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected duplicate decision downgrade, got %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Decisions) != 1 || res.Decisions[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorMalformed {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unexpected decisions: %+v", res.Decisions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorUnknownProposalIndexFails(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorUnknownProposalIndexRejectsBatch(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{{CorrectionIndex: 99, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "unknown"}}}}}
|
||||
v, _ := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility, "test-model")
|
||||
req := makeReq([]proposals.EnrichedCorrectionProposal{mk(0, "gestures", "Jesters")})
|
||||
req.LLMClient = client
|
||||
_, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "unknown") {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected unknown index error, got %v", err)
|
||||
res, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected unknown index downgrade, got %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Decisions) != 1 || res.Decisions[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorMalformed {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unexpected decisions: %+v", res.Decisions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorOversizedSingleProposalRejectsOnlyThatProposal(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 1, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "ok"},
|
||||
}}}}
|
||||
v, _ := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility, "test-model")
|
||||
huge := strings.Repeat("gestures ", 200)
|
||||
req := Request{
|
||||
WorkingTranscript: &schema.Transcript{Segments: []schema.Segment{
|
||||
{ID: 1, Text: huge},
|
||||
{ID: 2, Text: "There were gestures at the temple.", Categories: []string{"narration"}},
|
||||
}},
|
||||
CandidateProposal: []proposals.EnrichedCorrectionProposal{
|
||||
{
|
||||
CorrectionProposal: proposals.CorrectionProposal{TargetSegmentID: 1, OriginalText: huge, CorrectedText: "Jesters", Confidence: 0.9},
|
||||
ProposalMetadata: proposals.ProposalMetadata{ProposalIndex: 0, ModuleKey: "homophones", ModuleInstance: "homophones"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
CorrectionProposal: proposals.CorrectionProposal{TargetSegmentID: 2, OriginalText: "gestures", CorrectedText: "Jesters", Confidence: 0.9},
|
||||
ProposalMetadata: proposals.ProposalMetadata{ProposalIndex: 1, ModuleKey: "homophones", ModuleInstance: "homophones"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
ModuleKey: "homophones",
|
||||
ModuleInstance: "homophones",
|
||||
ReplacementPolicy: proposals.ReplacementPolicyRequireUnique,
|
||||
}
|
||||
req.LLMClient = client
|
||||
cfg := config.Default()
|
||||
cfg.ValidationMaxPromptTokens = 200
|
||||
req.Config = &cfg
|
||||
|
||||
res, err := v.Validate(context.Background(), req)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected oversize downgrade, got %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Decisions) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected two decisions, got %+v", res.Decisions)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if res.Decisions[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorInputTooLarge || res.Decisions[0].Approved {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected first decision oversize rejection, got %+v", res.Decisions[0])
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !res.Decisions[1].Approved {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected second decision approved, got %+v", res.Decisions[1])
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(res.Warnings) != 1 || res.Warnings[0].ReasonCode != ReasonValidatorInputTooLarge {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected one oversize warning, got %+v", res.Warnings)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user