Replaced the stub LLM-based validator class with two real LLM-based validator implementations

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-24 11:52:22 -05:00
parent bca2152971
commit 34b3c09e43
14 changed files with 918 additions and 99 deletions

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
from audita.core.config import AuditaConfig
from audita.core.errors import AuditaLLMError
from audita.core.schemas import parse_glossary_yaml, parse_transcript_json
from audita.framework.models import CorrectionProposal, ModuleContext, ModuleRunSpec
from audita.framework.runner import PipelineRunner
from audita.validators import ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator
from audita.validators import MeaningReversalValidator, ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator, SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator
from audita.validators.base import ValidationContext, ValidationDecision, ValidationResult
@@ -34,6 +35,25 @@ class RecordingLLMValidator(RecordingValidator):
execution_kind = "llm"
class FakeStructuredLLMClient:
def __init__(self, responses):
self._responses = list(responses)
self.calls = []
def run_structured(self, *, stage_name, messages, response_model, config):
self.calls.append(
{
"stage_name": stage_name,
"messages": list(messages),
"response_model": response_model,
}
)
if not self._responses:
raise AuditaLLMError("FakeStructuredLLMClient received more calls than expected.")
payload = self._responses.pop(0)
return response_model.model_validate(payload)
class RecordingModule:
replacement_policy = "require_unique"
@@ -227,6 +247,89 @@ def test_pipeline_runner_supports_deterministic_and_llm_validators_in_one_chain(
]
def test_pipeline_runner_supports_real_llm_validators_in_one_chain(tmp_path):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""
[
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "There were gestures at the dam."}
]
"""
)
glossary = parse_glossary_yaml(
"""
glossary:
- name: "Jesters"
category: faction
summary: "The Jesters are a faction."
"""
)
module = RecordingModule(
"mixed_real",
[
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=0,
module_instance="mixed_real",
module_key="glossary",
id=1,
original_text="gestures",
corrected_text="Jesters",
confidence=0.9,
)
],
[
ProtectedGlossaryTermsValidator("protected_glossary_guard"),
SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review"),
MeaningReversalValidator("meaning_reversal_review"),
],
[],
)
llm_client = FakeStructuredLLMClient(
[
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.95,
"reason": "Likely phonetic mistranscription in context.",
}
]
},
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.98,
"reason": "Does not reverse the segment meaning.",
}
]
},
]
)
runner = PipelineRunner()
result = runner.run(
transcript=transcript,
glossary=glossary,
module_specs=[ModuleRunSpec(instance_name="mixed_real", module_key="glossary", module=module)],
config=AuditaConfig.from_sources(env={"OPENROUTER_API_KEY": "test-key"}),
run_dir=tmp_path / "run",
llm_client=llm_client,
)
assert result.transcript[0].text == "There were Jesters at the dam."
assert [report.execution_kind for report in result.module_reports[0].validators] == [
"deterministic",
"llm",
"llm",
]
assert [call["stage_name"] for call in llm_client.calls] == [
"mixed_real:spoken_form_plausibility_review",
"mixed_real:meaning_reversal_review",
]
def test_pipeline_runner_uses_real_protected_glossary_validator(tmp_path):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,453 @@
import pytest
from audita.core.chunking import TokenBatch
from audita.core.config import AuditaConfig
from audita.core.errors import AuditaLLMError
from audita.core.schemas import parse_glossary_yaml, parse_transcript_json
from audita.framework.models import CorrectionProposal, ModuleRunSpec
from audita.validators.base import ValidationContext
from audita.validators.llm import MeaningReversalValidator, SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator
from audita.validators.prompts import (
build_meaning_reversal_messages,
build_spoken_form_plausibility_messages,
)
import audita.validators.llm as llm_module
class _Module:
def __init__(self, replacement_policy: str) -> None:
self.replacement_policy = replacement_policy
class FakeStructuredLLMClient:
def __init__(self, responses):
self._responses = list(responses)
self.calls = []
def run_structured(self, *, stage_name, messages, response_model, config):
self.calls.append(
{
"stage_name": stage_name,
"messages": list(messages),
"response_model": response_model,
}
)
if not self._responses:
raise AuditaLLMError("FakeStructuredLLMClient received more calls than expected.")
return response_model.model_validate(self._responses.pop(0))
def _glossary():
return parse_glossary_yaml(
"""
glossary:
- name: "Jesters"
category: faction
summary: "The Jesters are a faction."
- name: "Hrank"
category: pc
summary: "Hrank is a player character."
- name: "Lyra"
category: npc
summary: "Lyra is an NPC."
"""
)
def _context(
*,
proposals,
transcript,
llm_client,
tmp_path,
replacement_policy="require_unique",
):
return ValidationContext(
proposals=proposals,
transcript=transcript,
glossary=_glossary(),
config=AuditaConfig.from_sources(env={"OPENROUTER_API_KEY": "test-key"}),
run_spec=ModuleRunSpec(
instance_name="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
module=_Module(replacement_policy),
),
run_dir=tmp_path,
llm_client=llm_client,
)
def test_spoken_form_plausibility_validator_approves_plausible_and_rejects_implausible_corrections(tmp_path):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""
[
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "There were gestures at the temple."},
{"id": 2, "speaker": "A", "start": 1.0, "end": 2.0, "text": "Lyra moved first."}
]
"""
)
proposals = [
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=0,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=1,
original_text="gestures",
corrected_text="Jesters",
confidence=0.95,
),
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=1,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=2,
original_text="Lyra",
corrected_text="Jesters",
confidence=0.95,
),
]
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient(
[
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.97,
"reason": "Likely spoken-form correction in context.",
},
{
"correction_index": 1,
"approved": False,
"confidence": 0.99,
"reason": "Not plausibly related by homophone or mistranscription.",
},
]
}
]
)
result = SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review").validate(
_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=client, tmp_path=tmp_path)
)
assert [(decision.proposal_index, decision.approved) for decision in result.decisions] == [
(0, True),
(1, False),
]
prompt_text = client.calls[0]["messages"][1]["content"]
assert '"original_segment_text"' in prompt_text
assert "There were Jesters at the temple." in prompt_text
assert "Lyra moved first." in prompt_text
def test_meaning_reversal_validator_rejects_reversal_and_approves_nonreversal(tmp_path):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""
[
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "ChatGPT still can't really do that with a dam, but Claude actually can."},
{"id": 2, "speaker": "A", "start": 1.0, "end": 2.0, "text": "The figure became visible in the doorway."}
]
"""
)
proposals = [
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=0,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=1,
original_text="dam",
corrected_text="damn",
confidence=0.95,
),
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=1,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=2,
original_text="visible",
corrected_text="invisible",
confidence=0.95,
),
]
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient(
[
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.94,
"reason": "Does not reverse the segment meaning.",
},
{
"correction_index": 1,
"approved": False,
"confidence": 1.0,
"reason": "Changes visible to invisible and reverses the segment meaning.",
},
]
}
]
)
result = MeaningReversalValidator("meaning_reversal_review").validate(
_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=client, tmp_path=tmp_path)
)
assert [(decision.proposal_index, decision.approved) for decision in result.decisions] == [
(0, True),
(1, False),
]
prompt_text = client.calls[0]["messages"][1]["content"]
assert "The figure became visible in the doorway." in prompt_text
assert "The figure became invisible in the doorway." in prompt_text
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("validator", "payload", "message_fragment"),
[
(
SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review"),
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.9,
"reason": "ok",
},
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.9,
"reason": "duplicate",
},
]
},
"duplicate correction_index values",
),
(
MeaningReversalValidator("meaning_reversal_review"),
{"validations": []},
"omitted correction_index values",
),
(
SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review"),
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 99,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.9,
"reason": "unknown",
}
]
},
"unknown correction_index",
),
],
)
def test_llm_validators_reject_bad_correction_indexes(tmp_path, validator, payload, message_fragment):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""
[
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "There were gestures at the temple."}
]
"""
)
proposals = [
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=0,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=1,
original_text="gestures",
corrected_text="Jesters",
confidence=0.95,
)
]
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient([payload])
with pytest.raises(AuditaLLMError, match=message_fragment):
validator.validate(_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=client, tmp_path=tmp_path))
def test_llm_validator_rejects_unpreviewable_proposals_without_calling_llm(tmp_path):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""
[
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "There were gestures at the temple."}
]
"""
)
proposals = [
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=0,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=1,
original_text="rank",
corrected_text="Hrank",
confidence=0.95,
)
]
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient([])
result = SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review").validate(
_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=client, tmp_path=tmp_path)
)
assert result.decisions[0].approved is False
assert result.decisions[0].reason == "proposal original_text does not match segment text"
assert client.calls == []
def test_llm_validator_skips_empty_candidate_sets_without_calling_llm(tmp_path):
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient([])
result = MeaningReversalValidator("meaning_reversal_review").validate(
_context(proposals=[], transcript=[], llm_client=client, tmp_path=tmp_path)
)
assert result.decisions == []
assert client.calls == []
def test_spoken_form_prompt_emphasizes_acoustic_plausibility():
messages = build_spoken_form_plausibility_messages(
[
{
"correction_index": 0,
"id": 1,
"original_segment_text": "There were gestures at the temple.",
"corrected_segment_text": "There were Jesters at the temple.",
"original_text": "gestures",
"corrected_text": "Jesters",
}
]
)
combined = messages[0]["content"] + messages[1]["content"]
assert "homophone" in combined
assert "gestures" in combined
assert "Lyra" in combined
assert '"original_segment_text"' in messages[1]["content"]
def test_meaning_reversal_prompt_emphasizes_antonyms_and_segment_context():
messages = build_meaning_reversal_messages(
[
{
"correction_index": 0,
"id": 1,
"original_segment_text": "The figure became visible in the doorway.",
"corrected_segment_text": "The figure became invisible in the doorway.",
"original_text": "visible",
"corrected_text": "invisible",
}
]
)
combined = messages[0]["content"] + messages[1]["content"]
assert "antonym" in combined
assert "visible" in combined
assert "up" in combined
assert "original_segment_text" in messages[1]["content"]
def test_llm_validators_use_shared_token_batching_helper(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
transcript = parse_transcript_json(
"""
[
{"id": 1, "speaker": "A", "start": 0.0, "end": 1.0, "text": "There were gestures at the temple."},
{"id": 2, "speaker": "A", "start": 1.0, "end": 2.0, "text": "We saw rank near the gate."},
{"id": 3, "speaker": "A", "start": 2.0, "end": 3.0, "text": "ChatGPT still can't do that with a dam."}
]
"""
)
proposals = [
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=0,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=1,
original_text="gestures",
corrected_text="Jesters",
confidence=0.95,
),
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=1,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=2,
original_text="rank",
corrected_text="Hrank",
confidence=0.95,
),
CorrectionProposal(
proposal_index=2,
module_instance="homophones",
module_key="homophones",
id=3,
original_text="dam",
corrected_text="damn",
confidence=0.95,
),
]
client = FakeStructuredLLMClient(
[
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 0,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.9,
"reason": "ok",
}
]
},
{
"validations": [
{
"correction_index": 1,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.9,
"reason": "ok",
},
{
"correction_index": 2,
"approved": True,
"confidence": 0.9,
"reason": "ok",
},
]
},
]
)
chunk_calls = []
def fake_chunk_payload_items(items, max_tokens, payload_fn, empty_error_message):
chunk_calls.append(
{
"max_tokens": max_tokens,
"payloads": [payload_fn(item) for item in items],
"empty_error_message": empty_error_message,
}
)
return [
TokenBatch(batch_index=0, items=list(items[:1]), token_count=1),
TokenBatch(batch_index=1, items=list(items[1:]), token_count=1),
]
monkeypatch.setattr(llm_module, "chunk_payload_items", fake_chunk_payload_items)
result = SpokenFormPlausibilityValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review").validate(
_context(proposals=proposals, transcript=transcript, llm_client=client, tmp_path=tmp_path)
)
assert [decision.approved for decision in result.decisions] == [True, True, True]
assert len(client.calls) == 2
assert len(chunk_calls) == 1
assert chunk_calls[0]["max_tokens"] == AuditaConfig.from_sources(env={"OPENROUTER_API_KEY": "test-key"}).max_section_tokens
assert all("corrected_segment_text" in payload for payload in chunk_calls[0]["payloads"])

View File

@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ def test_process_transcript_result_writes_report_and_preserves_skips_per_policy(
assert (result.run_dir / "normalization" / "summary.json").exists()
assert [validator["name"] for validator in result.report.modules[0].to_dict()["validators"]] == [
"protected_glossary_guard",
"toward_glossary_term_review",
"context_support_review",
"spoken_form_plausibility_review",
"meaning_reversal_review",
]
@@ -97,26 +97,18 @@ def test_default_module_specs_expose_final_validator_order():
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[0].module.validators()] == [
"protected_glossary_guard",
"toward_glossary_term_review",
"context_support_review",
"spoken_form_plausibility_review",
"meaning_reversal_review",
]
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[1].module.validators()] == [
"protected_glossary_guard",
"acoustic_similarity_review",
"contextual_plausibility_review",
"antonym_reversal_review",
"spoken_form_plausibility_review",
"meaning_reversal_review",
]
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[2].module.validators()] == [
"protected_glossary_guard",
"toward_glossary_term_review",
"context_support_review",
]
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[3].module.validators()] == [
"protected_glossary_guard",
"spoken_marker_cleanup_review",
"meaning_preservation_review",
]
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[4].module.validators()] == [
"protected_glossary_guard",
"edited_text_readability_review",
"spoken_form_plausibility_review",
"meaning_reversal_review",
]
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[3].module.validators()] == ["protected_glossary_guard"]
assert [validator.name for validator in specs[4].module.validators()] == ["protected_glossary_guard"]