eric/audita
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 6 Wiki Activity

Align prompts and strengthen validation context

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Eric Rakestraw
2026-09-25 12:23:10 +00:00
parent 3eb73e70fc
commit 325c4ea7d3
23 changed files with 329 additions and 133 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

31
docs/internal/validators.md
View File

@@ -107,3 +107,34 @@ is covered by [report assembly](diagnostics-reporting.md).
- `internal/framework/validators/*_test.go`
- `internal/framework/processreport/correction_ledger_test.go`
- `internal/cli/run_test.go`
## Supplemental Validation Context
Each candidate includes the immediately preceding and following source segments
available within its fixed chunk, plus glossary entries whose names, aliases, or
recognized plurals appear in its original/resulting text or those neighbors.
Glossary matching reuses the protected vocabulary; entries retain glossary order.
This supplies evidence such as a troupe definition for a proposed `Jesters`
correction or an adjacent speaker turn explaining deliberate repetition. A correction
already clear from its own segment does not require such evidence. No audio,
out-of-chunk context, or complete transcript is implied.
Context is serialized inside the validation item and included in the existing
payload token estimate. If one enriched item exceeds the configured limit, optional
neighbors are removed from the end first, then glossary entries from the end,
until it fits or only required candidate data remains. Required before/after text
is never truncated. Existing oversized-candidate handling still applies if that
required data does not fit. Context is supplemental, not a promise that every
relevant definition or neighboring utterance always fits. This uses the existing
payload estimator, not a new guarantee about the provider's full context window.
## Protected-Name Repetition
Spoken-word cleanup may reduce repeated protected-name occurrences when every
original protected identity still appears in the resulting segment and surviving
spellings satisfy existing capitalization checks. Full-segment preview supports
both a replacement of the repeated phrase and deletion of a redundant span. This
exception only relaxes the deterministic count guard; editorial and meaning-reversal
validation still decide whether the repetition was accidental and the edit preserves
meaning. Intentional emphasis and substantive references remain protected by those
reviews. Other modules retain their existing protection rules.