Simplify references and output instructions in LLM prompts
This commit is contained in:
@@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ func TestChunkLLMValidationItemsMultipleBatchesStableNoDropNoDup(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorApprovalAndRejection(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 0, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "ok"},
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 1, Approved: false, Confidence: 0.95, Reason: "bad"},
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 1, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "ok"},
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 2, Approved: false, Confidence: 0.95, Reason: "bad"},
|
||||
}}}}
|
||||
v, err := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
@@ -224,13 +224,14 @@ func TestLLMBackedValidatorReconcilesDecisionIdentities(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
unavailable []int
|
||||
ignored []int
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{"missing and extra", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(7), reject(18), approve(99)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonMissingValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, []int{99}},
|
||||
{"conflicting duplicate", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(7), approve(11), reject(11), reject(18)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonDuplicateValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, nil},
|
||||
{"identical duplicate", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(7), approve(11), approve(11), reject(18)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonDuplicateValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, nil},
|
||||
{"extra only", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(99), reject(18), approve(7), approve(99), approve(11)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, true, ReasonApproved}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, nil, []int{99, 99}},
|
||||
{"internal index is not a local reference", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(7), approve(2), reject(3)}, []expectedDecision{{7, false, ReasonMissingValidationDecision}, {11, true, ReasonApproved}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{7}, []int{7}},
|
||||
{"missing and extra", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(1), reject(3), approve(99)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonMissingValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, []int{99}},
|
||||
{"conflicting duplicate", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(1), approve(2), reject(2), reject(3)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonDuplicateValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, nil},
|
||||
{"identical duplicate", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(1), approve(2), approve(2), reject(3)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonDuplicateValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, nil},
|
||||
{"extra only", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(99), reject(3), approve(1), approve(99), approve(2)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, true, ReasonApproved}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, nil, []int{99, 99}},
|
||||
{"empty", nil, []expectedDecision{{7, false, ReasonMissingValidationDecision}, {11, false, ReasonMissingValidationDecision}, {18, false, ReasonMissingValidationDecision}}, []int{7, 11, 18}, nil},
|
||||
{"reordered", []LLMValidationDecision{reject(18), approve(11), approve(7)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, true, ReasonApproved}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, nil, nil},
|
||||
{"invalid confidence", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(7), {CorrectionIndex: 11, Approved: true, Confidence: 1.2}, reject(18)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonInvalidValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, nil},
|
||||
{"reordered", []LLMValidationDecision{reject(3), approve(2), approve(1)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, true, ReasonApproved}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, nil, nil},
|
||||
{"invalid confidence", []LLMValidationDecision{approve(1), {CorrectionIndex: 2, Approved: true, Confidence: 1.2}, reject(3)}, []expectedDecision{{7, true, ReasonApproved}, {11, false, ReasonInvalidValidationDecision}, {18, false, "llm_rejected"}}, []int{11}, nil},
|
||||
} {
|
||||
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: tc.entries}}}
|
||||
@@ -337,7 +338,7 @@ func TestLLMBackedValidatorOversizedSingleProposalRejectsOnlyThatProposal(t *tes
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLLMBackedValidatorDiagnosticsIncludeSchemaMetadata(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 0, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "ok"},
|
||||
{CorrectionIndex: 1, Approved: true, Confidence: 0.9, Reason: "ok"},
|
||||
}}}}
|
||||
writer := &captureValidationDiagnosticsWriter{}
|
||||
v, err := NewLLMBackedValidator("spoken_form_plausibility_review", LLMValidatorTypeSpokenFormPlausibility)
|
||||
@@ -376,7 +377,7 @@ func TestEveryValidationTypeSelectsEmbeddedPromptAndVariables(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, tc := range cases {
|
||||
t.Run(string(tc.kind), func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{{CorrectionIndex: 0, Approved: true, Confidence: .9, Reason: "ok"}}}}}
|
||||
client := &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{{CorrectionIndex: 1, Approved: true, Confidence: .9, Reason: "ok"}}}}}
|
||||
validator, err := NewLLMBackedValidator(string(tc.kind), tc.kind)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||||
@@ -401,7 +402,7 @@ func TestEveryValidationTypeSelectsEmbeddedPromptAndVariables(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestValidationDiagnosticFailureDoesNotChangeDecision(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
cause := errors.New("diagnostic storage unavailable")
|
||||
req := makeReq([]proposals.EnrichedCorrectionProposal{mk(0, "gestures", "Jesters")})
|
||||
req.LLMClient = &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{{CorrectionIndex: 0, Approved: true, Confidence: 1, Reason: "ok"}}}}}
|
||||
req.LLMClient = &fakeStructuredLLMClient{responses: []LLMValidationResponse{{Validations: []LLMValidationDecision{{CorrectionIndex: 1, Approved: true, Confidence: 1, Reason: "ok"}}}}}
|
||||
req.DiagnosticsWriter = &captureValidationDiagnosticsWriter{err: cause}
|
||||
var reported error
|
||||
req.ReportDiagnosticError = func(err error) { reported = err }
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user