Prepare the D&D processing configuration sprint
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,13 +1,503 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Plan
|
||||
# Implementation Plan 0008: Opinionated D&D Processing Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Status: pending
|
||||
Status: ready
|
||||
|
||||
No implementation plan is currently active. Feature 0007 was implemented and
|
||||
independently reviewed through pipeline-role remediation commit `7572fa3`.
|
||||
Its durable scope, decisions, and acceptance criteria remain in
|
||||
[Feature 0007](features/0007-dnd-asset-deployment-and-scriptorium-integration.md),
|
||||
and the completed review record remains in [the remediation
|
||||
document](remediation.md).
|
||||
Target executor: GPT-5.6-Terra
|
||||
|
||||
Select and approve the next feature roadmap before replacing this notice with
|
||||
a new staged implementation plan.
|
||||
Feature roadmap:
|
||||
`docs/roadmap/features/0008-opinionated-dnd-processing-configuration.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Active plan location: `docs/roadmap/implementation.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Extend `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline` with the deliberately opinionated Audita
|
||||
policy, Narratio processing contracts, individually composed D&D artifacts,
|
||||
party-driven character-analysis family, and selectable `testing` profile
|
||||
defined by Feature 0008. Preserve the standalone roles as generic application
|
||||
installers and validate the assembled behavior through native application
|
||||
interfaces without making provider requests.
|
||||
|
||||
The feature roadmap remains authoritative for scope, rationale, target state,
|
||||
and acceptance criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Execute stages in numeric order.
|
||||
- Before each stage, confirm its preconditions and the working-tree state of
|
||||
its owning repository.
|
||||
- Before each stage, reread every document listed in that stage's Required
|
||||
Policy Review. Do not rely on policy recalled from an earlier stage.
|
||||
- Preserve unrelated and pre-existing changes.
|
||||
- Stop and report if an application contract differs from the feature roadmap
|
||||
in a way that requires a product or architecture decision. Do not silently
|
||||
substitute legacy test-machine syntax.
|
||||
- Keep standalone application roles and the two asset repositories unchanged.
|
||||
All production changes belong to `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`.
|
||||
- Start from direct role defaults, dependency variables, one directory loop,
|
||||
and one template loop. Do not add configuration probes, assembly facts,
|
||||
handlers, validation tasks, checksums, manifests, cleanup machinery, or a
|
||||
duplicate Narratio root template.
|
||||
- Trust `ansible.builtin.file`, `ansible.builtin.template`, the standalone
|
||||
roles, and ConfigKit to provide their documented convergence behavior.
|
||||
- Do not put credentials or credential values in role defaults, templates,
|
||||
documentation, or tests. Environment-variable names are configuration and
|
||||
may be managed.
|
||||
- Do not run WhisperX, a model provider, a complete transcript, or any other
|
||||
external processing workload during validation.
|
||||
- Run every stage's validation before committing it.
|
||||
- Commit each completed stage when it leaves the repository valid, using the
|
||||
plain-English commit intent specified by that stage.
|
||||
- Do not begin a dependent stage after an earlier stage fails validation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Starting State and Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
- `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline` is on `main` at reviewed Feature 0007 commit
|
||||
`7572fa37cfc8` and has a clean working tree.
|
||||
- Features 0001 through 0007 and the standalone-role test simplification are
|
||||
complete.
|
||||
- The workspace control repository's Feature 0008 roadmap and this plan must
|
||||
be committed before implementation begins.
|
||||
- `assets/campaigns` and `assets/narratio-prompts` are available as local,
|
||||
clean reference repositories. Their current revisions supply representative
|
||||
campaign parties and the six D&D prompt contracts used by this feature.
|
||||
- The authoritative application repositories are available at
|
||||
`../audita`, `../narratio`, `../promptkit`, and `../scriptorium`.
|
||||
- The workspace `.venv` provides `ansible-playbook` 2.21.3 and `ansible-lint`
|
||||
26.8.0. The role's existing integration driver installs its pinned Galaxy
|
||||
dependencies into private temporary paths.
|
||||
- The integration host is an acceptable proxy for Ubuntu 26.04 and permits
|
||||
task-level privilege escalation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository Scope
|
||||
|
||||
- `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline` is the only implementation repository that may
|
||||
change. It owns suite defaults, the argument specification, dependency
|
||||
wiring, Narratio fragment templates, convergence tasks, integration tests,
|
||||
and consumer documentation.
|
||||
- `ansible-role-{audita,narratio,notarius,scriptorium,seriatim}` may be
|
||||
inspected for their public interfaces but must remain unchanged.
|
||||
- `assets/campaigns`, `assets/narratio-prompts`, `../audita`, `../narratio`,
|
||||
`../promptkit`, and `../scriptorium` may be inspected as authoritative
|
||||
contracts but must remain unchanged.
|
||||
- `rakestraw-ansible` and `assets/configs` are read-only historical or
|
||||
operational references, not contracts to reproduce.
|
||||
- The workspace control repository changes only before or after the sprint for
|
||||
planning and progress management; implementation stages do not edit it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage 1: Apply the D&D Audita Policy
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Expose the selected suite-prefixed Audita settings and pass them through the
|
||||
standalone Audita role so the installed Audita configuration represents the
|
||||
complete reviewed D&D policy.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Policy Review
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning this stage, read:
|
||||
|
||||
- `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- `docs/orientation.md`
|
||||
- `docs/conventions.md`
|
||||
- `docs/ansible.md`
|
||||
- `docs/testing.md`
|
||||
- `docs/roadmap/features/0008-opinionated-dnd-processing-configuration.md`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-audita/defaults/main.yml`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-audita/meta/argument_specs.yml`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-audita/README.md`
|
||||
- `../audita/docs/config.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
- `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline` is clean at `7572fa37cfc8`.
|
||||
- Every selected Audita field in the feature roadmap still has a corresponding
|
||||
standalone-role variable with the same native meaning.
|
||||
- No secret value is required to render or natively validate the configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
### Owning Repository
|
||||
|
||||
`ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Changes
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add one `dnd_pipeline_`-prefixed default for every Audita field in the
|
||||
roadmap's **Selected Audita and Testing Policy** table. Use the exact
|
||||
selected values, including the repeated `glossary` module, endpoint and
|
||||
models, environment-variable names, falsey-capable numeric values,
|
||||
durations, context description, and diagnostic policy.
|
||||
2. Use a single `dnd_pipeline_audita_output_schema` default of `audita-v1` as
|
||||
the suite source of truth. Stage 2 will also use that value for Narratio's
|
||||
adapter boundary.
|
||||
3. Add matching entries to `meta/argument_specs.yml` with native Ansible types:
|
||||
lists remain lists, integers remain integers, threshold values remain
|
||||
numeric, and durations, URLs, model names, environment-variable names, the
|
||||
context description, schema, and retention policy remain strings. These are
|
||||
concrete suite policy and are required within this role's defaulted public
|
||||
interface.
|
||||
4. In `meta/main.yml`, pass every suite Audita variable to the existing
|
||||
corresponding `audita_*` dependency variable. Do not also pass these values
|
||||
as Narratio Audita command-line overrides; Narratio already receives the
|
||||
managed Audita configuration path.
|
||||
5. Do not change `ansible-role-audita`, add role-private state, or add runtime
|
||||
tests to `tasks/main.yml`. Rendering and validation remain owned by the
|
||||
standalone role and the integration suite respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
Run from `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tests/integration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then inspect the effective managed policy with Audita's native interface:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
/usr/local/bin/audita config validate --config /usr/local/etc/audita/config.yml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected result: the existing suite integration passes, Audita natively accepts
|
||||
the rendered configuration, the repeated module order and all selected D&D
|
||||
values are effective, no provider request occurs, and the driver's immediate
|
||||
repeat reports `changed=0` and `failed=0`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- Every selected Audita value has one documented suite-prefixed source and one
|
||||
corresponding standalone-role dependency assignment.
|
||||
- No Audita application default outside the selected table has been copied
|
||||
into the pipeline role.
|
||||
- The role remains syntax-clean, lint-clean, natively valid, and idempotent.
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Commit intent: `Add the D&D Audita configuration defaults`
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage 2: Compose the Narratio Processing and Artifact Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Deploy the explicit Narratio ConfigKit layout, pin only the suite-owned
|
||||
coordination contracts, define each artifact and family independently, and
|
||||
provide the selectable testing overlay.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Policy Review
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning this stage, read:
|
||||
|
||||
- `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- `docs/orientation.md`
|
||||
- `docs/conventions.md`
|
||||
- `docs/ansible.md`
|
||||
- `docs/testing.md`
|
||||
- `docs/roadmap/features/0008-opinionated-dnd-processing-configuration.md`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-narratio/defaults/main.yml`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-narratio/templates/pipeline.yml.j2`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-narratio/meta/argument_specs.yml`
|
||||
- `../narratio/docs/config.md`
|
||||
- `../narratio/docs/cli.md`
|
||||
- the current prompt manifests under `assets/narratio-prompts/prompts/trim`
|
||||
and `assets/narratio-prompts/prompts/analyze`
|
||||
|
||||
### Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
- Stage 1 is committed and validated.
|
||||
- Narratio still supports explicit relative ConfigKit imports, additive
|
||||
disjoint base fragments, the fixed `profiles/testing.yml` overlay,
|
||||
`party.characters` artifact families, and the source identifiers selected
|
||||
in the roadmap.
|
||||
- The deployed prompt manifests still declare the input names recorded in the
|
||||
roadmap.
|
||||
|
||||
### Owning Repository
|
||||
|
||||
`ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Changes
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add field-specific suite defaults and argument-spec entries for exactly the
|
||||
selected Narratio coordination values:
|
||||
`seriatim-intermediate` Seriatim output, `transcripts/final.json`
|
||||
normalization with `seriatim-intermediate`, enabled trimming to
|
||||
`transcripts/final.trimmed.json`, `dnd.session_bounds` with input
|
||||
`transcript` and output `artifacts/session_bounds.json`, and enabled
|
||||
Markdown rendering. Reuse `dnd_pipeline_audita_output_schema` for the
|
||||
Narratio Audita output schema. Do not expose or render Narratio-local
|
||||
reports, timeouts, debug settings, work retention, title, presentation
|
||||
flags, or bounds profile settings.
|
||||
2. Add the five complete native-mapping defaults and matching dictionary
|
||||
argument specifications fixed by the roadmap:
|
||||
`dnd_pipeline_narratio_session_recap_artifact`,
|
||||
`dnd_pipeline_narratio_hostile_rumors_artifact`,
|
||||
`dnd_pipeline_narratio_deranged_rumors_artifact`,
|
||||
`dnd_pipeline_narratio_scene_map_artifact`, and
|
||||
`dnd_pipeline_narratio_character_analysis_family`.
|
||||
3. Give those mappings the exact base topology selected by the roadmap:
|
||||
recap and both rumor artifacts enabled; scene map and character family
|
||||
disabled but fully executable when explicitly selected; current trimmed
|
||||
transcript inputs for recap, scene map, and the family; an optional
|
||||
previous-session recap input for recap and the family; current recap inputs
|
||||
for both rumors; no redundant `depends_on`; no base `profile_id`; and the
|
||||
canonical output paths. The family uses `for_each: party.characters`, key
|
||||
`character_meta_analysis`, and member variables `character_name` from
|
||||
`character.name` and `character_class` from `character.class_summary`.
|
||||
4. Add one string default and argument-spec entry for the testing Scriptorium
|
||||
profile, defaulting to `gemini-flash-latest`. The testing overlay must set
|
||||
only `profile_id` for all four ordinary artifacts and the one family; it
|
||||
must not duplicate base definitions, imports, Audita settings, credentials,
|
||||
or processing topology.
|
||||
5. Add templates for `conf.d/processing.yml`, each of the four artifact files,
|
||||
`artifact-families/character-meta-analysis.yml`, and
|
||||
`profiles/testing.yml`. Each artifact/family template emits its fixed
|
||||
top-level source key and serializes the corresponding complete mapping with
|
||||
Ansible/Jinja YAML filters. Do not hand-build scalar quoting or merge a
|
||||
second raw override interface.
|
||||
6. Extend `tasks/main.yml` with one `ansible.builtin.file` loop that directly
|
||||
manages `conf.d`, `artifacts`, `artifact-families`, and `profiles` below
|
||||
`/usr/local/etc/narratio` as `root:narratio` mode `0750`, and one
|
||||
`ansible.builtin.template` loop that directly manages the seven files as
|
||||
`root:narratio` mode `0640`. Apply `become: true` to both tasks. Do not add
|
||||
`stat`, handlers, notifications, validation commands, cleanup, or ownership
|
||||
probes.
|
||||
7. In the Narratio dependency entry in `meta/main.yml`, pass an exact ordered
|
||||
list of relative `path` imports for the processing file, four artifacts,
|
||||
and family file. Also pass only the coordination values that belong in the
|
||||
standalone root document or otherwise cannot be supplied by the fragment.
|
||||
Do not define the same ConfigKit leaf in both root and an import. Keep file
|
||||
names, imports, and top-level keys fixed rather than exposing a second
|
||||
topology override.
|
||||
8. Keep the endpoint, models, modules, tuning, and diagnostic settings solely
|
||||
in Audita's managed configuration. The Narratio processing fragment adds
|
||||
only `audita.output_schema`; Narratio continues to supply Audita's
|
||||
run-specific `--output` path.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
Run from `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tests/integration
|
||||
/usr/bin/sudo -u narratio /usr/local/bin/narratio config validate --config /usr/local/etc/narratio/pipeline.yml --campaign centaurs
|
||||
/usr/bin/sudo -u narratio /usr/local/bin/narratio config validate --config /usr/local/etc/narratio/pipeline.yml --campaign centaurs --profile testing
|
||||
/usr/bin/sudo -u narratio /usr/local/bin/narratio config artifacts --config /usr/local/etc/narratio/pipeline.yml --campaign centaurs
|
||||
/usr/bin/sudo -u narratio /usr/local/bin/narratio config diff default testing --config /usr/local/etc/narratio/pipeline.yml --campaign centaurs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected result: base and testing configurations validate without external
|
||||
calls; artifact inspection shows the enabled recap, inferred recap-to-rumor
|
||||
dependencies, disabled selectable scene map, and one disabled generated
|
||||
character artifact per campaign member; the semantic diff contains only the
|
||||
testing profile selections; the existing integration remains clean on its
|
||||
immediate repeat.
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- The installed tree and explicit import order exactly match the roadmap.
|
||||
- No base leaf is claimed by more than one ConfigKit source.
|
||||
- All artifact inputs match their prompt manifests and all output paths match
|
||||
the selected suite contract.
|
||||
- Production prompt profiles remain inherited and the testing overlay changes
|
||||
only the five selected `profile_id` leaves.
|
||||
- The implementation consists of direct defaults, templates, dependency
|
||||
wiring, one directory task, and one template task without additional
|
||||
convergence machinery.
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Commit intent: `Add the Narratio D&D processing configuration`
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage 3: Exercise the Assembled Configuration Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Extend the existing integration driver with the smallest representative set of
|
||||
native state-based checks that protects Feature 0008 and its clean convergence.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Policy Review
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning this stage, read:
|
||||
|
||||
- `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- `docs/orientation.md`
|
||||
- `docs/conventions.md`
|
||||
- `docs/ansible.md`
|
||||
- `docs/testing.md`
|
||||
- `docs/roadmap/features/0008-opinionated-dnd-processing-configuration.md`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline/tests/integration`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline/tests/converge.yml`
|
||||
- `../narratio/docs/cli.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
- Stages 1 and 2 are committed and validated.
|
||||
- Both local asset repositories remain clean and can be installed through the
|
||||
existing immutable `file://` test inputs.
|
||||
- Native Audita, Narratio, and Scriptorium inspection commands can exercise
|
||||
configuration without contacting a provider.
|
||||
|
||||
### Owning Repository
|
||||
|
||||
`ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Changes
|
||||
|
||||
1. Retain the current integration driver's private dependency installation,
|
||||
immutable local asset revisions, native application checks, selected-version
|
||||
behavior, cleanup boundary, and immediate clean repeats.
|
||||
2. Extend the baseline with native Audita validation and native Narratio base
|
||||
and `testing` validation for one deployed campaign. Do not parse rendered
|
||||
files or repeat module-managed file ownership and mode assertions.
|
||||
3. Use `narratio config artifacts` for one representative enabled artifact,
|
||||
one inferred rumor dependency, and representative party-family expansion.
|
||||
Do not enumerate every artifact or campaign character.
|
||||
4. Use `narratio config diff default testing` to establish that the overlay is
|
||||
independently selectable and changes Scriptorium profile selection without
|
||||
duplicating the base topology.
|
||||
5. Explicitly override the suite testing-profile variable with the driver's
|
||||
existing `endpoint-profile` fixture and observe that effective selection.
|
||||
Also use Scriptorium's native inspection interface to resolve one production
|
||||
prompt profile and the explicit testing fixture without provider traffic.
|
||||
Do not assert that `gemini-flash-latest` remains the role's default.
|
||||
6. Keep one immediate unchanged repeat after the representative Feature 0008
|
||||
inputs and require `changed=0` and `failed=0`. Avoid task-result assertions,
|
||||
snapshots, exact default documents, implementation counts, or tests of
|
||||
ConfigKit and trusted Ansible module behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
Run from `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tests/integration
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected result: syntax checking and production-profile lint pass; all five
|
||||
applications and both asset repositories converge; Audita and both Narratio
|
||||
profiles validate natively; representative production/testing Scriptorium
|
||||
profiles resolve without provider calls; the artifact graph and family
|
||||
expansion are observed through Narratio; the explicit profile override is
|
||||
effective; and the immediate repeat reports `changed=0` and `failed=0`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- Each new test protects a user-visible Feature 0008 behavior and remains valid
|
||||
after an internal task or template refactor.
|
||||
- No test freezes the current role default, snapshots a complete file, tests a
|
||||
trusted module, or invokes an external processing service.
|
||||
- The complete integration driver passes from a clean dependency installation.
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Commit intent: `Test the D&D processing configuration`
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage 4: Document Production and Testing Operation
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Document the role's opinionated policy, supported customization boundary,
|
||||
installed composition layout, and native production/testing inspection
|
||||
workflow for consumers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Policy Review
|
||||
|
||||
Before beginning this stage, read:
|
||||
|
||||
- `AGENTS.md`
|
||||
- `docs/orientation.md`
|
||||
- `docs/conventions.md`
|
||||
- `docs/ansible.md`
|
||||
- `docs/testing.md`
|
||||
- `docs/roadmap/features/0008-opinionated-dnd-processing-configuration.md`
|
||||
- `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline/README.md`
|
||||
- `../narratio/docs/cli.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
- Stages 1 through 3 are committed and validated.
|
||||
- Variable names, installed paths, source keys, and native commands in the
|
||||
implementation are final and match the roadmap.
|
||||
|
||||
### Owning Repository
|
||||
|
||||
`ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Changes
|
||||
|
||||
1. Update the README variable reference for the new Audita, Narratio
|
||||
coordination, artifact/family mapping, and testing-profile variables. Make
|
||||
clear that concrete defaults are deliberate D&D suite policy rather than a
|
||||
mirror of application defaults.
|
||||
2. Document the root/import ownership boundary and exact installed
|
||||
`conf.d`, `artifacts`, `artifact-families`, and `profiles` layout.
|
||||
3. Explain that each artifact/family mapping is replaceable as one native
|
||||
mapping while the file, import, and top-level key remain fixed. Document
|
||||
`enabled: false` as the way to retain but normally disable a source.
|
||||
4. Document base validation, `--profile testing`, artifact inspection, and
|
||||
`config diff default testing` with commands that require neither a provider
|
||||
request nor edits to managed files.
|
||||
5. Explain that production artifacts inherit prompt-owned profiles, the
|
||||
testing profile defaults to `gemini-flash-latest`, and callers can explicitly
|
||||
replace the testing profile through inventory. Do not document the current
|
||||
default as a compatibility guarantee.
|
||||
6. State the intentional boundaries: Audita owns its endpoint/model/tuning
|
||||
configuration; Narratio supplies its run-specific Audita output path; API
|
||||
keys, Notarius enablement, storage/publishing, operator access, scheduling,
|
||||
and end-to-end external execution remain deferred.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
Run from `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline`:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tests/integration
|
||||
git diff --check HEAD
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected result: the complete behavioral suite remains green and idempotent;
|
||||
documentation matches the implemented variables, paths, and CLI; and no
|
||||
whitespace errors are reported.
|
||||
|
||||
### Completion Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- A consumer can identify what the suite deliberately owns, what remains an
|
||||
application default, how to replace each supported policy value, and how to
|
||||
select and inspect testing behavior.
|
||||
- Documentation does not promise deferred behavior or expose credentials.
|
||||
- The repository remains fully validated after documentation changes.
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Commit intent: `Document D&D processing profiles and artifacts`
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Validation and Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
Run from `ansible-role-dnd-pipeline` after all four stages:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tests/integration
|
||||
git diff --check HEAD
|
||||
git status --short
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The final handoff must:
|
||||
|
||||
- confirm the full integration driver passes and its immediate repeat reports
|
||||
`changed=0` and `failed=0`;
|
||||
- identify the four implementation commit hashes and confirm the pipeline-role
|
||||
working tree is clean;
|
||||
- confirm every inspected standalone role, application, and asset repository
|
||||
remains unchanged;
|
||||
- summarize any deviation from this plan, unresolved finding, or deferred
|
||||
work;
|
||||
- report any implementation complexity beyond the planned defaults,
|
||||
dependency assignments, templates, two task loops, tests, and documentation,
|
||||
together with the acceptance criterion that required it; and
|
||||
- leave Feature 0008 `ready` or `in_progress` for independent review rather
|
||||
than marking it `done`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Progress Notes
|
||||
|
||||
No implementation stages have begun. Record only concise stage commit hashes
|
||||
and blockers here during execution; preserve detailed evidence in the stage
|
||||
commits and final handoff.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user