Complete the Audita amendment and resume Notarius planning
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,134 +1,40 @@
|
||||
# Feature 0002 Remediation Review
|
||||
# Feature 0002A Remediation Review
|
||||
|
||||
Status: resolved
|
||||
|
||||
The Audita production task flow implements the approved architecture and the
|
||||
complete integration suite passes. The following residual issues should be
|
||||
corrected before Feature 0002 is accepted.
|
||||
The field-specific Audita configuration implementation has the intended
|
||||
architecture and its complete integration suite passes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding 1: Correct the Declared Role License
|
||||
|
||||
Severity: medium
|
||||
|
||||
`ansible-role-audita/meta/main.yml` declares `BSD-3-Clause`, but the
|
||||
repository's `LICENSE` file is CC0 1.0 Universal. Published role metadata must
|
||||
identify the license actually granted by the repository.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Remediation
|
||||
|
||||
- Change `galaxy_info.license` to the Galaxy-compatible SPDX identifier
|
||||
`CC0-1.0`.
|
||||
- Do not replace or otherwise alter the existing license text.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- `meta/main.yml` and `LICENSE` identify the same license.
|
||||
- Production-profile ansible-lint passes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding 2: Describe All Integration-Test Host Effects
|
||||
## Finding 2: Synchronize Amendment Progress Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
Severity: low
|
||||
|
||||
`ansible-role-audita/README.md` says that the integration suite mutates only
|
||||
the three Audita paths and its private temporary directory. Default
|
||||
convergence also enables dependency management, so on a fresh supported host
|
||||
the suite may install Git through APT, refresh the APT cache, and install the
|
||||
Go Snap. The statement is therefore incomplete.
|
||||
The configuration amendment was completed in `ansible-role-audita` commits
|
||||
`e61f02f` and `847c4c3`, while the implementation plan and workspace status
|
||||
still described it as awaiting execution.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Remediation
|
||||
### Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
- State that the suite may install or converge Git and the Go Snap in addition
|
||||
to managing the listed Audita paths.
|
||||
- Retain the statement that temporary test-specific files are confined to the
|
||||
private temporary directory.
|
||||
- Recorded the completed amendment commits in the durable Feature 0002
|
||||
roadmap.
|
||||
- Marked Feature 0002 complete in workspace status.
|
||||
- Replaced the completed fixed-location implementation plan with a pending-plan
|
||||
notice for Feature 0003.
|
||||
- Preserved Feature 0003 as the next proposed unit of work and identified its
|
||||
configuration-interface revision as the next roadmap-review step.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
## Review Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
- The README accurately describes package/Snap effects and managed filesystem
|
||||
paths.
|
||||
- The description agrees with `tests/integration` and the role defaults.
|
||||
No code remediation was required. A proposed assertion that the configuration
|
||||
was a regular file was rejected because a successful
|
||||
`ansible.builtin.template` operation already establishes the specified file
|
||||
state. Adding another assertion would re-prove the module's documented
|
||||
postcondition and conflict with the workspace convention to trust Ansible's
|
||||
abstraction boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding 3: Complete Binary-Type Verification
|
||||
|
||||
Severity: low
|
||||
|
||||
`tests/verify.yml` checks binary ownership, mode, and executability, but does
|
||||
not assert that `/usr/local/bin/audita` is a regular file. Stage 1 explicitly
|
||||
requires baseline verification of binary type and metadata. The production
|
||||
`file` task establishes this invariant, but the focused verification does not
|
||||
provide the planned evidence for it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Remediation
|
||||
|
||||
- Add an assertion for `audita_binary_metadata.stat.isreg` to the existing
|
||||
binary metadata check.
|
||||
- Do not add another probe or production task.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- `tests/verify.yml` confirms regular-file type, ownership, mode, and
|
||||
executability from its existing `stat` result.
|
||||
- The integration suite passes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding 4: Synchronize Implementation Progress Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
Severity: low
|
||||
|
||||
Both implementation stages are annotated complete in
|
||||
`docs/roadmap/implementation.md`, at role commits `47f1852` and `d37f590`, but
|
||||
the plan remains `ready`, its progress notes still say execution is ready to
|
||||
begin, and `docs/status.md` still describes execution as the current activity.
|
||||
The recorded state should show that implementation is complete and remediation
|
||||
review is in progress.
|
||||
|
||||
The two workspace commits that added stage-completion annotations also diverge
|
||||
from the plan's instruction that the out-of-band executor leave workspace
|
||||
planning files unchanged. No implementation code was placed in the wrong
|
||||
repository, so this requires tracking cleanup rather than code movement.
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Remediation
|
||||
|
||||
- Set the plan to `in_progress` while findings remain open and replace its
|
||||
stale progress note with both completed stage commits and the current
|
||||
remediation state.
|
||||
- Update workspace status so Feature 0002 is `in_progress`, with implementation
|
||||
complete and remediation pending, and make review/remediation the current
|
||||
focus.
|
||||
- Do not mark Feature 0002 `done` until remediation is implemented and
|
||||
reviewed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- The plan's status, stage annotations, and progress notes describe one
|
||||
consistent state.
|
||||
- Workspace status agrees with the implementation and remediation records.
|
||||
- `git diff --check` passes in the workspace repository.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Validation Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
The review ran the complete `ansible-role-audita/tests/integration` suite on
|
||||
Ubuntu 26.04 with Ansible Core 2.21.3 and ansible-lint 26.8.0. It passed syntax
|
||||
checking, production-profile lint, baseline and repeated convergence,
|
||||
missing-binary rebuilding, dependency opt-out with a caller-supplied Go
|
||||
executable, metadata repair without rebuilding, configuration-only
|
||||
convergence, alternate-checkout rebuilding, default restoration, native
|
||||
configuration validation, and all three platform-rejection cases.
|
||||
|
||||
The final state was default commit
|
||||
`a84941d68168a1ed9ea7423b6477ae8218be73f9`, a `root:root` mode `0755` binary,
|
||||
a `root:root` mode `0644` configuration, and native validation output
|
||||
`config is valid`. `bash -n tests/integration` and `git diff --check` also
|
||||
passed. All nested repository working trees remained clean.
|
||||
|
||||
## Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
All four findings were implemented and validated on 2026-09-08. The role now
|
||||
declares `CC0-1.0`, its README identifies dependency-management effects, and
|
||||
its existing binary `stat` result proves regular-file type. Workspace tracking
|
||||
records the completed and accepted feature. Role remediation was committed as
|
||||
`3a8c21f`.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation passed with the complete `tests/integration` suite,
|
||||
production-profile ansible-lint, `bash -n tests/integration`, and
|
||||
`git diff --check` in both changed repositories. The production task flow was
|
||||
not changed.
|
||||
The review ran the complete `tests/integration` suite on Ubuntu 26.04 with
|
||||
Ansible Core 2.21.3 and ansible-lint 26.8.0. It passed default minimal
|
||||
rendering, representative nested rendering, explicit falsey values, native
|
||||
configuration validation, configuration-only convergence, both rebuild
|
||||
triggers, dependency opt-out, metadata repair, restored default state,
|
||||
repeated convergence, and platform rejection. `git diff --check` also passed.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user