Record accepted import architecture decisions

docs/adr/0015-shared-dependency-ready-ordering.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# ADR 0015: Share Dependency-Ready Ordering Across Imports and Inheritance
+
+## Status
+
+Accepted.
+
+## Date
+
+2026-10-19
+
+## Context
+
+Imports and sibling inheritance both resolve relationships between configuration
+contributions. Their existing resolvers use different traversal rules, making
+ordering depend on which mechanism expresses a dependency. Ordering affects
+sequence contributions, provenance, and diagnostics, so a consistent rule is
+part of ConfigKit's configuration model.
+
+The resolvers also serve distinct purposes. Imports strictly compose sources;
+inheritance overlays a child on its resolved parent after source assembly.
+Item-local contributions and nested inheritance introduce scope boundaries that
+resolution must preserve.
+
+## Decision
+
+ConfigKit owns one shared dependency-ready scheduler for imports and sibling
+inheritance. Both resolvers use Kahn's algorithm with a stable ordering key,
+selecting the smallest currently eligible node after its dependencies have
+completed. The shared scheduler owns eligibility, deterministic tie-breaking,
+and dependency-cycle identification. Each resolver owns construction of its
+dependency relationships and application of its domain operations.
+
+Apply the common scheduling rule within the scopes where dependencies are
+available. Complete item-local contributions before item placement and resolve
+enclosing inheritance before relationships in the resulting nested scopes.
+Source discovery supplies the import graph; the scheduler determines resolution
+order.
+
+Strict composition, inheritance overlay, and precedence tiers retain their
+existing ownership and meanings under [ADR 0001](0001-separate-composition-and-overlay.md).
+The lifecycle and scope decisions in
+[ADR 0009](0009-sibling-inheritance.md) continue to govern inheritance. Import
+admission retains its cycle and repeated-source rules.
+
+## Alternatives Considered
+
+- **Deterministic depth-first postorder.** Keeps dependency branches together,
+  but gives traversal branch selection an additional role in ordering.
+- **Dependency rounds.** Groups nodes by readiness rounds, but delays newly
+  eligible nodes until the current round finishes.
+- **Descending longest-path depth.** Prioritizes the furthest dependencies,
+  but adds distance from the root as an ordering policy.
+- **Separate resolver algorithms.** Allows local specialization, but leaves
+  consumers and maintainers with different rules for analogous dependencies.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Both resolvers follow one deterministic ordering model and share responsibility
+for maintaining that model. Resolver-specific scopes, combination semantics,
+and source-admission rules remain explicit at their integration boundaries.
+
+Independent branches may interleave as nodes become eligible. Adopting this
+rule changes existing traversal-dependent sequence positions and reporting
+order, requiring coordinated review of source assembly, provenance, and
+inheritance behavior. The configuration contract owns the implemented ordering
+details.