Verify startup loading improvements
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# Startup Loading Performance Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Stages 1–3 complete; Stage 4 is in progress with two optimizations
|
||||
retained. Findings and reproduction commands are in
|
||||
Status: Complete. Two optimizations are retained, with final consumer
|
||||
verification and handoff recorded. Findings and reproduction commands are in
|
||||
[startup-benchmark.md](startup-benchmark.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Audience: ConfigKit maintainers implementing and reviewing this work.
|
||||
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ finding and recommend whether further investigation is justified.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Implement and measure focused changes
|
||||
|
||||
Status: In progress. `Path.String` buffer sizing and combined final metadata
|
||||
Status: Complete. `Path.String` buffer sizing and combined final metadata
|
||||
traversal are retained after fresh construction, consumer, inspection, and
|
||||
profile comparisons. See the [path-formatting experiment](startup-benchmark.md#focused-experiment-pre-size-pathstring)
|
||||
and [metadata-traversal experiment](startup-benchmark.md#focused-experiment-combine-final-metadata-traversal).
|
||||
Complete consumer-workload verification remains outstanding.
|
||||
No further optimization is selected for this effort.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Implement the selected internal change while preserving the supported API
|
||||
and established behavior. Audit any reduced copying or reused data for
|
||||
@@ -152,7 +152,12 @@ justify their complexity; a predetermined optimization count is unnecessary.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Verify the complete result against consumer workloads
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Not started.
|
||||
Status: Complete. The combined candidate was compared with the pre-optimization
|
||||
baseline across all local sizes, complementary benchmarks, and all four recorded
|
||||
PromptKit workloads. Consumer configuration and public contract tests passed.
|
||||
Acceptance rests on reproducible allocation reductions; the maintainer confirmed
|
||||
that busy-host timing is not a reliable comparison here. See the
|
||||
[final verification](startup-benchmark.md#final-consumer-verification-and-handoff).
|
||||
|
||||
1. Compare the final candidate with the unoptimized current-code baseline using
|
||||
the local fixture and relevant existing benchmarks. Confirm that gains hold
|
||||
@@ -175,7 +180,11 @@ benefit has been verified.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Record the outcome and hand off
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Not started.
|
||||
Status: Complete. Retained changes, revisions, allocation comparisons,
|
||||
reproduction commands, behavioral checks, and timing/retained-heap limitations
|
||||
are recorded in the [final handoff](startup-benchmark.md#final-consumer-verification-and-handoff).
|
||||
No required verification remains for this scope. Release preparation and
|
||||
publication remain separate work.
|
||||
|
||||
Summarize the retained changes, before/after results, revisions, reproduction
|
||||
commands, validation, tradeoffs, and unresolved questions in this roadmap.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user